Comparison between the C-leg microprocessor-controlled prosthetic knee and non-microprocessor control prosthetic knees: a preliminary study of energy expenditure, obstacle course performance, and quality of life survey.
about
Measures and procedures utilized to determine the added value of microprocessor-controlled prosthetic knee joints: a systematic reviewTransfemoral amputations: is there an effect of residual limb length and orientation on energy expenditure?Energy expenditure and activity of transfemoral amputees using mechanical and microprocessor-controlled prosthetic kneesDevelopment of a biomechanical energy harvester.Safety, energy efficiency, and cost efficacy of the C-Leg for transfemoral amputees: A review of the literature.Developing prescribing guidelines for microprocessor-controlled prosthetic knees in the South East England.Issues affecting the level of prosthetics research evidence: Secondary analysis of a systematic review.C-Leg® improves function and quality of life in an adolescent traumatic trans-femoral amputee: a case study.Stratified cost-utility analysis of C-Leg versus mechanical knees: Findings from an Italian sample of transfemoral amputees.Biomechanical energy harvesting: generating electricity during walking with minimal user effort.Influence of a user-adaptive prosthetic knee on quality of life, balance confidence, and measures of mobility: a randomised cross-over trial.Direct medical costs of accidental falls for adults with transfemoral amputations.Impact of a stance phase microprocessor-controlled knee prosthesis on level walking in lower functioning individuals with a transfemoral amputation.Economic benefits of microprocessor controlled prosthetic knees: a modeling study
P2860
Q30564269-0F3E6F59-64F6-477A-A4C6-D0D3AB4547FEQ34161473-0046FB72-6837-4C60-9155-E34D3286FE57Q37217847-CC7FB91B-DE56-41A5-A878-165D9D2C418CQ37259189-7ED2B079-5221-4536-B7D4-51EF0FA8A12BQ37802386-78B250A2-CCD8-4C78-80C5-443B79AA1508Q38199476-5E0D06DB-1832-40F6-8E55-E1765235B2C5Q38253601-F90447BB-F8E0-4284-80C9-7314CE5E0633Q44780868-D753DCEA-5F09-42AE-8874-5E58873C785FQ47843684-9F7ABFEF-7084-4A7D-954F-12EA5931CF90Q47926705-A66A7ABC-6183-440C-9564-E0BAF80D94CBQ48063649-39967C4A-1060-4B81-8984-AB3791595DFCQ50569231-F711195A-22E4-40FC-976A-D46CAA2F3F4EQ54738139-17C8624C-A36F-4AFF-A213-119014D4085BQ58762581-6AEF0D77-DE53-49C2-AF83-390706DCCA51
P2860
Comparison between the C-leg microprocessor-controlled prosthetic knee and non-microprocessor control prosthetic knees: a preliminary study of energy expenditure, obstacle course performance, and quality of life survey.
description
2007 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2007年の論文
@ja
2007年学术文章
@wuu
2007年学术文章
@zh
2007年学术文章
@zh-cn
2007年学术文章
@zh-hans
2007年学术文章
@zh-my
2007年学术文章
@zh-sg
2007年學術文章
@yue
2007年學術文章
@zh-hant
name
Comparison between the C-leg m ...... e, and quality of life survey.
@en
Comparison between the C-leg m ...... e, and quality of life survey.
@nl
type
label
Comparison between the C-leg m ...... e, and quality of life survey.
@en
Comparison between the C-leg m ...... e, and quality of life survey.
@nl
prefLabel
Comparison between the C-leg m ...... e, and quality of life survey.
@en
Comparison between the C-leg m ...... e, and quality of life survey.
@nl
P2093
P1476
Comparison between the C-leg m ...... e, and quality of life survey.
@en
P2093
Brenda Engbretson
Elise Hickernell
Gary Brooks
Jessica Crannell
Karen Kott
Katie Wheeler
Nathaniel Ordway
Ron Seymour
P356
10.1080/03093640600982255
P577
2007-03-01T00:00:00Z