about
Accuracy of Outcome Anticipation, But Not Gaze Behavior, Differs Against Left- and Right-Handed Penalties in Team-Handball Goalkeeping.How to Trick Your Opponent: A Review Article on Deceptive Actions in Interactive SportsIndividual differences in reading social intentions from motor deviants.Brain regions concerned with the identification of deceptive soccer moves by higher-skilled and lower-skilled players.Domain-Specific and Unspecific Reaction Times in Experienced Team Handball Goalkeepers and Novices.Fooling the kickers but not the goalkeepers: behavioral and neurophysiological correlates of fake action detection in soccer.Time to broaden the scope of research on anticipatory behavior: a case for the role of probabilistic information.Biomechanical analysis of anticipation of elite and inexperienced goalkeepers to distance shots in handball.Deception Detection in Action: Embodied Simulation in Antisocial Human Interactions.Neurophysiological studies may provide a misleading picture of how perceptual-motor interactions are coordinated.Examination of gaze behaviors under in situ and video simulation task constraints reveals differences in information pickup for perception and action.Availability of advance visual information constrains association-football goalkeeping performance during penalty kicks.Skill level and graphical detail shape perceptual judgments in tennis.Athletes and novices are differently capable to recognize feint and non-feint actions.Sitting on a fastball.Expertise and gambling: using type 2 signal detection theory to investigate differences between regular gamblers and nongamblers.Perceptual training effects on anticipation of direct and deceptive 7-m throws in handballAnticipatory strategies of team-handball goalkeepersControl over the processing of the opponent's gaze direction in basketball expertsJudgement bias in predicting the success of one's own basketball free throws but not those of othersThe Effect of Blurred Perceptual Training on the Decision Making of Skilled Football RefereesStepovers and Signal Detection: Response Sensitivity and Bias in the Differentiation of Genuine and Deceptive Football ActionsThe Perception of Deceptive Information Can Be Enhanced by Training That Removes Superficial Visual Information
P2860
Q27305620-D8B4EA7A-88D3-4227-A03E-651029D6979CQ30853997-BC217DBB-D48D-48E3-83BA-03302E2E0FB2Q35959870-9E0475ED-35BB-4650-9593-E6ED2465905EQ37398533-E6898C59-C44A-47B5-ACB3-0E78BEE2F97EQ38905347-EA6BCA46-86AF-4A0D-9642-B6E8C73A43D9Q39559592-7AF56223-2C79-4C21-BD04-3DBE6010BF7FQ41469554-3A505900-43B7-4763-A2C3-19AC08380421Q41496246-EAB2241D-D57B-4C0C-8B43-127A6D8C5DEEQ42323653-330679FC-E3FA-4047-97CE-E38F2BDBE770Q43118098-37B1D2F4-C134-466E-925F-5952E67C6628Q45234751-A11B884E-785C-43B6-8A8A-7EBF62C28C37Q46541262-EF6532B3-879B-4FF7-80A1-56FEB9C41450Q48531166-3250BC67-7A1A-4A76-A748-5FDE5B911E95Q49145104-69A88CDE-C03C-4061-810B-66A3A5AAD762Q51032664-A5955345-1E8A-41E7-BDF9-B3BFF3A684C5Q51857482-B9593B62-B6B5-48BD-A275-AF8E5DE993BFQ56638651-9B22DE85-EC5D-4A38-858E-DAF436E1DF1DQ56642185-4C6FACF1-4550-49A8-836D-9B0EAA17D901Q56645662-9DFC79C8-0B35-4C5B-A8BC-7332422E93F0Q56647804-56B69C2A-CD42-46BC-97DC-BD0C365F503DQ57491036-6814FD2A-FC06-4B8B-97FD-A88144C66D73Q58699096-6DA5CFE9-26A1-46A1-BA12-CF50496363F2Q58769137-BDC5EA9A-C76F-4FE0-BE6E-CE6494AA7F1B
P2860
description
2009 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2009年の論文
@ja
2009年学术文章
@wuu
2009年学术文章
@zh-cn
2009年学术文章
@zh-hans
2009年学术文章
@zh-my
2009年学术文章
@zh-sg
2009年學術文章
@yue
2009年學術文章
@zh
2009年學術文章
@zh-hant
name
Response bias in judging deceptive movements.
@en
Response bias in judging deceptive movements.
@nl
type
label
Response bias in judging deceptive movements.
@en
Response bias in judging deceptive movements.
@nl
prefLabel
Response bias in judging deceptive movements.
@en
Response bias in judging deceptive movements.
@nl
P1433
P1476
Response bias in judging deceptive movements
@en
P2093
P304
P356
10.1016/J.ACTPSY.2008.12.009
P577
2009-02-03T00:00:00Z