Randomized single versus double embryo transfer: obstetric and paediatric outcome and a cost-effectiveness analysis. - Wikidata - wikimedia - TriplyDB

Randomized single versus double embryo transfer: obstetric and paediatric outcome and a cost-effectiveness analysis.

Randomized single versus double embryo transfer: obstetric and paediatric outcome and a cost-effectiveness analysis.

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q53845424

about

Metabolomics for improving pregnancy outcomes in women undergoing assisted reproductive technologies Number of embryos for transfer following in vitro fertilisation or intra-cytoplasmic sperm injection Preimplantation mouse embryo selection guided by light-induced dielectrophoresis Clinical effectiveness of elective single versus double embryo transfer: meta-analysis of individual patient data from randomised trials Cost Implications for Subsequent Perinatal Outcomes After IVF Stratified by Number of Embryos Transferred: A Five Year Analysis of Vermont Data.Long term costs and effects of reducing the number of twin pregnancies in IVF by single embryo transfer: the TwinSing study.Is ICSI Risky?The effect of single embryo transfer on perinatal outcomes in Japan Single vitrified blastocyst transfer maximizes liveborn children per embryo while minimizing preterm birth.In vitro fertilization and multiple pregnancies: an evidence-based analysis.Morbidity and mortality among very preterm singletons following fertility treatment in Australia and New Zealand, a population cohort study.Long-term follow-up of children conceived through assisted reproductive technology.Economic evaluation of highly purified human menopausal gonadotropin versus recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone in fresh and frozen in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm-injection cycles in Sweden.Approaches to improve the diagnosis and management of infertility Trends in the use of intracytoplasmatic sperm injection marked variability between countries.Elective single embryo transfer: guidelines for practice British Fertility Society and Association of Clinical Embryologists.A theoretical model for single blastocyst transfer.Costs of achieving live birth from assisted reproductive technology: a comparison of sequential single and double embryo transfer approaches.Optimizing the number of embryos to transfer on day 5: two should be the limit.Is it safe to prescribe clomiphene citrate without ultrasound monitoring facilities?The paediatric consequences of Assisted Reproductive Technologies, with special emphasis on multiple pregnancies.Elective Single Embryo Transfer: an update to UK Best Practice Guidelines.Metabolomics for improving pregnancy outcomes in women undergoing assisted reproductive technologies.Double trouble: should double embryo transfer be banned?Cost-effectiveness of embryo transfer strategies: a decision analytic model using long-term costs and consequences of singletons and multiples born as a consequence of IVF.Is there a detrimental effect of higher gonadotrophin dose on clinical pregnancy rate in normo-responders undergoing ART with long protocol?Refuting a misguided campaign against the goal of single-embryo transfer and singleton birth in assisted reproduction.The impact of single embryo transfer policy on pregnancy outcomes after legislative change.Factors affecting obstetric outcome of singletons born after IVF.Treatment period and medical care costs to achieve the first live birth by assisted reproductive technology are lower in the single embryo transfer period than in the double embryo transfer period: a retrospective analysis of women younger than 40 y Autophagic activity as an indicator for selecting good quality embryos.Double embryo transfer gives good pregnancy and live birth rates in poor responders with a modest increase in multiple birth rates: results from an observational study.Cost-effective approaches to in vitro fertilization: means to improve access.Deciding how many embryos to transfer: ongoing challenges and dilemmas.The dilemma faced by patients who undergo single embryo transfer.Is mandating elective single embryo transfer ethically justifiable in young women?

P2860

Q24187540-3EA7C1BF-1171-4689-AAB8-6243940F5DED Q24201012-32B78830-D847-4622-9737-74163FF9CBDF Q27331492-43DD8574-FB77-417D-BDD7-33DEB53756B0 Q28744051-6639D0BA-CCD5-40B5-B431-00BE5E89B01A Q31057246-421D175E-286D-482B-97FA-707C29ADF63C Q33723461-E0BDA8E7-6B7C-41E8-B31C-81DAF0C325CC Q34338565-DE921A71-7D6B-4E49-AEB7-0B473A2186EB Q34784749-A10949B5-0F92-405C-88C1-48314D3ABE92 Q35689045-CE9AC688-96B4-488C-9DFA-EA1B9BF88422 Q36047003-841F4C73-7E1A-41D2-B7EB-3502723327EA Q36266707-CB03608F-B35B-4B96-974D-8ECD957D0199 Q36832799-D03A399B-C62A-4DCC-B54E-640B8AE40B48 Q37099603-20CEF488-F90D-4D98-BFB3-1E866660BFE0 Q37214916-F7C8B663-780C-4D7A-A037-839EFEE3F89D Q37245639-33B66E5A-BAF4-48F2-A273-AEAEA83B0FBA Q37259350-00D7D938-0C01-4061-B576-5BB2F4B71C62 Q37313057-C672820C-AE43-432F-B488-E1D65AC63984 Q37444447-35AD3E13-CABD-41A3-8EDC-BDAE19E5C721 Q37720448-EA9312F7-DF55-49CF-AB42-1313C3FB2A95 Q37747467-A30C6760-49B9-4F35-A579-BF2A5C2DF8D9 Q38070689-03D2254F-9D7F-4A29-AFCC-33D8D641A796 Q38590592-E1612BAA-9E97-44AF-AD5C-753982A831C7 Q38769403-1AF98B8E-88E7-4EBD-A4E9-2BAC77DFE544 Q39024784-95464800-AA8D-47E9-BF2B-87AAE71FA07A Q39138941-55846966-92FE-43A0-B00B-A0206586425B Q43431688-6AF7839B-8243-4114-A6CA-C84B4766A83D Q43476409-322EBC45-3D43-4E20-887F-E83218C13B7A Q45035182-2AFE8C39-BCA0-40ED-A3F5-74B234EA7EFB Q45081659-9EC4B816-8C08-4819-8D58-C9CBA6DBDD15 Q46710244-3E3E486F-06B7-4668-ABB2-30DD97EFDD57 Q47162647-126E66C6-8040-4EA3-8A1E-47BB1EF2E5E8 Q48678069-F3AAE1B2-DB47-40A8-8178-1B942CCCF736 Q50646891-8C63B85A-8E48-4A3B-9F16-19FC369CCCC8 Q53656880-6717DE7D-394A-487F-805D-43C840C8747C Q55114538-6409BF65-A908-45CB-AC4E-4CE877C42FC4 Q55343517-EE15A9B4-10E9-4CC0-ACB6-20C2F15384EF

P2860

Randomized single versus double embryo transfer: obstetric and paediatric outcome and a cost-effectiveness analysis.

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q53845424

description

2005 nî lūn-bûn

@nan

2005年の論文

@ja

2005年学术文章

@wuu

2005年学术文章

@zh-cn

2005年学术文章

@zh-hans

2005年学术文章

@zh-my

2005年学术文章

@zh-sg

2005年學術文章

@yue

2005年學術文章

@zh

2005年學術文章

@zh-hant

name

Randomized single versus doubl ...... a cost-effectiveness analysis.

@en

Randomized single versus doubl ...... a cost-effectiveness analysis.

@nl

type

label

Randomized single versus doubl ...... a cost-effectiveness analysis.

@en

Randomized single versus doubl ...... a cost-effectiveness analysis.

@nl

prefLabel

Randomized single versus doubl ...... a cost-effectiveness analysis.

@en

Randomized single versus doubl ...... a cost-effectiveness analysis.

@nl

P1433

Q53845424-310CAE97-22CE-44A3-A689-3BA796610DFD

P1476

Q53845424-5879B248-2C71-44E1-99E0-40BDF7670A2F

P2093

Q53845424-B2B1A1D0-BFE5-4007-853A-20EB867D04A4

Q53845424-BDCC0EE1-A3E9-410F-B780-3BB94AF30297

Q53845424-E7F95DF4-31B1-4425-9B5B-A6442EBBE91D

P2860

Q53845424-138FDF61-EB58-4681-B69E-E01F8C3E5A3E

Q53845424-30433962-8209-419C-8E61-81AA475E8854

Q53845424-4A8F5F3E-081D-42EA-9998-C434716966B2

Q53845424-66857BDF-E5A1-4868-B1D2-E7190EE3AD07

Q53845424-771D602B-E1C3-4FE0-B7E6-9796ACABCD95

Q53845424-9EF7A55A-0957-46AF-A78B-422CDF93F445

Q53845424-A863E3CB-CC7B-4700-B53C-597CF10EBE69

Q53845424-AA28A433-CDA4-4CFD-8FDD-3B562855BF50

Q53845424-B1F145CB-0E29-4EE3-B826-07102EF2287F

P304

Q53845424-D90D19E2-D13B-4E13-B6AA-887E1BB000BE

P31

Q53845424-FE9E6A3B-56B1-45DD-B5E3-3AFBF0E3D881

P356

Q53845424-112D7858-4584-4E77-9577-F8C994A2F2BB

P407

Q53845424-E48192B9-FC63-45F5-B464-2B9F12F8A9CA

P433

Q53845424-7CF3EF96-9E77-4500-9CAE-C4CDD3C0154A

P478

Q53845424-A99D88F0-1CCB-4C0E-8C8B-A27FBFF8E230

P577

Q53845424-F45D1D47-1BAF-4FB9-8010-B380C91E624A

P5875

Q53845424-A60AA2EB-F749-4018-A994-FA6BE811C441

P698

Q53845424-A0C24AD7-4F50-4786-B7CE-3A9030FC3EBA

P356

P1433

Human Reproduction

P1476

Randomized single versus doubl ...... a cost-effectiveness analysis.

@en

P2093

Ann Thurin Kjellberg

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Christina Bergh

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Per Carlsson

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P2860

Deliveries and children born after in-vitro fertilisation in Sweden 1982-95: a retrospective cohort study.

Perinatal outcomes in singletons following in vitro fertilization: a meta-analysis.

The impact of multiple preterm births on the family.

Perinatal outcome of singletons and twins after assisted conception: a systematic review of controlled studies.

Low and very low birth weight in infants conceived with use of assisted reproductive technology.

The decision rules of cost-effectiveness analysis.

A health-economic decision-analytic model comparing double with single embryo transfer in IVF/ICSI.

What is the most relevant standard of success in assisted reproduction? The singleton, term gestation, live birth rate per cycle initiated: the BESST endpoint for assisted reproduction.

A measure of parental stress in mothers with small children: dimensionality, stability and validity.

P304

210-216

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P31

scholarly article

P356

10.1093/HUMREP/DEI298

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P407

P433

1

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P478

21

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P577

2005-09-19T00:00:00Z

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime

P5875

7591945

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P698

16172148

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string