Mate choice based on a key ecological performance trait.
about
Assortative flocking in crossbills and implications for ecological speciationFemale brain size affects the assessment of male attractiveness during mate choice.Does foraging behaviour affect female mate preferences and pair formation in captive zebra finches?Ecology, sexual selection and speciation.Speciation in caves: experimental evidence that permanent darkness promotes reproductive isolation.Divergent evolution of male aggressive behaviour: another reproductive isolation barrier in extremophile poeciliid fishes?Sex-specific local life-history adaptation in surface- and cave-dwelling Atlantic mollies (Poecilia mexicana)A history-based method to estimate animal preference.Female mate preferences for male body size and shape promote sexual isolation in threespine sticklebacks.Male foraging efficiency, but not male problem-solving performance, influences female mating preferences in zebra finchesAcquisition and functional consequences of social knowledge in macaques.Genome divergence and diversification within a geographic mosaic of coevolution.Gradient evolution of body colouration in surface- and cave-dwelling Poecilia mexicana and the role of phenotype-assortative female mate choice.Population differentiation and restricted gene flow in Spanish crossbills: not isolation-by-distance but isolation-by-ecology.Genetic differentiation and selection against migrants in evolutionarily replicated extreme environments.Familiarity adds to attractiveness in matters of siskin mate choice.Artificial selection on male genitalia length alters female brain size.Direct benefits of mate choice: a meta-analysis of plumage colour and offspring feeding rates in birds.Performance is no proxy for genetic quality: trade-offs between locomotion, attractiveness, and life history in crickets.Similar preferences for ornamentation in opposite- and same-sex choice experiments.Defining individual quality over lifetimes and selective contexts.Do Female Zebra Finches, Taeniopygia guttata, Choose Their Mates Based on Their ‘Personality’?
P2860
Q28727836-AC4F12F1-C200-4F29-92D2-42118918F2EAQ30360382-10D23B36-AB08-4879-BA37-505263FDE471Q30478054-925CB42C-67E0-4F51-884B-C13A6C2DCA3DQ33837363-A05460B6-0CED-4F35-80F0-01D35E098D92Q33895861-32AB512B-627F-412A-A09C-7FA7C947FF0AQ35724981-DF74E360-8FCE-407D-84D1-3A56CDF817C6Q36670792-A8411779-4654-4F52-8851-25BD9C55DEE2Q37044393-D095BBFA-24FC-4FAB-B359-BE99843D53C6Q37058732-1B08973D-3CA3-4676-88F4-096DAF717562Q37234175-876092DE-5D88-4FB7-8908-322A4707997EQ37722018-2F070D77-4A2D-4312-BA33-6C91827FA0AEQ39342223-DD52BE96-F9D0-4EE5-BA19-879CF8D0AAA6Q42662443-D8C2982D-B0D0-471C-A743-9ABDBFA23B27Q44232773-3FD783FC-72DC-497B-8AB6-B1D4E8CA55C2Q46951740-1017A364-7283-4C0C-A32A-BF96A64D6F06Q51188996-0D685388-A6F6-429E-8710-C2144B98E251Q51247462-7357CCE2-4D07-4397-BC0F-A883354C5318Q51333393-329E0A3B-740E-42C1-9AC5-10316E023F35Q51629801-5CB4B110-C64D-41E8-B9E5-7B3106834D2DQ51774694-1A14E539-5D7E-421E-B17F-B439B59C3A78Q55462006-E41EF842-6EF4-44E1-96EE-B17B25AFC6B1Q57236631-A64EE39E-F84D-4296-B8B6-13975C2238C1
P2860
Mate choice based on a key ecological performance trait.
description
2009 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2009年の論文
@ja
2009年学术文章
@wuu
2009年学术文章
@zh
2009年学术文章
@zh-cn
2009年学术文章
@zh-hans
2009年学术文章
@zh-my
2009年学术文章
@zh-sg
2009年學術文章
@yue
2009年學術文章
@zh-hant
name
Mate choice based on a key ecological performance trait.
@en
Mate choice based on a key ecological performance trait.
@nl
type
label
Mate choice based on a key ecological performance trait.
@en
Mate choice based on a key ecological performance trait.
@nl
prefLabel
Mate choice based on a key ecological performance trait.
@en
Mate choice based on a key ecological performance trait.
@nl
P1476
Mate choice based on a key ecological performance trait.
@en
P2093
C W Benkman
L K Snowberg
P304
P356
10.1111/J.1420-9101.2009.01699.X
P577
2009-04-01T00:00:00Z