CPM Test-Retest Reliability: "Standard" vs "Single Test-Stimulus" Protocols.
about
Nonpainful wide-area compression inhibits experimental pain.Reliability of conditioned pain modulation: a systematic reviewA tonic heat test stimulus yields a larger and more reliable conditioned pain modulation effect compared to a phasic heat test stimulus.Efficient conditioned pain modulation despite pain persistence in painful diabetic neuropathy.Pain Modulation: From Conditioned Pain Modulation to Placebo and Nocebo Effects in Experimental and Clinical Pain
P2860
CPM Test-Retest Reliability: "Standard" vs "Single Test-Stimulus" Protocols.
description
2015 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2015年の論文
@ja
2015年学术文章
@wuu
2015年学术文章
@zh
2015年学术文章
@zh-cn
2015年学术文章
@zh-hans
2015年学术文章
@zh-my
2015年学术文章
@zh-sg
2015年學術文章
@yue
2015年學術文章
@zh-hant
name
CPM Test-Retest Reliability: "Standard" vs "Single Test-Stimulus" Protocols.
@en
CPM Test-Retest Reliability: "Standard" vs "Single Test-Stimulus" Protocols.
@nl
type
label
CPM Test-Retest Reliability: "Standard" vs "Single Test-Stimulus" Protocols.
@en
CPM Test-Retest Reliability: "Standard" vs "Single Test-Stimulus" Protocols.
@nl
prefLabel
CPM Test-Retest Reliability: "Standard" vs "Single Test-Stimulus" Protocols.
@en
CPM Test-Retest Reliability: "Standard" vs "Single Test-Stimulus" Protocols.
@nl
P2093
P2860
P356
P1433
P1476
CPM Test-Retest Reliability: "Standard" vs "Single Test-Stimulus" Protocols.
@en
P2093
Adi Miller-Barmak
David Yarnitsky
Elliot Sprecher
Oren Goldstein
Yelena Granovsky
P2860
P304
P356
10.1111/PME.12868
P577
2015-08-14T00:00:00Z