Is induction of labor risky for twins compare to singleton pregnancies? - Wikidata - wikimedia - TriplyDB

Is induction of labor risky for twins compare to singleton pregnancies?

Is induction of labor risky for twins compare to singleton pregnancies?

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q50855206

about

The effect of induction method in twin pregnancies: a secondary analysis for the twin birth study Prediction of the risk of cesarean delivery after labor induction in twin gestations based on clinical and ultrasound parameters.

P2860

Q36243118-A5A5C72B-E5F1-406F-939B-01BEEFD456D0 Q39751344-899AA688-5ABC-4FF4-8F7E-33F4C3BCCF27

P2860

Is induction of labor risky for twins compare to singleton pregnancies?

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q50855206

description

2013 nî lūn-bûn

@nan

2013年の論文

@ja

2013年学术文章

@wuu

2013年学术文章

@zh

2013年学术文章

@zh-cn

2013年学术文章

@zh-hans

2013年学术文章

@zh-my

2013年学术文章

@zh-sg

2013年學術文章

@yue

2013年學術文章

@zh-hant

name

Is induction of labor risky for twins compare to singleton pregnancies?

@en

Is induction of labor risky for twins compare to singleton pregnancies?

@nl

type

label

Is induction of labor risky for twins compare to singleton pregnancies?

@en

Is induction of labor risky for twins compare to singleton pregnancies?

@nl

prefLabel

Is induction of labor risky for twins compare to singleton pregnancies?

@en

Is induction of labor risky for twins compare to singleton pregnancies?

@nl

P1433

Q50855206-1403E6BB-620B-4DDA-B81C-0C302D1482C8

P1476

Q50855206-7FE874A8-B240-4182-8B64-069915F06521

P2093

Q50855206-1330DB08-E0FA-4851-AD1E-DB7B29A46111

Q50855206-991311EA-3AD5-44AD-B37F-71969BE82EB2

Q50855206-E31B9507-36E3-47A4-B130-387C5A301B87

P2860

Q50855206-0D983246-8181-456F-8668-F3C842C35918

Q50855206-183C6927-4362-430C-8F13-B592847DD2F3

Q50855206-3EC7C004-27B9-4430-AC3E-5BA9E3BA60CE

Q50855206-4389B0BA-9138-4C0E-BDBF-758CC6E73669

Q50855206-4ECB86ED-BCDA-414F-A1E3-696C3F92B681

Q50855206-54ACA6BF-7368-45B4-8E2B-4B923507B730

Q50855206-5688BAA2-4C8E-4088-9299-EBE450F43799

Q50855206-96CE52D1-B29B-49E3-B152-5FA20AF978C3

Q50855206-BAF04C57-7C30-443D-A815-BA730939ADC2

P304

Q50855206-A78ECF69-2D4B-4B5F-A63B-A67B61DAD9E8

P31

Q50855206-B5B109CB-8DB1-4615-8FCC-C208BD015493

P356

Q50855206-241CEFB1-D686-493D-A092-0A193BB5E4F1

P433

Q50855206-0FF97C75-18BF-4E51-AF3C-F24C1C4E369B

P478

Q50855206-D8EDEF39-714A-4A9C-91FE-7008EF1B7236

P50

Q50855206-C7CAD4AD-C857-4FFF-ADEC-8A15A5B7DA11

P577

Q50855206-7E6C30F0-5417-4980-9A51-FB4E5258779F

P698

Q50855206-BB84157E-4348-4CC9-B227-ABBAF0A523C8

P356

14767058.2013.804047

P1433

Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine

P1476

Is induction of labor risky for twins compare to singleton pregnancies?

@en

P2093

Ilana Shoham-Vardi

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Rania Okby

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Sergienko Ruslan

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P2860

Timing of birth for women with a twin pregnancy at term: a randomised controlled trial.

Outcomes of elective induction of labour compared with expectant management: population based study

Twins: prevalence, problems, and preterm births.

Trends in induction of labour, 1998-2007: a population-based study.

Induction of labor in twin compared with singleton pregnancies.

Complications of labor induction among multiparous women in a community-based hospital system.

Is misoprostol safe for labor induction in twin gestations?

Induction of labor with oral misoprostol in nulliparous mothers of twins.

Outcome after elective labor induction in nulliparous women: a matched cohort study.

P304

1804-1806

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P31

scholarly article

P356

10.3109/14767058.2013.804047

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P433

18

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P478

26

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P50

P577

2013-06-05T00:00:00Z

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime

P698

23662640

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string