Sexual selection, receiver biases, and the evolution of sex differences.
about
Comprehensive phylogenetic analysis of all species of swordtails and platies (Pisces: Genus Xiphophorus) uncovers a hybrid origin of a swordtail fish, Xiphophorus monticolus, ...Ecological and genetic divergence between two lineages of middle American túngara frogs Physalaemus (= Engystomops) pustulosus.Do women prefer more complex music around ovulation?A sensory bias has triggered the evolution of egg-spots in cichlid fishesEvolving perceptual biases for antisynchrony: a form of temporal coordination beyond synchronyChorusing, synchrony, and the evolutionary functions of rhythm.Allocating structure to function: the strong links between neuroplasticity and natural selection.Coevolution in communication senders and receivers: vocal behavior and auditory processing in multiple songbird species.Historical contingency affects signaling strategies and competitive abilities in evolving populations of simulated robots.A possible non-sexual origin of mate preference: are male guppies mimicking fruit?An exception to the matched filter hypothesis: A mismatch of male call frequency and female best hearing frequency in a torrent frogThe Acoustic Properties of Low Intensity Vocalizations Match Hearing Sensitivity in the Webbed-Toed Gecko, Gekko subpalmatusDivergence of acoustic signals in a widely distributed frog: relevance of inter-male interactionsDiversification under sexual selection: the relative roles of mate preference strength and the degree of divergence in mate preferences.Evolution of deceptive and true courtship songs in mothsCharacter displacement: ecological and reproductive responses to a common evolutionary problemTo females of a noctuid moth, male courtship songs are nothing more than bat echolocation calls.Production and perception of sex differences in vocalizations of Wied's black-tufted-ear marmosets (Callithrix kuhlii).Compatibility of basic social perceptions determines perceived attractivenessEvolution of novel signal traits in the absence of female preferences in Neoconocephalus katydids (Orthoptera, Tettigoniidae).The evolution of imperfect floral mimicrySodium channel genes and the evolution of diversity in communication signals of electric fishes: convergent molecular evolutionVestigial preference functions in neural networks and túngara frogs.It is all in the face: carotenoid skin coloration loses attractiveness outside the face.Through their eyes: selective attention in peahens during courtship.Reappraising sexual coevolution and the sex roles.Sympatry with the devil: reproductive interference could hamper species coexistence.Evolution of sexual mimicry in the orchid subtribe orchidinae: the role of preadaptations in the attraction of male bees as pollinators.Character displacement and the origins of diversity.Heritability of and early environment effects on variation in mating preferences.Hemiclonal analysis of interacting phenotypes in male and female Drosophila melanogasterSexually antagonistic coevolution in a mating system: combining experimental and comparative approaches to address evolutionary processes.From the bush to the bench: the annual Nothobranchius fishes as a new model system in biology.Female goldeneye ducks (Bucephala clangula) do not discriminate among male precopulatory display patterns.Sex: differences in mutation, recombination, selection, gene flow, and genetic drift.Pheromone evolution and sexual behavior in Drosophila are shaped by male sensory exploitation of other males.Population-Specific Covariation between Immune Function and Color of Nesting Male Threespine SticklebackExploring the hidden landscape of female preferences for complex signals.Phenotypic plasticity drives a depth gradient in male conspicuousness in threespine stickleback, Gasterosteus aculeatus.Current status of sperm cryopreservation in biomedical research fish models: zebrafish, medaka, and Xiphophorus
P2860
Q21192757-213944B5-5F17-4D3F-AEC4-18DDE0B81FFFQ21284129-25742D60-D7E1-4040-ABAB-8FC265CF24BEQ27304312-8ED3B2B0-A1EE-4AA9-B206-F2D63780A9E2Q27318069-4B5F2C79-55A3-4374-B557-DD799AF37FCFQ28607070-D43D95F3-AFC6-4EDE-B193-DD4CC741D2D3Q28654774-D3BEFE78-EAA2-4209-AB3D-303D8491D566Q28660839-333414E4-B46D-4966-B983-8F663E29353AQ28731937-02F3756C-7AAB-4FC3-B9B3-AE4593D0919BQ28732251-20E138CF-3C9F-4465-884B-67AC0626B297Q29036503-2E5CD1DA-F0A2-4695-9423-97C3AE10B478Q30365922-A1466B8D-6748-4FD3-9125-4E90AF07226CQ30393831-9D8147E9-FFD4-478D-94E6-EF242BA3C25FQ30443783-2B16C0BE-6D45-45D3-8D2D-46023CEF31FEQ30449741-9A192368-E861-4773-82A1-8703838BFB25Q30453255-98ED10D1-4281-4711-9AD8-39E937E73381Q30470560-42DBEE8B-96EA-4D86-98B7-5A618A06AD35Q30473628-378F116B-A2D5-4A23-99D5-C9CB6C9D4433Q30478664-D5F1DB4C-E6DC-46BF-B31F-ABD39D2E6BDDQ30479117-A998F687-92CE-40D6-95D0-24B410F2FEBCQ30479854-8D5FB1BF-7F8A-4752-96EE-0A57F2426A8FQ30482086-3B1BCC4B-194A-4850-B6AE-201C5E82D6CEQ30498750-86640041-ED29-4AE2-90F7-4D9DB053C5F6Q30531113-0852C681-0E9A-4A0A-82CD-DDF72FE94526Q30560484-AC42F383-CC3D-45BC-8719-46993768BF20Q30581883-BA505500-7B95-489E-873E-259C942C0AADQ30973109-A0F99448-D670-4592-8624-49BC689D60B1Q33288444-3808F70B-E79E-4B6E-AC12-1E6A1009B2B0Q33316842-53EA0897-EFB6-4164-A3A5-6CB8157E3700Q33736267-B8B6B266-14AB-4067-ABFE-1711CA6A4295Q33854040-42B287C4-453E-41C4-8C9F-BDC423B58A93Q33914061-D6DFD83D-400A-4C74-86E3-AB167C89BC48Q34130903-1B818EFC-0DB0-4D4A-B0F8-6BC42D426C26Q34474212-0EDD9923-ED82-4B89-B2C2-76CD1B701F56Q34629357-8B14BBCA-0BA7-4FB3-ABE4-2DE4A9A6F3D1Q34708415-FBCCE3B5-BADE-4807-92A8-2CD9B552A0CAQ35091150-E95BDB95-0517-4448-A330-7AE546E20B1AQ35680576-5D5A4A02-4F3B-462A-8354-9E76388F5219Q36276727-D2E1712F-ECDE-447D-8AF1-7157DF93BA36Q36394740-30CF0130-5DFC-45A4-81B9-30614660373EQ37178473-A80039E8-9E89-453D-8F70-0037DABA3B7D
P2860
Sexual selection, receiver biases, and the evolution of sex differences.
description
1998 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
1998年の論文
@ja
1998年学术文章
@wuu
1998年学术文章
@zh
1998年学术文章
@zh-cn
1998年学术文章
@zh-hans
1998年学术文章
@zh-my
1998年学术文章
@zh-sg
1998年學術文章
@yue
1998年學術文章
@zh-hant
name
Sexual selection, receiver biases, and the evolution of sex differences.
@en
Sexual selection, receiver biases, and the evolution of sex differences.
@nl
type
label
Sexual selection, receiver biases, and the evolution of sex differences.
@en
Sexual selection, receiver biases, and the evolution of sex differences.
@nl
prefLabel
Sexual selection, receiver biases, and the evolution of sex differences.
@en
Sexual selection, receiver biases, and the evolution of sex differences.
@nl
P1433
P1476
Sexual selection, receiver biases, and the evolution of sex differences.
@en
P2093
P304
P356
10.1126/SCIENCE.281.5385.1999
P407
P577
1998-09-01T00:00:00Z