Comparison of relative risks obtained in ecological and individual studies: some methodological considerations.
about
Designs for the combination of group- and individual-level dataHealth and respirable particulate (PM10) air pollution: a causal or statistical association?A hierarchical aggregate data model with spatially correlated disease rates.Network meta-analysis of individual and aggregate level data.Dietary habits and breast cancer: a comparative study of United States and Italian data.Disease mapping and spatial regression with count data.Hierarchical models for combining ecological and case-control data.Colorectal cancer in the north and south of Ireland 1950-1984.Ecological Inference in the Social SciencesGeographic variations in risk: adjusting for unmeasured confounders through joint modeling of multiple diseases.Effectiveness of tobacco control television advertising in changing tobacco use in England: a population-based cross-sectional study.Incorporating spatial variability within epidemiological studies of environmental exposures.A review of multilevel theory for ecologic analyses.The semi-individual study in air pollution epidemiology: a valid design as compared to ecologic studies.Principles of study design in environmental epidemiologyBayes computation for ecological inference.Level of aggregation for optimal epidemiological analysis: the case of time to surgery and unnecessary removal of the normal appendix.Geographical pattern of brain cancer incidence in the Navarre and Basque Country regions of Spain.Taking the aggravation out of data aggregation: A conceptual guide to dealing with statistical issues related to the pooling of individual-level observational data.Bias magnification in ecologic studies: a methodological investigation.Spatial clustering and local risk of leprosy in São Paulo, Brazil.Analysis of the effects of ultrafine particulate matter while accounting for human exposureIncorporating marginal covariate information in a nonparametric regression model for a sample of R x C tables.Air pollution and health in Scotland: a multicity study.Using a chemistry transport model to account for the spatial variability of exposure concentrations in epidemiologic air pollution studies.Multi-level modelling, the ecologic fallacy, and hybrid study designs.An ecological study of trends in cancer incidence and dietary changes in Hong Kong.Spatial-temporal Variations of Bovine Tuberculosis Incidence in France between 1965 and 2000.Arsenic in drinking water and mortality from vascular disease: an ecologic analysis in 30 counties in the United States.Accommodating the ecological fallacy in disease mapping in the absence of individual exposures.Outdoor NOx and stroke mortality: adjusting for small area level smoking prevalence using a Bayesian approach.Why health care process performance measures can have different relationships to outcomes for patients and hospitals: understanding the ecological fallacy.Spatial Aggregation and the Ecological Fallacy
P2860
Q27690312-511024A6-D881-4367-BBE7-A7DD799447B5Q28768740-DAB8F82A-2B65-4EB0-8D63-9BF2233A72EAQ30757273-CE68A7DC-7C62-41EE-95A6-8BB255297FF7Q30969336-73ADF5C5-1DFC-4A14-BF8E-A25B2BFD807FQ31037869-7D1853FF-A296-4A3B-905A-9B86CA6F6E67Q31047562-05155EA4-B405-442E-8383-1978F01A3E0FQ31109943-B887A6F6-E4DD-4848-81B7-067D3E079BABQ33705079-0882B1E8-6A17-4D77-A991-97786581CAD5Q33913876-E61743A0-7C79-4E57-8D03-C5D0A416C726Q33941937-AC9F25BD-FB49-4DA2-A95C-D18FA198B141Q33967246-C9F06A69-646C-45AE-BCAE-1CBCD4DC5E08Q34224182-7D58184B-FA6C-415D-9FF6-790C1D624F4FQ34507180-9F4D98A4-7C10-4829-A215-5E66E3DE8BB3Q34641007-78829B0E-0A05-401C-9557-77568406522FQ34845134-C53F055D-BDFF-4982-BD7A-AC07133CC47EQ35227401-C82219A1-2246-4749-8B1B-7E5661E13094Q35404272-5BC616B7-2406-4570-84B2-A1CA4F7DE9DAQ35498955-857689F6-0782-4930-883F-C98A77C17EDCQ35587055-D2E99162-D8FF-4278-9C60-065F3643A749Q35968053-11EDDDEE-A230-4733-8CAC-D6C2CE908AE7Q36291536-5F978937-B77F-4F42-932B-12618DF68B3EQ37286444-9A8F55DA-0C0A-4E4E-A7A3-4CBE823D8628Q37294952-285499C9-D398-4D92-8177-DDD732BC42EAQ39881668-46A1D3B9-2456-4E4B-8868-C8E67ADF7CAEQ39974278-771ACAB6-0CA6-44AB-B4DD-905EC268C53DQ43152629-0E46C4A3-6972-45B9-86C6-883CA4FEB470Q43703885-DEC6E00A-BF6E-4534-A43C-122A3F2D4D60Q44119968-59660183-DB23-4D68-89C5-3A89628B0F2AQ46619067-CD8AEB94-8EE2-493F-902E-14F9B5115B7EQ47956156-58BC9687-36F7-4184-A647-5FFDF2CD45D2Q51929337-77421A54-F248-46FA-AD66-4F70670961D1Q53086972-25FCA951-C3E3-44D9-8D4F-A87552207602Q56839473-9FE1778D-7B00-4477-A7EC-C956B6459B7B
P2860
Comparison of relative risks obtained in ecological and individual studies: some methodological considerations.
description
1987 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
1987年の論文
@ja
1987年学术文章
@wuu
1987年学术文章
@zh-cn
1987年学术文章
@zh-hans
1987年学术文章
@zh-my
1987年学术文章
@zh-sg
1987年學術文章
@yue
1987年學術文章
@zh
1987年學術文章
@zh-hant
name
Comparison of relative risks o ...... methodological considerations.
@en
Comparison of relative risks o ...... methodological considerations.
@nl
type
label
Comparison of relative risks o ...... methodological considerations.
@en
Comparison of relative risks o ...... methodological considerations.
@nl
prefLabel
Comparison of relative risks o ...... methodological considerations.
@en
Comparison of relative risks o ...... methodological considerations.
@nl
P356
P1476
Comparison of relative risks o ...... methodological considerations.
@en
P2093
P304
P356
10.1093/IJE/16.1.111
P577
1987-03-01T00:00:00Z