The effect of union type on psychological well-being: depression among cohabitors versus marrieds.
about
Sad, blue, or depressed days, health behaviors and health-related quality of life, Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, 1995-2000Accounting for the physical and mental health benefits of entry into marriage: a genetically informed study of selection and causation.Changing gender roles and attitudes and their implications for well-being around the new millennium.Factors influencing risky single occasion drinking in Canada and policy implications.Stability and Change in Family Structure and Maternal Health Trajectories.Is Maternal Marriage Beneficial for Low-Income Adolescents?Gender differences in family formation behavior: the effects of adolescent substance use.Cigarette Smoking in Same-Sex and Different-Sex Unions: The Role of Socioeconomic and Psychological Factors.Combating unmeasured confounding in cross-sectional studies: evaluating instrumental-variable and Heckman selection models.How Similar are Cohabiting and Married Parents? Second Conception Risks by Union Type in the United States and Across EuropeRelationship quality among cohabitors and marrieds in older adulthoodPotential predictors of delay in initial treatment contact after the first onset of depression in Japan: a clinical sample studyThe prevalence and determinants of antepartum mental health problems among women in the USA: a nationally representative population-based study.Neighborhood Poverty and Maternal Fears of Children's Outdoor Play.Partnership history and mental health over timeNonmarital Childbearing, Union History, and Women's Health at Midlife.Hard Times and Heart Break: Linking Economic Hardship and Relationship DistressMarital birth and early child outcomes: the moderating influence of marriage propensity.Re-Examining the Case for Marriage: Union Formation and Changes in Well-Being.A Longitudinal Investigation of Commitment Dynamics in Cohabiting Relationships.Strained Dating Relationships, A Sense of Mattering and Emerging Adults' Depressive SymptomsMarriage and mental health among young adults.Union Type and Depressive Symptoms Among Mexican Adults.Is It Attachment Style or Socio-Demography: Singlehood in a Representative SampleMarriage, Relationship Quality, and Sleep among U.S. Older Adults.Family structure transitions and changes in maternal resources and well-beingFamily structure and fathers' well-being: trajectories of mental health and self-rated healthLiving arrangements and mental health in Finland.Relationship Status and Long-Term Care Facility Use in Later LifeThe Benefits from Marriage and Religion in the United States: A Comparative Analysis.Family Structure, Family Stability, and Outcomes of Five-Year-Old Children.Marriage Following Adolescent Parenthood: Relationship to Adult Well-being.The Relationship Context of Premarital Serial Cohabitation.Born to be happy? The etiology of subjective well-being.Economic Hardship, Parents' Depression, and Relationship Distress among Couples With Young Children.The impact of civil union legislation on minority stress, depression, and hazardous drinking in a diverse sample of sexual-minority women: A quasi-natural experimentPsychological Well-Being among Older Adults: The Role of Partnership Status.Family Transitions in Cohabiting Families: a Longitudinal Investigation of the Role of Parent Depressive Symptoms in Youth Problem Behaviors.Mental Well-Being Differences in Cohabitation and Marriage: The Role of Childhood Selection.Cohabitation and mental health: Is psychotropic medication use more common in cohabitation than marriage?
P2860
Q24801083-96062F62-FC76-453E-9075-5C7FDFE22296Q30419397-BADB8271-0054-47F8-AC25-414D407A84CDQ33624259-CE6E1F1F-1C2F-49E4-A392-8C6523A30715Q33681679-62D87F43-1AC7-443F-AA0C-55C2384A3970Q33747093-4F61243E-31ED-4B17-A917-40DBF630004DQ33854635-104ADBBC-7E5F-4030-B7F0-CB8DB056969FQ34248230-A8089D75-6807-4C76-815F-2B89C842201DQ34378198-47BE406B-433F-495C-A9CA-EE4CF6066986Q34442580-6529F1D3-DBD4-4722-B77F-39252C8EE98CQ34456398-1EFE6C6B-CAA5-4259-8C04-57A04C84F30AQ34472314-D98DF1C6-5F3B-40F1-B075-DD455884A3B0Q34740489-3EA79CE0-5A3F-4472-84E4-4ABE3DB3D7B1Q34979234-DEB028D0-B186-4DB9-A4DD-066A582D6226Q35210725-98B04715-9169-490E-A1AE-45A00ABD0415Q35559297-845962B9-417D-45E1-BFA2-212880942664Q35627637-4B0744C5-746B-47EF-981B-B86CDB4584BAQ35751355-97A118B6-CAC5-47A4-BDCB-CE8CDEAB625CQ35928618-3318209C-78C2-4B03-A217-F741CE1B7091Q35959879-FF0D3291-53D6-40E2-BA50-5B44CE20EFF1Q36039095-46C936C2-A151-4ABD-B77E-F83392AD36B0Q36058097-D8285BCB-49AA-470C-9BF1-8CB1220A4156Q36079696-7EBA972B-505D-4C5E-B007-8F22012960C7Q36105995-24754E52-0636-4380-AFDF-84340E7B061DQ36265436-7EBB6364-1EA6-46FF-8650-7ED3AF3C910EQ36367573-79A5013B-C20B-4418-9A10-80233CA6C5AAQ36605644-CFF1B707-9BC8-4D48-B4E5-45CD78BFE6F7Q36632299-28174FC2-4B7C-4699-A588-504D47B4D3FCQ36928883-1CD3EE2E-DAA5-46F6-8CA3-3F39C7DA320DQ36994791-75DDFE31-F6AA-42BC-AE8C-693D6543762AQ37038112-949386D9-1009-4CF4-8935-E9C8C17AA5D7Q37249744-C7A80BCC-F34E-4D3E-87CA-EAA4F75E76C9Q37262213-1FF00EFA-7B73-4170-805C-F63E49AE8D1EQ37417498-25F83C18-7B46-48D5-991E-F64698E5AC99Q37428789-2689DB71-9926-468A-BBF6-A1E6134431C8Q37484162-9AD84F22-10B4-4714-8B7A-0FDAF8E63889Q37718832-45B7AF91-566A-4545-AF59-59463A30D308Q38720171-8BD32572-9E68-4344-872A-1C515A445F54Q40401667-79EF6E4B-A43C-42C4-9634-FA31E7EB40A9Q49886116-373A7B47-1137-4AB2-A2DC-C165664950E8Q55064830-3D4B3989-5280-4797-B2D5-8A05E0E27C00
P2860
The effect of union type on psychological well-being: depression among cohabitors versus marrieds.
description
2000 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2000年の論文
@ja
2000年学术文章
@wuu
2000年学术文章
@zh
2000年学术文章
@zh-cn
2000年学术文章
@zh-hans
2000年学术文章
@zh-my
2000年学术文章
@zh-sg
2000年學術文章
@yue
2000年學術文章
@zh-hant
name
The effect of union type on ps ...... ng cohabitors versus marrieds.
@en
The effect of union type on ps ...... ng cohabitors versus marrieds.
@nl
type
label
The effect of union type on ps ...... ng cohabitors versus marrieds.
@en
The effect of union type on ps ...... ng cohabitors versus marrieds.
@nl
prefLabel
The effect of union type on ps ...... ng cohabitors versus marrieds.
@en
The effect of union type on ps ...... ng cohabitors versus marrieds.
@nl
P1476
The effect of union type on ps ...... ong cohabitors versus marrieds
@en
P2093
P304
P577
2000-09-01T00:00:00Z