about
Abstinence-only education and teen pregnancy rates: why we need comprehensive sex education in the U.SCost effectiveness of contraceptives in the United StatesDecreasing Unintended Pregnancy: Opportunities Created by the Affordable Care ActCost-effectiveness analysis of levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) 13.5 mg in contraception.FDA pregnancy risk categories and the CPS: do they help or are they a hindrance?Comparison of contraceptive use between the Contraceptive CHOICE Project and state and national dataExtending contraceptive coverage under the Affordable Care Act saves public funds.The burden of unintended pregnancies in Brazil: a social and public health system cost analysisRace/Ethnicity and pregnancy decision making: the role of fatalism and subjective social standing.Young women's contraceptive microbicide preferences: associations with contraceptive behavior and sexual relationship characteristicsThe relationship between repeated unintended pregnancies and current contraceptive use: National Survey of Family Growth (NSFG) 2006-2008 data.The Contraceptive CHOICE Project: recruiting women at highest risk for unintended pregnancy and sexually transmitted infectionDisparities in safe sex counseling & behavior among individuals with substance dependence: a cross-sectional studyWomen's social communication about IUDs: a qualitative analysis.Association of clinical characteristics and cessation of tobacco, alcohol, and illicit drug use during pregnancy.Return on investment: a fuller assessment of the benefits and cost savings of the US publicly funded family planning programAchieving cost-neutrality with long-acting reversible contraceptive methods.Contraceptive options and their associated estrogenic environmental loads: relationships and trade-offs.Cost of unintended pregnancy in Norway: a role for long-acting reversible contraception.Evaluating Cost-effectiveness of Interventions That Affect Fertility and Childbearing: How Health Effects Are Measured Matters.Racial and ethnic disparities in contraceptive method choice in California.Cost-Effectiveness of Immediate Compared With Delayed Postpartum Etonogestrel Implant InsertionUnintended pregnancy among low income urban married women in India.Effect of the ethinylestradiol/levonorgestrel combined oral contraceptive on the activity of cytochrome P4503A in obese women.Is pregnancy planning associated with background characteristics and pregnancy-planning behavior?Barriers to Postpartum Contraception in Texas and Pregnancy Within 2 Years of Delivery.Burden of unintended pregnancy in the United States: potential savings with increased use of long-acting reversible contraceptionPrior contraceptive use among women who gave birth in the US-Mexico border region, 2005: the Brownsville-Matamoros Sister City Project for Women's HealthAgreement between patient-reported and provider-reported choice of contraceptive method among family planning patients in New York City: implications for public healthIs a previous unplanned pregnancy a risk factor for a subsequent unplanned pregnancy?An ethinyl estradiol-levonorgestrel containing oral contraceptive does not alter cytochrome P4502C9 in vivo activity.Advance provision of emergency contraception for adolescents.The copper intrauterine device for emergency contraception: an opportunity to provide the optimal emergency contraception method and transition to highly effective contraception.Psychometrics of an original measure of barriers to providing family planning information: Implications for social service providers.Changing oral contraceptives from prescription to over-the-counter status: an opinion statement of the Women's Health Practice and Research Network of the American College of Clinical Pharmacy.Racial Differences and the Role of Marital Status in the Association Between Intimate Partner Violence and Unintended Pregnancy.The Cost of Unintended Pregnancies in Canada: Estimating Direct Cost, Role of Imperfect Adherence, and the Potential Impact of Increased Use of Long-Acting Reversible Contraceptives.Direct costs of unintended pregnancy in Spain.Changes in the Use of Contraception at First Intercourse: A Comparison of the National Survey of Family Growth 1995 and 2006-2010 Databases.Pregnancy intentions-a complex construct and call for new measures.
P2860
Q21135219-20712C5F-0F7D-4277-AF70-05999DE69C01Q24631004-CA181C69-D852-4E92-82AA-45C96156F6C4Q26699995-67DCA809-4A98-4CEC-9AB4-4031909193C4Q33605175-616BF9B9-C4F3-4B77-973F-4BFBE86FCBC7Q33724195-9952C97B-1043-412E-8F5C-6EBD98CE5467Q33866614-453E5A15-1CFD-45BC-8D87-805B1F7FDABDQ33915127-ED106330-C383-4951-87D5-3C2E656594F0Q33933835-AEAD0F6B-5489-4E4D-94BE-35E5E902FD64Q34076636-9EE18B58-C8C4-49BE-B827-2956D1519A75Q34281388-BD5E4405-06F8-4F43-913B-DA79D4C787C8Q34362904-D03BCD73-9CF7-46AB-8AD9-BA96C2F45C0FQ34414896-807CD1D8-B37A-42F1-B7AA-C9ECF1F5FF46Q34527916-712821EE-43C5-449B-8E31-41F3C7A2AAD5Q34575610-0B519B41-AA96-48EE-B86A-F806C265A708Q34642151-9D501A83-B31B-4B21-8F5E-B220D1CDABD8Q34700425-0555F0BB-97CF-4A9D-ACAB-B008F241CCFEQ34714453-F9EDD1DE-8CE7-415E-BD53-49190E3B5612Q35132097-BC709030-B10B-4EFF-9F6C-730CD561FB25Q35205464-5ECA19E7-7688-45F5-8EB1-EA982C43903DQ35564876-8894B27E-1A90-4EC4-AF90-6C4785220A33Q35805815-2DF928E2-679C-4946-A820-5DC68533ED96Q35919970-CD5881B3-FB49-4E64-887F-F3B71CC9ACD6Q36006083-D39DCC3F-FB00-4036-AF38-8D4D79D31451Q36336055-F47B7EC6-7770-4D8F-845A-BB27F9F2C26CQ36533109-C718570D-38A9-4B6C-82BA-02CD9B824B70Q36658013-03A641CF-8F98-4EB6-B140-6F4A2B8D9E6FQ36861848-3B6C5EC5-05AC-4FD7-B269-46CDACDB76D8Q36962498-0FC6CB25-E74B-4488-8351-7854A0C6AF99Q37164589-2462CCA6-C03F-4156-AA66-9EBA26BCBCCFQ37309629-97CDBDC1-634C-4263-9359-1B80EB9F3A8FQ37603880-25269EC8-62D4-4E6C-9312-6087A368A4FBQ37778672-536DC515-22DA-413A-9124-5DBFE32E01EBQ38124888-D4281FB5-89DC-4A98-83D4-4350B7D54C9BQ38744301-2351D201-FF27-494E-9B4F-246E0C7F4ED1Q39766133-8460E911-25BE-444A-A4AD-8B3B40E15598Q39949829-FC632A41-326B-4625-A4D1-8E2A43AD7BAFQ40242303-10D97BF9-0506-4CE5-ADC9-ED7559D96D34Q41114332-1C01B9E4-9926-4FE3-B678-F5CDEFD057A5Q42030619-6F2E6638-FD61-43A8-9929-921875A0BE1CQ42869559-F3A5174F-E83E-47B9-9615-D6B984889DF7
P2860
description
2007 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2007年の論文
@ja
2007年学术文章
@wuu
2007年学术文章
@zh-cn
2007年学术文章
@zh-hans
2007年学术文章
@zh-my
2007年学术文章
@zh-sg
2007年學術文章
@yue
2007年學術文章
@zh
2007年學術文章
@zh-hant
name
The cost of unintended pregnancy in the United States.
@en
The cost of unintended pregnancy in the United States.
@nl
type
label
The cost of unintended pregnancy in the United States.
@en
The cost of unintended pregnancy in the United States.
@nl
prefLabel
The cost of unintended pregnancy in the United States.
@en
The cost of unintended pregnancy in the United States.
@nl
P1433
P1476
The cost of unintended pregnancy in the United States.
@en
P2093
James Trussell
P304
P356
10.1016/J.CONTRACEPTION.2006.11.009
P577
2007-01-18T00:00:00Z