Potential advantages of robotic radical gastrectomy for gastric adenocarcinoma in comparison with conventional laparoscopic approach: a single institutional retrospective comparative cohort study.
about
Minimally invasive surgery for upper gastrointestinal cancer: Our experience and review of the literatureGastric cancer: Current status of lymph node dissectionComparison of short outcomes between laparoscopic and experienced robotic gastrectomy: A meta-analysis and systematic reviewCurrent status of robotic surgery in Japan.Pancreas-related complications following gastrectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis of open versus minimally invasive surgery.Evaluation of the recurrence pattern of gastric cancer after laparoscopic gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy.Robotic Total Gastrectomy With Intracorporeal Robot-Sewn Anastomosis: A Novel Approach Adopting the Double-Loop Reconstruction Method.Can Robotic Gastrectomy Surpass Laparoscopic Gastrectomy by Acquiring Long-Term Experience? A Propensity Score Analysis of a 7-Year Experience at a Single Institution.Current status of robotic gastrectomy for gastric cancer.New totally intracorporeal reconstructive approach after robotic total gastrectomy: Technical details and short-term outcomes.Long-term oncologic outcomes of robotic gastrectomy for gastric cancer compared with laparoscopic gastrectomy.Robotic surgery for upper gastrointestinal cancer: Current status and future perspectives.Surgical Outcomes After Open, Laparoscopic, and Robotic Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer.The current state of stomach cancer surgery in the world.Robot-assisted laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer.Status and Prospects of Robotic Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: Our Experience and a Review of the LiteratureRobot-assisted gastrectomy for cancer.Effectiveness of laparoscopic stomach-partitioning gastrojejunostomy for patients with gastric outlet obstruction caused by advanced gastric cancer.Comparison of the long-term outcomes of robotic radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer and conventional laparoscopic approach: a single institutional retrospective cohort study.The anatomical location of the pancreas is associated with the incidence of pancreatic fistula after laparoscopic gastrectomy.Technical aspects and short- and long-term outcomes of totally laparoscopic total gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer: a single-institution retrospective study.Technique of totally robotic delta-shaped anastomosis in distal gastrectomy.Robotic versus laparoscopic Gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a systematic review and updated meta-analysisRobotic surgery for the upper gastrointestinal tract: Current status and future perspectives.Comparison of Surgical Outcomes Between Robotic and Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy for cT1 Gastric Cancer.Robotic valvuloplastic esophagogastrostomy using double flap technique following proximal gastrectomy: technical aspects and short-term outcomes.Delta-shaped anastomosis in totally robotic Billroth I gastrectomy: technical aspects and short-term outcomes.[Robot-assisted gastrectomy for cancer. German version].Robotic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: Current evidence.The long-term clinical outcomes of robotic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a large-scale single institutional retrospective study
P2860
Q26746249-E9F541E1-9911-4808-92A8-514F30B556B8Q26766091-92FD0451-6E4A-4453-B2BA-633DC4E739E3Q28071859-DEDFC119-B386-46D5-A564-86C240BF489FQ35164798-73AAF593-5389-43C9-A939-91A6BCBB8391Q36335274-C6A643FC-2D11-4D15-BAC7-010A9487BD41Q37026745-200AD445-8356-4495-A3DE-C92C5598A7FEQ37225868-62BAC383-4DA8-45AD-BBD6-E2AD6851DD2CQ37549207-97FBA437-4B0F-46F4-92A3-50F630FCCC1AQ38505236-171D28E2-1BDC-4EF0-99B3-7009869E2681Q38685237-A2BA906E-70DF-4AA0-8EE5-550A6575BBA3Q38714550-34BCC672-8717-4037-B86B-D3BCB5AC9912Q38809696-FDC400DC-2C17-4DA7-BC3C-F15721E5F00AQ38867769-704584AD-5B95-4F7D-BBBB-FB41AD6EF093Q38941340-19FFF920-6524-47FE-B03F-A78E5895E715Q39094309-B8F5454D-85F2-42B9-AFDF-C08E9E743E21Q39381671-E52BE818-044E-4DD6-9240-7E71046C2D4FQ39630227-06CDF46A-F3E3-4F12-9F21-AA85FDDFE044Q40707105-63E742B5-FBC6-4489-90E4-B68244A48A79Q40775665-4A8657C1-C704-488A-99CC-3144979CDF4CQ40776801-218D9266-4251-4A96-9596-A0E109AE9464Q40857816-D4F5668A-E2D2-4B0A-A91D-2BA162192CD0Q41035267-269F77C0-A391-4EEC-89CA-64B77692EBC3Q41520182-F72D9D75-B36E-46AA-8788-67CD649DE5AFQ47873859-6C957078-680C-4A9F-B7CD-029D4D88F08AQ48310969-C26CE797-129F-47E0-AAF9-B26A773AE02BQ50447526-0103F591-7B86-44CB-A28C-855551E67EBFQ51746693-99C30C4C-C81B-4E89-8E2F-6E803625C474Q53067875-00186AB8-C4A2-4B48-BEC0-48C26BA601ACQ55286513-40EF739F-713B-4C68-91E8-6E7FD8E41A3EQ58734066-C110EF7B-6953-4214-ADDD-CC7A8F486205
P2860
Potential advantages of robotic radical gastrectomy for gastric adenocarcinoma in comparison with conventional laparoscopic approach: a single institutional retrospective comparative cohort study.
description
2014 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2014年の論文
@ja
2014年学术文章
@wuu
2014年学术文章
@zh
2014年学术文章
@zh-cn
2014年学术文章
@zh-hans
2014年学术文章
@zh-my
2014年学术文章
@zh-sg
2014年學術文章
@yue
2014年學術文章
@zh-hant
name
Potential advantages of roboti ...... tive comparative cohort study.
@en
Potential advantages of roboti ...... tive comparative cohort study.
@nl
type
label
Potential advantages of roboti ...... tive comparative cohort study.
@en
Potential advantages of roboti ...... tive comparative cohort study.
@nl
prefLabel
Potential advantages of roboti ...... tive comparative cohort study.
@en
Potential advantages of roboti ...... tive comparative cohort study.
@nl
P2093
P2860
P1433
P1476
Potential advantages of roboti ...... tive comparative cohort study.
@en
P2093
Ichiro Uyama
Koichi Suda
Mariko Man-I
Seiji Satoh
Yoshinori Ishida
Yuichiro Kawamura
P2860
P2888
P304
P356
10.1007/S00464-014-3718-0
P407
P577
2014-07-17T00:00:00Z