Multiple explanation: A consider-an-alternative strategy for debiasing judgments
about
Counterfactual thinking and decision making.The why's the limit: curtailing self-enhancement with explanatory introspection.A reflection and evaluation model of comparative thinking.Automated detection of heuristics and biases among pathologists in a computer-based system.Information search in the testing of quantified hypotheses: how "all," "most," "some," "few," and "none" hypotheses are tested.Giving Debiasing Away: Can Psychological Research on Correcting Cognitive Errors Promote Human Welfare?Hindsight Bias.Confirmation bias: why psychiatrists stick to wrong preliminary diagnoses.The Influence of Effortful Thought and Cognitive Proficiencies on the Conjunction Fallacy: Implications for Dual-Process Theories of Reasoning and Judgment.Effects of prior mental effort on picture processing: An ERP investigation.The details are in the field.Measuring the crowd within: probabilistic representations within individuals.Case-based clinical reasoning in feline medicine: 2: Managing cognitive error.Implications of counterfactual structure for creative generation and analytical problem solving.Evaluating everyday explanations.Political extremism is supported by an illusion of understanding.Complexity in simulation-based education: exploring the role of hindsight bias.Debiasing DecisionsReasoning Is for Arguing: Understanding the Successes and Failures of Deliberation
P2860
Q33842557-742EAF10-8252-42C4-B0FC-AF7A6249FE26Q34638715-C5E77272-C056-4712-98F0-610E3F2944CFQ35146291-57873249-77D4-4F2A-8EB2-E5482B8710EDQ37057602-AA26C062-9118-4293-9988-7B531FDA5A02Q38418135-57F95C67-5D61-48DB-9626-3D5E1CCA157CQ38544450-DA5126C5-FE40-4B24-8BBE-941CBC988170Q40744098-DD1F62F1-434E-47E1-BC2E-5146A4D34AE8Q44595856-768F6DB7-8452-4110-8D07-BAFDBBABF9A8Q47622836-9A3A9CE7-8B27-4F5E-A3A2-5DE23473C292Q47679620-BFEA1173-922E-44BB-8F0C-CDE7669838D3Q48909196-13ABC8CD-AD0E-4585-A0F2-370082B06306Q48951559-5E148459-F4B3-464E-8120-B837B0394882Q50539884-E02C6206-BDB4-4DC4-A0B6-10CB280A0788Q51993911-54F27A0A-9D95-43B4-9AAB-80BB0EA5C4CEQ52705569-97120BCE-727E-4590-91D4-7F813E47EB86Q52841614-5F469098-A033-4CC8-B136-B5F7033425DBQ53271434-4A9F2AEB-56FE-4F16-AF69-F812F5EC46ABQ55923797-A39CD885-69D4-43D3-8648-1C2E849E9FB9Q58161501-428F0581-08EC-4F11-B163-D8EF5E2A4253
P2860
Multiple explanation: A consider-an-alternative strategy for debiasing judgments
description
im Januar 1995 veröffentlichter wissenschaftlicher Artikel
@de
wetenschappelijk artikel
@nl
наукова стаття, опублікована в 1995
@uk
name
Multiple explanation: A consider-an-alternative strategy for debiasing judgments
@en
Multiple explanation: A consider-an-alternative strategy for debiasing judgments
@nl
type
label
Multiple explanation: A consider-an-alternative strategy for debiasing judgments
@en
Multiple explanation: A consider-an-alternative strategy for debiasing judgments
@nl
prefLabel
Multiple explanation: A consider-an-alternative strategy for debiasing judgments
@en
Multiple explanation: A consider-an-alternative strategy for debiasing judgments
@nl
P1476
Multiple explanation: A consider-an-alternative strategy for debiasing judgments
@en
P2093
Edward R. Hirt
Keith D. Markman
P304
P356
10.1037/0022-3514.69.6.1069
P577
1995-01-01T00:00:00Z