A comparison of endoscopic treatments in rectal carcinoid tumors.

about

Successful Removal of a Large Common Bile Duct Stone by Using Direct Peroral Cholangioscopy and Laser Lithotripsy in a Patient with Severe Kyphosis.Handling and Pathology Reporting of Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Mucosal Resection.

P2860

Q35965241-8936E3A9-78E1-4085-91E3-7648BE3092D0 Q39186512-B8C81D59-D8E9-406F-80A7-FAA5832A1349

P2860

A comparison of endoscopic treatments in rectal carcinoid tumors.

Item

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q53188544

description

2015 nî lūn-bûn

@nan

2015年の論文

@ja

2015年学术文章

@wuu

2015年学术文章

@zh

2015年学术文章

@zh-cn

2015年学术文章

@zh-hans

2015年学术文章

@zh-my

2015年学术文章

@zh-sg

2015年學術文章

@yue

2015年學術文章

@zh-hant

name

A comparison of endoscopic treatments in rectal carcinoid tumors.

@en

A comparison of endoscopic treatments in rectal carcinoid tumors.

@nl

type

Item

label

A comparison of endoscopic treatments in rectal carcinoid tumors.

@en

A comparison of endoscopic treatments in rectal carcinoid tumors.

@nl

prefLabel

A comparison of endoscopic treatments in rectal carcinoid tumors.

@en

A comparison of endoscopic treatments in rectal carcinoid tumors.

@nl

P1476

A comparison of endoscopic treatments in rectal carcinoid tumors.

@en

P2093

A Young Seo

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Cheol Min Shin

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Dong Ho Lee

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Hyuk Yoon

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Hyun Joo Lee

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Seong Beom Kim

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Young Soo Park

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P2860

An analysis of 8305 cases of carcinoid tumors.

Endoscopic mucosal resection vs endoscopic submucosal dissection for rectal carcinoid tumours: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Clinicopathological analysis of colorectal carcinoid tumors and patient outcomes.

Indications for and technical aspects of colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection

Rectal carcinoid tumors: review of results after endoscopic and surgical therapy.

Which endoscopic treatment is the best for small rectal carcinoid tumors?

Efficacy and safety of endoscopic resection therapies for rectal carcinoid tumors: a meta-analysis.

Comparison of endoscopic resection therapies for rectal carcinoid tumor: endoscopic submucosal dissection versus endoscopic mucosal resection using band ligation.

Treatment outcomes according to endoscopic treatment modalities for rectal carcinoid tumors.

Tumor size and depth predict rate of lymph node metastasis in colon carcinoids and can be used to select patients for endoscopic resection.

P2888

s00464-015-4637-4

P304

3491-3498

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P31

scholarly article

P356

10.1007/S00464-015-4637-4

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P407

English

P433

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P478

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P50

Nayoung Kim

P577

2015-10-30T00:00:00Z

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime

P698

26514133

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

A comparison of endoscopic treatments in rectal carcinoid tumors.

about

P2860

P2860

A comparison of endoscopic treatments in rectal carcinoid tumors.

description

name

type

label

prefLabel

P1433

P1476

P2093

P2860

P2888

P304

P31

P356

P407

P433

P478

P50

P577

P698

P356

P1433

P1476

P2093

P2860

P2888

P304

P31

P356

P407

P433

P478

P50

P577

P698