Comparison of sterile versus nonsterile acellular dermal matrices for breast reconstruction.
about
Alloplastic adjuncts in breast reconstructionA Meta-analysis Assessing Postsurgical Outcomes between Aseptic and Sterile AlloDerm Regenerative Tissue MatrixOptimizing Outcomes of Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction With Acellular Dermal Matrix: A Review of Recent Clinical DataTissue Reinforcement in Implant-based Breast Reconstruction.Is Sterile Better Than Aseptic? Comparing the Microbiology of Acellular Dermal Matrices.Aseptic versus Sterile Acellular Dermal Matrices in Breast Reconstruction: An Updated Review.Relevant In Vitro Predictors of Human Acellular Dermal Matrix-Associated Inflammation and Capsule Formation in a Nonhuman Primate Subcutaneous Tissue Expander Model.Red breast syndrome: a review of available literature.The Effect of Sterile Acellular Dermal Matrix Use on Complication Rates in Implant-Based Immediate Breast Reconstructions.Systematic review and critical appraisal of the impact of acellular dermal matrix use on the outcomes of implant-based breast reconstruction.Acellular dermal matrices in breast reconstructions - a literature review.Cost analysis of postmastectomy reconstruction: A comparison of two staged implant reconstruction using tissue expander and acellular dermal matrix with abdominal-based perforator free flaps.Updated Evidence of Acellular Dermal Matrix Use for Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: A Meta-analysis.Clinical Outcomes in Breast Reconstruction Patients Using a Sterile Acellular Dermal Matrix Allograft.Breast Reconstruction Using Contour Fenestrated AlloDerm: Does Improvement in Design Translate to Improved Outcomes?Do Processing Methods Make a Difference in Acellular Dermal Matrix Properties?AlloDerm RTU Integration and Clinical Outcomes When Used for Reconstructive Breast Surgery.
P2860
Q26751729-F2C122C3-E451-49AA-88AE-42FD4B1E5198Q26800461-EB57D665-58FB-40EC-B810-C0FA315A684EQ33810890-2169121C-E434-4272-94A0-331A11D0BA6BQ34536919-63A92F93-23AD-4045-811B-8C2D7F0188EBQ37117041-C91957A8-40D3-4ADA-B1FD-1B37D3968A75Q37159005-7BBEF476-CF48-43C7-B3E4-0F902993EC91Q37576144-E089BC24-096F-474E-A705-8F78D4621F11Q38327295-FE36AC17-A2DB-4CF5-9F9F-3D797B355F59Q38377080-ABD31658-C662-418D-A981-BF7726984E0AQ38537402-5F43C1DF-C590-4565-A293-0F91B072F5D6Q38735658-5DC0CED1-83D2-4300-BCDE-4D5BCEC93AC7Q38737850-95E17518-384C-4503-A10A-A1B92110DC5DQ38956479-20A88312-5238-4DC0-BBDE-85FEA2B46F63Q39172284-F4812D3B-56D2-4C86-9FAA-398BF8BC6F5EQ40939681-B4D662BA-8049-4B4E-8A5E-4C31AC3AB3CCQ51133526-91B6AA07-A119-4CE9-A8DF-610456E96BCBQ55257748-66457672-52DF-4CD7-82FE-0E70ACA83859
P2860
Comparison of sterile versus nonsterile acellular dermal matrices for breast reconstruction.
description
2013 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2013年の論文
@ja
2013年学术文章
@wuu
2013年学术文章
@zh
2013年学术文章
@zh-cn
2013年学术文章
@zh-hans
2013年学术文章
@zh-my
2013年学术文章
@zh-sg
2013年學術文章
@yue
2013年學術文章
@zh-hant
name
Comparison of sterile versus n ...... ces for breast reconstruction.
@en
Comparison of sterile versus n ...... ces for breast reconstruction.
@nl
type
label
Comparison of sterile versus n ...... ces for breast reconstruction.
@en
Comparison of sterile versus n ...... ces for breast reconstruction.
@nl
prefLabel
Comparison of sterile versus n ...... ces for breast reconstruction.
@en
Comparison of sterile versus n ...... ces for breast reconstruction.
@nl
P2093
P1476
Comparison of sterile versus n ...... ces for breast reconstruction.
@en
P2093
Brian Rinker
Henry C Vasconez
Jared Nimtz
Jason Buseman
Joseph L Hill
Lesley Wong
Pamela Kemper
P304
P356
10.1097/SAP.0B013E31827F52C8
P577
2013-05-01T00:00:00Z