A comparison of two techniques for manual ventilation of the lungs by non-anaesthetists: the bag-valve-facemask and the cuffed oropharyngeal airway (COPA) apparatus.
about
Feasibility of LMA Supreme for airway management in unconscious patients by ALS paramedics.Evaluation of Bag-Valve-Mask Ventilation in Manikin Studies: What Are the Current Limitations?Modeling the dynamics of recruitment and derecruitment in mice with acute lung injury.The performances of standard and ResMed masks during bag-valve-mask ventilation.Pre-hospital airway management by non-physicians in Northern Finland -- a cross-sectional survey.A comparison of the laryngeal mask airway with facemask and oropharyngeal airway for manual ventilation by critical care nurses in children.
P2860
A comparison of two techniques for manual ventilation of the lungs by non-anaesthetists: the bag-valve-facemask and the cuffed oropharyngeal airway (COPA) apparatus.
description
2001 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2001年の論文
@ja
2001年学术文章
@wuu
2001年学术文章
@zh
2001年学术文章
@zh-cn
2001年学术文章
@zh-hans
2001年学术文章
@zh-my
2001年学术文章
@zh-sg
2001年學術文章
@yue
2001年學術文章
@zh-hant
name
A comparison of two techniques ...... ngeal airway (COPA) apparatus.
@en
A comparison of two techniques ...... he cuffed oropharyngeal airway
@nl
type
label
A comparison of two techniques ...... ngeal airway (COPA) apparatus.
@en
A comparison of two techniques ...... he cuffed oropharyngeal airway
@nl
prefLabel
A comparison of two techniques ...... ngeal airway (COPA) apparatus.
@en
A comparison of two techniques ...... he cuffed oropharyngeal airway
@nl
P2093
P2860
P1433
P1476
A comparison of two techniques ...... ngeal airway (COPA) apparatus.
@en
P2093
Clayton TJ
Gabbott DA
Pittman JA
P2860
P304
P356
10.1046/J.1365-2044.2001.02090.X
P407
P577
2001-08-01T00:00:00Z