A 15-year national follow-up: legislation is not enough to reduce the use of seclusion and restraint.
about
A cross-sectional prospective study of seclusion, restraint and involuntary medication in acute psychiatric wards: patient, staff and ward characteristics.Staff's normative attitudes towards coercion: the role of moral doubt and professional context-a cross-sectional survey studyPsychiatrists' attitudes towards the procedure of involuntary admission to mental hospitals in China.The effects of a nationwide program to reduce seclusion in the Netherlands.Safewards: the empirical basis of the model and a critical appraisal.Chemical restraint in routine clinical practice: a report from a general hospital psychiatric ward in Greece.TREC-SAVE: a randomised trial comparing mechanical restraints with use of seclusion for aggressive or violent seriously mentally ill people: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.A review of ecological factors affecting inpatient psychiatric unit violence: implications for relational and unit cultural improvements.Use of coercive physical measures in a psychiatric ward of a general hospital in Greece.The reasons for using restraint and seclusion in psychiatric inpatient care: A nationwide 15-year study.A review of interventions to reduce mechanical restraint and seclusion among adult psychiatric inpatients.Corrupted cultures in mental health inpatient settings. Is restraint reduction the answer?Mechanical restraint in psychiatry: preventive factors in theory and practice. A Danish-Norwegian association study.Patterns of Restraint Utilization in a Community Hospital's Psychiatric Inpatient Units.eLearning course may shorten the duration of mechanical restraint among psychiatric inpatients: a cluster-randomized trial.Psychiatric Nurses' Emotional and Ethical Experiences Regarding Seclusion and Restraint.East London Modified-Broset as Decision-Making Tool to Predict Seclusion in Psychiatric Intensive Care Units.Mechanical restraint in adolescent psychiatry: a Finnish Register study.Restraint and seclusion: the perspective of service users and staff members.Influence of patient characteristics on duration of seclusion/restrain in acute psychiatric settings in Japan.The use of coercive measures in adolescent psychiatric inpatient treatment: a nation-wide register study.Effects of a Regulatory Protocol for Mechanical Restraint and Coercion in a Spanish Psychiatric Ward.Do patient and ward-related characteristics influence the use of coercive measures? Results from the EUNOMIA international study.Seclusion and restraint in psychiatry: patients' experiences and practical suggestions on how to improve practices and use alternatives.Use of mechanical and pharmacological restraint over an eight-year period and its relation to clinical factors.Outcomes of the Victorian Safewards trial in 13 wards: Impact on seclusion rates and fidelity measurement.Effectiveness of a Multimodal Intervention Program for Restraint Prevention in an Acute Spanish Psychiatric Ward.Parental Perceptions of the Use of Coercive Measures on Children with Developmental Disabilities.Correlates of restraint and seclusion for adults with intellectual disabilities in community services.Secluded/restrained patients' perceptions of their treatment: validity and reliability of a new questionnaire.Psychiatric nurse staffing in hospitals: is it adequate?Involuntary admission in Norwegian adult psychiatric hospitals: a systematic review.
P2860
Q33549963-BE166F22-4E01-4AAC-A56E-C1E9385D2E11Q33730912-BEC8AF51-8DAD-4D3E-AE7C-CFBC259AD3E9Q33941006-16B5A1A7-D86F-4696-9C7A-3FBB3ABC8788Q34515167-F97E3E4C-6332-48BF-A4EE-25C921BC069AQ34541347-7DDC2955-F36A-4B04-AE52-CB40B57676AEQ34633277-1E20493D-C0EA-4165-9284-45FBCB903292Q35158357-DE80DFC9-F382-407D-A207-440D18CF5A1AQ37442720-8034D474-B851-4C45-97FD-CEC17C277CB5Q37560448-0D8487C9-9968-4BDD-BB85-963F278F81AFQ37626026-615C06E6-C4D1-4DCF-BE7B-FAEBF6F6CCD2Q37745018-72B5D7D7-90CC-4D2A-8234-D46A4A9827BCQ38013269-C5CACA49-34C0-4F89-AFFA-C5322266E3D6Q38231449-51AD2858-5F89-4459-839B-1DB777A1F099Q38433747-B5C08B97-0E7A-4911-B6A2-5A7D27ACDB62Q39307937-AE4CD873-9AFA-466F-9ACC-A6A4EA82A85FQ39803719-26162315-3708-4601-8990-4941CEB31A01Q42372820-46434BEC-E167-4D6B-9F0B-C1BD658E573BQ42657181-0BABFA83-F6ED-4F77-B3EA-4841EBAF8657Q43451808-E57321EA-9F78-4384-B0CA-14CF82F73A66Q43542650-EB9AC073-26B8-4EC7-B71F-C72D152CA379Q43719868-28EDA6C7-8185-4E0D-B0FF-D6C875FC43E5Q44756464-68FF0DF3-DD89-41BD-9915-4A36EFCB145AQ44933318-228479EF-D43F-468E-B6FB-F1CC52A59058Q46860984-77592164-7CDF-4BCB-8EB7-C8E795AA0898Q47298813-9A34D3B9-C114-424A-A968-6F8BE0B2519DQ47610378-43D8BCB5-BFEE-4924-B451-DB2CF70FF006Q48821571-11484B23-3222-4080-8C67-7B93E8D74BE6Q50596226-CF4D1535-9407-4A3B-AD17-164E64025E5EQ50743576-EB7A7B93-396B-470D-A8F5-BCF539EF78D4Q50751860-08A44600-6630-4FF3-A643-7C4B3C3DB2A7Q50776100-E1950558-D67B-4E04-A09B-9CC7069D11C7Q55100363-FB7C6C0C-C92F-4263-8680-F694400268AA
P2860
A 15-year national follow-up: legislation is not enough to reduce the use of seclusion and restraint.
description
2007 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2007年の論文
@ja
2007年学术文章
@wuu
2007年学术文章
@zh
2007年学术文章
@zh-cn
2007年学术文章
@zh-hans
2007年学术文章
@zh-my
2007年学术文章
@zh-sg
2007年學術文章
@yue
2007年學術文章
@zh-hant
name
A 15-year national follow-up: ...... se of seclusion and restraint.
@en
A 15-year national follow-up: ...... se of seclusion and restraint.
@nl
type
label
A 15-year national follow-up: ...... se of seclusion and restraint.
@en
A 15-year national follow-up: ...... se of seclusion and restraint.
@nl
prefLabel
A 15-year national follow-up: ...... se of seclusion and restraint.
@en
A 15-year national follow-up: ...... se of seclusion and restraint.
@nl
P2093
P2860
P1476
A 15-year national follow-up: ...... se of seclusion and restraint.
@en
P2093
Alice Keski-Valkama
Anna-Maija Koivisto
Eila Sailas
Markku Eronen
P2860
P304
P356
10.1007/S00127-007-0219-7
P577
2007-06-27T00:00:00Z