An evaluation of patient preference for an alternative insulin delivery system compared to standard vial and syringe.
about
Evolving trends in insulin delivery in pursuit of improvements in diabetes management.Expectations about and experiences with insulin therapy contribute to diabetes treatment satisfaction in insulin-naïve patients with type 2 diabetes.Novopen Echo® for the delivery of insulin: a comparison of usability, functionality and preference among pediatric subjects, their parents, and health care professionalsPreferences related to attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and its treatment.Comparison of a novel insulin bolus-patch with pen/syringe injection to deliver mealtime insulin for efficacy, preference, and quality of life in adults with diabetes: a randomized, crossover, multicenter studyWhat can we learn from patient-reported outcomes of insulin pen devices?Evaluation of the Dual-Chamber Pen Design for the Injection of Exenatide Once Weekly for the Treatment of Type 2 DiabetesAnalysis of comparison of patient preference for two insulin injection pen devices in relation to patient dexterity skillsImproving treatment satisfaction and other patient-reported outcomes in people with type 2 diabetes: the role of once-daily insulin glargine.Addressing the need for increased adherence to multiple sclerosis therapy: can delivery technology enhance patient motivation?Insulin delivery by injection in children and adolescents with diabetes.FlexTouch® for the delivery of insulin: technical attributes and perception among patients and healthcare professionals.Empowering people with diabetes: improving perceptions and outcomes with technical advances in insulin pens.Patient preferences for the treatment of type 2 diabetes: a scoping review.A Systematic Review of Patients' Perspectives on the Subcutaneous Route of Medication Administration.In pursuit of excellence in diabetes care: trends in insulin delivery.HumaPen Memoir: a novel insulin-injecting pen with a dose-memory feature.Insulin pen-the "iPod" for insulin delivery (why pen wins over syringe)An analysis of patient acceptance and safety of a prefilled insulin injection device.Incretin-based therapies for type 2 diabetes: a nurse's perspective.Subcutaneous adipose tissue thickness in adults - correlation with BMI and recommendations for pen needle lengths for subcutaneous self-injection.Practical considerations in clinical strategy to support the development of injectable drug-device combination products for biologics.Clinical and economic outcomes among patients with diabetes mellitus initiating insulin glargine pen versus vial.Health outcomes and economic impact of therapy conversion to a biphasic insulin analog pen among privately insured patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.Evaluation of injection force of three insulin delivery pens.
P2860
Q33932057-EE59226D-6C76-4DD2-B5D2-E0D84A7AD5EEQ33996818-FF643DEF-CA49-4436-B1E1-52B1F4C6A2B8Q34420016-83A3259B-8B5A-432A-BDBD-D58536E593E6Q34554897-91A94397-AF69-46C6-9446-0651DFB526FDQ35137867-85998FD4-7B75-4DF7-8AF1-6304271A783CQ35685005-907B8F49-7042-4718-AE0C-00422A20943FQ35918380-BC6C73F9-7804-4331-8E78-5CD5228F8315Q36229341-4448C9F7-5936-47CB-B232-73AAFCDD9938Q37199322-F52A66C7-9ECC-443C-AF70-48FA5D30AD04Q37564531-6DB53F44-FF8E-4536-B05E-725A4DC967A5Q37863741-155A3B65-B5AF-44D7-BA56-F524549ED47EQ37999471-90FF3ECA-C68C-4842-80FC-6203EA9CADBAQ38055295-A8584048-3272-4F7E-9662-EEABD1BD332FQ38148000-1EC5CB46-157E-40F6-9173-F8F66A3BA405Q38705140-A415041B-A351-4036-B48B-D59BB9D19F16Q39572372-7441A51E-7B2A-413A-BD99-6066E3458F47Q39823038-B31FEE0A-6839-42F9-ADDE-E2FA26444F33Q41872671-4565391E-8DBE-48D2-8759-22A6A4F7209FQ41982128-EC44AEE6-0BB4-41F6-BA4C-EFC948F95F00Q42748385-BC774F97-302C-4630-A36F-9085CBE1A911Q43477736-77145319-DB71-4CBF-BD5D-BDCA8C9B5D77Q49881176-FAFEDF61-82EE-4057-9D19-8759AAA2EF75Q50924825-C8DF2A2F-9062-4B3F-9460-EE0FFB8849DAQ50969719-DFBBEA72-9B64-47DE-A300-21C881840216Q54742964-1E2AD9E7-EDD0-4856-A49F-0B945FF728FD
P2860
An evaluation of patient preference for an alternative insulin delivery system compared to standard vial and syringe.
description
2007 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2007年の論文
@ja
2007年学术文章
@wuu
2007年学术文章
@zh
2007年学术文章
@zh-cn
2007年学术文章
@zh-hans
2007年学术文章
@zh-my
2007年学术文章
@zh-sg
2007年學術文章
@yue
2007年學術文章
@zh-hant
name
An evaluation of patient prefe ...... to standard vial and syringe.
@en
An evaluation of patient prefe ...... to standard vial and syringe.
@nl
type
label
An evaluation of patient prefe ...... to standard vial and syringe.
@en
An evaluation of patient prefe ...... to standard vial and syringe.
@nl
prefLabel
An evaluation of patient prefe ...... to standard vial and syringe.
@en
An evaluation of patient prefe ...... to standard vial and syringe.
@nl
P2093
P356
P1476
An evaluation of patient prefe ...... to standard vial and syringe.
@en
P2093
Ann Vanderplas
David Cobden
Eunice Chang
Karen Stockl
Lars Nicklasson
William Lyness
P304
P356
10.1185/030079906X159524
P407
P577
2007-01-01T00:00:00Z