Additional factors for the estimation of mean glandular breast dose using the UK mammography dosimetry protocol.
about
Vision 20/20: Mammographic breast density and its clinical applicationsImproved Diagnostics by Assessing the Micromorphology of Breast Calcifications via X-Ray Dark-Field RadiographyDo women with dense breasts have higher radiation dose during screening mammography?Large area CMOS active pixel sensor x-ray imager for digital breast tomosynthesis: Analysis, modeling, and characterization.Improved visualization of breast cancer features in multifocal carcinoma using phase-contrast and dark-field mammography: an ex vivo study.Non-invasive differentiation of kidney stone types using X-ray dark-field radiographyComputer-based collection of mammographic exposure data for quality assurance and dosimetry.Normalized glandular dose (DgN) coefficients for arbitrary X-ray spectra in mammography: computer-fit values of Monte Carlo derived data.Bi-directional x-ray phase-contrast mammography.Effect of image quality on calcification detection in digital mammographyDual-energy contrast-enhanced breast tomosynthesis: optimization of beam quality for dose and image quality.Breast tomosynthesis with monochromatic beams: a feasibility study using Monte Carlo simulations.Task-based measures of image quality and their relation to radiation dose and patient risk.Comparison of a flexible versus a rigid breast compression paddle: pain experience, projected breast area, radiation dose and technical image quality.Dosimetry and image quality assessment in a direct radiography system.Determination of Tube Output (kVp) and Exposure Mode for Breast Phantom of Various Thicknesses/Glandularity for Digital Mammography.Estimates of Average Glandular Dose with Auto-modes of X-ray Exposures in Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.Exploring silver as a contrast agent for contrast-enhanced dual-energy X-ray breast imaging.Effect of anode/filter combination on average glandular dose in mammography.On image quality metrics and the usefulness of grids in digital mammography.Dose dependence of mass and microcalcification detection in digital mammography: free response human observer studies.Evaluation of low-energy contrast-enhanced spectral mammography images by comparing them to full-field digital mammography using EUREF image quality criteria.A Quantification Method for Breast Tissue Thickness and Iodine Concentration Using Photon-Counting DetectorCharacterization of the homogeneous tissue mixture approximation in breast imaging dosimetry.Investigation of the effect of anode/filter materials on the dose and image quality of a digital mammography system based on an amorphous selenium flat panel detectorDevelopment of an imaging-planning program for screen/film and computed radiography mammography for breasts with short chest wall to nipple distance.X-ray absorptiometry of the breast using mammographic exposure factors: application to units featuring automatic beam quality selection.Clinical dose performance of full field digital mammography in a breast screening programme.Statistical analysis of mammographic breast composition measurements: towards a quantitative measure of relative breast cancer riskBreast cancer detection rates using four different types of mammography detectors.Objective models of compressed breast shapes undergoing mammographyThe relationship between cancer detection in mammography and image quality measurements.Evaluation of mean glandular dose and modulation transfer function for different tube potentials and target-filter combinations in computed radiography mammography.Radiation doses received in the United Kingdom breast screening programme in 2010 to 2012No strong evidence for increased risk of breast cancer 8-26 years after multiple mammograms in their 30s in females at moderate and high familial risk.Quality assurance and quality control in mammography: a review of available guidance worldwide.Overview of patient dosimetry in diagnostic radiology in the USA for the past 50 years.Personalized estimates of radiation dose from dedicated breast CT in a diagnostic population and comparison with diagnostic mammography.The myth of the 50-50 breastDiagnostic reference levels in digital mammography: a systematic review.
P2860
Q28081408-640855F8-B5F2-4335-89A6-881DE7E5048DQ28821496-33DAE3E3-1AA8-48CF-9828-CCF1875EA3C1Q30252190-A4379D2B-7349-4CEA-8253-C0F6FF1ABAACQ30278435-D1ABE514-74BC-4CBF-A638-32381563C2C8Q30399012-9FD9F820-0D8D-4DCE-A3DB-CAF262420FFAQ30640042-D518B0A3-76B2-43EA-9D75-CE3AF6A76F62Q30660356-FBD33695-423C-4D6F-B2F7-7A81566DAEE4Q30694937-04C8C9BF-3692-4185-9268-EE1071D2E837Q33604346-EBF47E1D-F0B6-4236-AAC3-29EB7E1ADFD1Q33941243-17F6108D-9CB8-42F8-94AE-11AAF289ADE9Q34102679-61160ECE-BA95-48EC-BBE2-A3F2503F9423Q34185276-9A6968DD-BD28-41BF-ABE6-4E9D94A09861Q35053235-1C94BAC6-9082-483A-969C-8E2E766CBA21Q35083619-6AEAF968-8307-411F-BCD0-9FA241E071EFQ35124038-ADDED933-A741-424F-B37C-6EAC184D0E45Q35333175-074B6DA5-7B56-464A-A40D-724BB6E9A983Q35670373-AA0F573D-5F9E-4110-8711-A2EB9EE41B3DQ35676703-E441B91A-BD9F-4286-8B0B-9792B9D8985AQ35684960-A616C4C0-85D2-4869-8128-48BAB1C9FEBDQ35774943-F8B2A856-1B7A-4238-9B5C-390B86D319FDQ35843928-D002C3C4-96FF-4B11-BD62-CB2AAB4F2176Q36034384-B17186E0-766E-4E67-94A2-02F68F111EB8Q36062533-30D00FA4-80F8-40E8-8BD5-AB9F202835FAQ36157049-3C2764AA-84C1-4868-B0E8-4D3065F69039Q36323955-856980D6-D598-4D56-ACD8-D2F9321A360AQ36323998-DBC0B57D-4FC3-4D96-981B-AAB22FCCE976Q36324474-FB1C02C1-6547-4111-A42B-EA303351F896Q36324814-DEA8162B-D220-459F-812D-B4F711534DE1Q36325246-53D34AEE-B9BC-4679-B257-D0ABEA47663BQ36404483-6C1D9C9A-3602-4DBF-A8DB-CDA22D2C137DQ36649140-71E134C3-1AD6-4C8E-B6CA-B628BC18CC7CQ36869292-416536F3-816B-47B2-B0E3-F7073BD1C2FBQ37096378-252359B9-8111-4EAA-A4A6-5100DBDE202BQ37175700-84FDAC01-4854-4D6B-A30B-AEA3D654A06FQ37178912-A0F1D319-C2AE-4271-B3D9-D49D2799D8DCQ37192818-7A0BB188-F85F-4EDD-838C-CED92110553FQ37379102-1281D572-3356-457B-BCC8-8A96C94127CAQ37414388-DD40230E-2810-40B4-A77C-195F341BFEB3Q37453193-D288E296-3DDE-4708-9AF1-7BC2A26AD1C8Q38301568-9EC2AF73-3C6F-4CF5-BF38-A0FB9BC2B04C
P2860
Additional factors for the estimation of mean glandular breast dose using the UK mammography dosimetry protocol.
description
2000 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2000年の論文
@ja
2000年学术文章
@wuu
2000年学术文章
@zh
2000年学术文章
@zh-cn
2000年学术文章
@zh-hans
2000年学术文章
@zh-my
2000年学术文章
@zh-sg
2000年學術文章
@yue
2000年學術文章
@zh-hant
name
Additional factors for the est ...... ammography dosimetry protocol.
@en
Additional factors for the est ...... ammography dosimetry protocol.
@nl
type
label
Additional factors for the est ...... ammography dosimetry protocol.
@en
Additional factors for the est ...... ammography dosimetry protocol.
@nl
prefLabel
Additional factors for the est ...... ammography dosimetry protocol.
@en
Additional factors for the est ...... ammography dosimetry protocol.
@nl
P2093
P356
P1476
Additional factors for the est ...... ammography dosimetry protocol.
@en
P2093
P304
P356
10.1088/0031-9155/45/11/308
P577
2000-11-01T00:00:00Z