Playing dice with criminal sentences: the influence of irrelevant anchors on experts' judicial decision making.
about
Understanding Decision Making in Critical CareExtraneous factors in judicial decisionsSight over sound in the judgment of music performance.Heidegger, lived experience and method.The Too-Much-Precision Effect.Cognitive neuroscience in forensic science: understanding and utilizing the human element.The Clinical Assessment in the Legal Field: An Empirical Study of Bias and Limitations in Forensic Expertise.The anchoring bias reflects rational use of cognitive resources.Anchoring revisited: the role of the comparative question.A versatile task for assessing decision-making abilities: the truck dispatcher framework.Motivated Use of Numerical Anchors for Judgments Relevant to the Self.Anchors weigh more than power: why absolute powerlessness liberates negotiators to achieve better outcomes.Reasons Pro et Contra as a Debiasing Technique in Legal Contexts.The anchoring effect in metamemory monitoring.Anchor effects in decision making can be reduced by the interaction between goal monitoring and the level of the decision maker's executive functions.Resisting anchoring effects: The roles of metric and mapping knowledge.The animal in you: animalistic descriptions of a violent crime increase punishment of perpetrator.Importance of risk comparison for individual and societal decision-making after the Fukushima disaster.Paying for someone else's mistake: the effect of bystander negligence on perpetrator blame.
P2860
Q26783071-67887B8F-620F-4CEE-90B8-71622934B69FQ28235291-31BEA8A8-5815-4975-B7B1-B55C20BFB8BFQ30352971-DFBC6F42-BCF3-4A5A-AC3B-3E403DB27F32Q30356116-33F499F4-BF6D-4056-AEEE-54771B72CFCDQ30490261-CD384E97-78A3-45FA-946C-9FF6BAC2EAD0Q36087953-BFAB363B-318E-4E5E-8A3D-D119EEC1A8B5Q38663428-6D635BFF-F91D-4175-A828-DA412A33E30EQ39292938-C1716695-DD8C-4448-AAE0-8E26228F2A92Q41871680-938122EC-1D14-4361-927F-847B91F23BF3Q44110334-33CCAB16-E895-4939-97F7-6BA1D1209562Q47321024-7695A081-6D45-4265-9FF0-DB292C539B5FQ47697063-7A82F541-4454-4934-B172-384247CC984AQ47753000-0246F7EC-20C2-4DA3-8BE9-3342CE345A22Q47824211-B7483577-B397-4D4A-9339-D6BE818BE003Q47964675-8C089FB6-BE03-4369-BE94-FA9C491BA642Q48039961-819D28C0-FE34-4CC9-A0A5-ECE3107C8B26Q48091901-E35431D6-9FCB-4B9C-967E-E114E82BB22FQ50113886-D665C66B-277F-4466-9BBA-A2D2916E2A13Q50785436-EFA883B9-82FD-4FC9-8B0F-48D1DD746384
P2860
Playing dice with criminal sentences: the influence of irrelevant anchors on experts' judicial decision making.
description
2006 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2006年の論文
@ja
2006年学术文章
@wuu
2006年学术文章
@zh-cn
2006年学术文章
@zh-hans
2006年学术文章
@zh-my
2006年学术文章
@zh-sg
2006年學術文章
@yue
2006年學術文章
@zh
2006年學術文章
@zh-hant
name
Playing dice with criminal sen ...... rts' judicial decision making.
@en
Playing dice with criminal sen ...... rts' judicial decision making.
@nl
type
label
Playing dice with criminal sen ...... rts' judicial decision making.
@en
Playing dice with criminal sen ...... rts' judicial decision making.
@nl
prefLabel
Playing dice with criminal sen ...... rts' judicial decision making.
@en
Playing dice with criminal sen ...... rts' judicial decision making.
@nl
P2093
P2860
P356
P1476
Playing dice with criminal sen ...... rts' judicial decision making.
@en
P2093
Birte Englich
Fritz Strack
Thomas Mussweiler
P2860
P304
P356
10.1177/0146167205282152
P577
2006-02-01T00:00:00Z