Anteroinferior 2.7-mm versus 3.5-mm plating for AO/OTA type B clavicle fractures: a comparative cohort clinical outcomes study.
about
Operative versus nonoperative treatment for displaced midshaft clavicle fractures: a meta-analysis based on current evidenceDoes plate type influence the clinical outcomes and implant removal in midclavicular fractures fixed with 2.7-mm anteroinferior plates? A retrospective cohort studyAre clinical outcomes affected by type of plate used for management of mid-shaft clavicle fractures?
P2860
Anteroinferior 2.7-mm versus 3.5-mm plating for AO/OTA type B clavicle fractures: a comparative cohort clinical outcomes study.
description
2013 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2013年の論文
@ja
2013年学术文章
@wuu
2013年学术文章
@zh
2013年学术文章
@zh-cn
2013年学术文章
@zh-hans
2013年学术文章
@zh-my
2013年学术文章
@zh-sg
2013年學術文章
@yue
2013年學術文章
@zh-hant
name
Anteroinferior 2.7-mm versus 3 ...... ohort clinical outcomes study.
@en
Anteroinferior 2.7-mm versus 3 ...... ohort clinical outcomes study.
@nl
type
label
Anteroinferior 2.7-mm versus 3 ...... ohort clinical outcomes study.
@en
Anteroinferior 2.7-mm versus 3 ...... ohort clinical outcomes study.
@nl
prefLabel
Anteroinferior 2.7-mm versus 3 ...... ohort clinical outcomes study.
@en
Anteroinferior 2.7-mm versus 3 ...... ohort clinical outcomes study.
@nl
P2093
P1476
Anteroinferior 2.7-mm versus 3 ...... ohort clinical outcomes study.
@en
P2093
Balazs Galdi
Edward W Choung
Frank A Liporace
Mark C Reilly
Michael Sirkin
Wade R Smith
P304
P356
10.1097/BOT.0B013E3182693F32
P50
P577
2013-03-01T00:00:00Z