Surprisingly rational: probability theory plus noise explains biases in judgment.
about
George Miller's magical number of immediate memory in retrospect: Observations on the faltering progression of science.Why contextual preference reversals maximize expected value.Investigation of Biases and Compensatory Strategies Using a Probabilistic Variant of the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test.A quantum theory account of order effects and conjunction fallacies in political judgments.A re-examination of "bias" in human randomness perception.Is There a Conjunction Fallacy in Legal Probabilistic Decision Making?
P2860
Surprisingly rational: probability theory plus noise explains biases in judgment.
description
2014 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2014年の論文
@ja
2014年学术文章
@wuu
2014年学术文章
@zh
2014年学术文章
@zh-cn
2014年学术文章
@zh-hans
2014年学术文章
@zh-my
2014年学术文章
@zh-sg
2014年學術文章
@yue
2014年學術文章
@zh-hant
name
Surprisingly rational: probability theory plus noise explains biases in judgment.
@en
Surprisingly rational: probability theory plus noise explains biases in judgment.
@nl
type
label
Surprisingly rational: probability theory plus noise explains biases in judgment.
@en
Surprisingly rational: probability theory plus noise explains biases in judgment.
@nl
prefLabel
Surprisingly rational: probability theory plus noise explains biases in judgment.
@en
Surprisingly rational: probability theory plus noise explains biases in judgment.
@nl
P356
P1433
P1476
Surprisingly rational: probability theory plus noise explains biases in judgment.
@en
P2093
Fintan Costello
Paul Watts
P304
P356
10.1037/A0037010
P577
2014-07-01T00:00:00Z