about
Interventions for treating slipped upper femoral epiphysis (SUFE)The current practice of handling and reporting missing outcome data in eight widely used PROMs in RCT publications: a review of the current literatureUnicompartmental knee arthroplasty: is the glass half full or half empty?Patient-reported outcome measures after total knee arthroplasty: a systematic reviewWhat is the optimal time point to assess patient-reported recovery after hip and knee replacement? A systematic review and analysis of routinely reported outcome data from the English patient-reported outcome measures programmeFunctionality and feedback: a protocol for a realist synthesis of the collation, interpretation and utilisation of PROMs data to improve patient care.Data quality audit of the arthroplasty clinical outcomes registry NSW.Addressing Missing Data in Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMS): Implications for the Use of PROMS for Comparing Provider Performance.Floor and ceiling effects in the OHS: an analysis of the NHS PROMs data set.Making the Oxford Hip and Knee Scores meaningful at the patient level through normative scoring and registry data.The Oxford knee score and its subscales do not exhibit a ceiling or a floor effect in knee arthroplasty patients: an analysis of the National Health Service PROMs data set.Implant Optimisation for Primary Hip Replacement in Patients over 60 Years with Osteoarthritis: A Cohort Study of Clinical Outcomes and Implant Costs Using Data from England and Wales.A randomised controlled trial of total hip arthroplasty versus resurfacing arthroplasty in the treatment of young patients with arthritis of the hip joint.Risk factors for failure of the 36 mm metal-on-metal Pinnacle total hip arthroplasty system: a retrospective single-centre cohort study.Two-stage revision for prosthetic joint infection: predictors of outcome and the role of reimplantation microbiology.Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Spanish version of the Oxford Hip Score in patients with hip osteoarthritis.Thresholds for Oxford Knee Score after total knee replacement surgery: a novel approach to post-operative evaluation.Understanding consumer and clinician preferences and decision making for rehabilitation following arthroplasty in the private sectorEarly mobilisation after total hip or knee arthroplasty: A multicentre prospective observational study.Minimal detectable change for mobility and patient-reported tools in people with osteoarthritis awaiting arthroplasty.Body mass index is not a clinically meaningful predictor of patient reported outcomes of primary hip replacement surgery: prospective cohort study.Rationing of total knee replacement: a cost-effectiveness analysis on a large trial data setJoint replacement registries in the United States: a new paradigm.Determinants of revision and functional outcome following unicompartmental knee replacement.Quality of life following proximal femoral replacement using a modular system in revision THACan pain and function be distinguished in the Oxford Hip Score in a meaningful way? : an exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis.Single periarticular local infiltration analgesia reduces opiate consumption until 48 hours after total knee arthroplasty. A randomized placebo-controlled trial involving 56 patientsMeaningful changes for the Oxford hip and knee scores after joint replacement surgeryImplementation of patient-reported outcome measures in U.S. Total joint replacement registries: rationale, status, and plansValgus subsidence of the tibial component in cementless Oxford unicompartmental knee replacementMeasures of knee function: International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Subjective Knee Evaluation Form, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Physical Function Short Form (KOOS-PS), KDevelopment of an outcome prediction tool for patients considering a total knee replacement--the Knee Outcome Prediction Study (KOPS)Have cementless and resurfacing components improved the medium-term results of hip replacement for patients under 60 years of age?No functional benefit of larger femoral heads and alternative bearings at 6 months following primary hip replacement.Cementless revision TKA with bone grafting of osseous defects restores bone stock with a low revision rate at 4 to 10 years.Gait and lower limb muscle strength in women after triple innominate osteotomyRevision of Metal-on-metal Hip Prostheses Results in Marked Reduction of Blood Cobalt and Chromium Ion Concentrations.Metal backed fixed-bearing unicondylar knee arthroplasties using minimal invasive surgery: a promising outcome analysis of 132 cases.Outcomes of a metal-on-metal total hip replacement systemTotal hip arthroplasty versus resurfacing arthroplasty in the treatment of patients with arthritis of the hip joint: single centre, parallel group, assessor blinded, randomised controlled trial.
P2860
Q24201121-2E4CC05B-C610-4BD1-840D-EDC80A32EC04Q26773044-EE13ABD6-CCB9-400A-8556-9B7292D22F54Q26782749-E1A72128-1CFF-424A-844E-7788DDBF9653Q26798212-F88061CB-3192-4661-893F-050BDE6EA11AQ27008042-FC2984E5-FD30-453E-8451-0BD8017C5EEBQ30837997-D850388B-09FA-4AC7-B851-4D926168B368Q30870644-76A951FC-52CF-48F7-A685-67509037124FQ30903902-1A35333C-A567-462F-861D-8ACF113A64B9Q30983087-B82BB6DA-B56E-45A5-AD32-83CF4C18CAC5Q30989982-BAD63092-D4B9-4CA2-BC51-4761D9057B7AQ31014091-31D13457-1754-4F0F-BB4E-338201358F8FQ31022233-BA3071B5-7B35-4345-B09A-77C086C62A66Q33523874-7A8F2CA3-4788-4917-A068-9A74C9AD0DE0Q33628763-D01C305E-6C2F-4A3F-807D-39989ED3B4F0Q33636212-2BCBAD91-06B5-427B-A3A6-258EF1C7C0E1Q33716969-A5B36211-7C4C-4B9A-8298-A2A43F0E63A6Q33792312-3BC640ED-8CA8-4BE4-8456-1DFA56BCAAE4Q33815148-39290633-7C07-448C-B4D9-481D9F302D6CQ33842275-324E3F5C-1272-4F86-A089-4A786C040BA3Q33927672-C8207CA6-640C-4EFE-8BD8-CDE46508314FQ34102121-003E8BEC-AB17-47C8-B2E2-14914BEDB260Q34145282-AFC5E984-C302-41D8-9088-05F0C43FBBCAQ34159044-A39185D2-F149-420D-B846-591EBA926C70Q34185610-BC3063B5-AD8B-470A-978C-6C39756E0750Q34477051-25C0D95A-C8A3-4EF0-96B4-F3DCAB0112A3Q34545656-49F6A3A5-0A62-487D-A8CB-A6361D53BD01Q34651163-8F1D6FA5-9820-4FAA-817F-42B56CC7761BQ34732413-4F46ABA5-8EB0-4A4A-9E40-FAE1E24C0E44Q34739667-49DE3D0D-96B5-4131-800D-AF28A92EDA74Q34929826-2210FA97-4935-407F-865A-6CD033DF908BQ35107939-2B4F774C-F715-49A5-BDEF-26777114745CQ35191202-1C64B9D4-FA7E-4B97-882E-51A715EDE58EQ35197615-7C6CB790-B2FB-4087-AC35-FEDB930F1AA3Q35197624-32AB3665-D6B1-444B-AF47-64299E417E1AQ35242773-1F0B9396-2F77-4FAD-9F7E-CFFA094E6AF7Q35339489-935E24C7-2362-4E98-83DD-42AAA7503B96Q35689257-DF2BAB5F-A35E-48A7-9895-754805712754Q35728782-F3D84AEF-0BEF-4BF2-8477-D92059691889Q35758348-C9521BEC-CFC4-4AFF-9405-C78722D10079Q35898915-BFD39B16-4C6B-43D0-9908-4A7765C36038
P2860
description
wetenschappelijk artikel
@nl
наукова стаття, опублікована в серпні 2007
@uk
name
The use of the Oxford hip and knee scores
@en
The use of the Oxford hip and knee scores
@en-gb
The use of the Oxford hip and knee scores
@nl
type
label
The use of the Oxford hip and knee scores
@en
The use of the Oxford hip and knee scores
@en-gb
The use of the Oxford hip and knee scores
@nl
prefLabel
The use of the Oxford hip and knee scores
@en
The use of the Oxford hip and knee scores
@en-gb
The use of the Oxford hip and knee scores
@nl
P2093
P1476
The use of the Oxford hip and knee scores
@en
P2093
A. J. Carr
D. J. Beard
D. W. Murray
R. Fitzpatrick
P304
P356
10.1302/0301-620X.89B8.19424
P577
2007-08-01T00:00:00Z