Follow-Up of Metal-on-Metal Hip Arthroplasty Patients Is Currently Not Evidence Based or Cost Effective.
about
Prevalence of Failure due to Adverse Reaction to Metal Debris in Modern, Medium and Large Diameter Metal-on-Metal Hip Replacements--The Effect of Novel Screening Methods: Systematic Review and Metaregression AnalysisRisk factors for failure of the 36 mm metal-on-metal Pinnacle total hip arthroplasty system: a retrospective single-centre cohort study.Which imaging modality is most effective for identifying pseudotumours in metal-on-metal hip resurfacings requiring revision: ultrasound or MARS-MRI or both?Do cobalt and chromium levels predict osteolysis in metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty?Early aseptic loosening of a mobile-bearing total knee replacement.Blood Metal Ion Thresholds to Identify Patients with Metal-on-Metal Hip Implants at Risk of Adverse Reactions to Metal Debris: An External Multicenter Validation Study of Birmingham Hip Resurfacing and Corail-Pinnacle Implants.What is appropriate surveillance for metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty patients?Metal-on-metal hip replacements: implications for general practice.Sequelae of large-head metal-on-metal hip arthroplasties: Current status and future prospects.Revision surgery of metal-on-metal hip arthroplasties for adverse reactions to metal debris.Outcomes After Metal-on-metal Hip Revision Surgery Depend on the Reason for Failure: A Propensity Score-matched Study.Diagnostic guidelines for the histological particle algorithm in the periprosthetic neo-synovial tissue
P2860
Q26765167-2602F9BD-D622-46FC-A575-3388C764C3FDQ33628763-7249E3BC-0394-4507-A35D-6FEEDF65696CQ36465776-D033F3DE-B96F-4FCF-9B64-09E69C4843BEQ39387373-C2B47EB6-8FE0-4110-86A1-9495A92A8761Q47378916-7B29D012-390B-46B6-A942-4638542CFDC5Q47659428-DF91EBBB-0294-47EB-ABDC-2268862C35E5Q47858039-A2FDBCAA-0571-4F99-882A-27FC333229C7Q49386418-7361A91E-C5D3-4D0D-B79E-491EE3A2868FQ50893730-1B67010F-14A4-410A-A5F7-6776C84923CDQ52679970-7F551468-B607-4E6C-9401-3E7F25E5E957Q52802928-AC751D2F-E1B5-4E0D-BEB9-EA6D864D2E7AQ58703121-C5A3CDAA-0BDE-44AD-9F9A-4480A17AE15B
P2860
Follow-Up of Metal-on-Metal Hip Arthroplasty Patients Is Currently Not Evidence Based or Cost Effective.
description
2015 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2015年の論文
@ja
2015年学术文章
@wuu
2015年学术文章
@zh
2015年学术文章
@zh-cn
2015年学术文章
@zh-hans
2015年学术文章
@zh-my
2015年学术文章
@zh-sg
2015年學術文章
@yue
2015年學術文章
@zh-hant
name
Follow-Up of Metal-on-Metal Hi ...... dence Based or Cost Effective.
@en
Follow-Up of Metal-on-Metal Hi ...... dence Based or Cost Effective.
@en-gb
Follow-Up of Metal-on-Metal Hi ...... dence Based or Cost Effective.
@nl
type
label
Follow-Up of Metal-on-Metal Hi ...... dence Based or Cost Effective.
@en
Follow-Up of Metal-on-Metal Hi ...... dence Based or Cost Effective.
@en-gb
Follow-Up of Metal-on-Metal Hi ...... dence Based or Cost Effective.
@nl
prefLabel
Follow-Up of Metal-on-Metal Hi ...... dence Based or Cost Effective.
@en
Follow-Up of Metal-on-Metal Hi ...... dence Based or Cost Effective.
@en-gb
Follow-Up of Metal-on-Metal Hi ...... dence Based or Cost Effective.
@nl
P1476
Follow-Up of Metal-on-Metal Hi ...... dence Based or Cost Effective.
@en
P2093
David W Murray
Gulraj S Matharu
P304
P356
10.1016/J.ARTH.2015.03.009
P577
2015-03-14T00:00:00Z