about
Long-term trends in the intensity and relative toxicity of herbicide use.Religion and the public ethics of stem-cell research: Attitudes in Europe, Canada and the United States.Hybridizing transgenic Bt cotton with non-Bt cotton counters resistance in pink bollwormSite-saturation mutagenesis library construction and screening for specific broad-spectrum single-domain antibodies against multiple Cry1 toxins.An integrated multi-omics analysis of the NK603 Roundup-tolerant GM maize reveals metabolism disturbances caused by the transformation process.Regulatory requirements for genotoxicity assessment of plant protection product active ingredients, impurities, and metabolites.Next-generation transgenic cotton: pyramiding RNAi and Bt counters insect resistance.Investigating Novice and Expert Conceptions of Genetically Modified Organisms.ALF: a strategy for identification of unauthorized GMOs in complex mixtures by a GW-NGS method and dedicated bioinformatics analysis.A cooperative governance network for crop genome editing: The success of governance networks in other areas could help to find common ground for applying genome editing in agriculture.Bt cotton producing Cry1Ac and Cry2Ab does not harm two parasitoids, Cotesia marginiventris and Copidosoma floridanum.The Economic and Environmental Cost of Delayed GM Crop Adoption: The case of Australia's GM canola moratorium.Impact of genetically engineered maize on agronomic, environmental and toxicological traits: a meta-analysis of 21 years of field data.Toxicological and Biochemical Analyses Demonstrate the Absence of Lethal or Sublethal Effects of cry1C- or cry2A-Expressing Bt Rice on the Collembolan Folsomia candida.Heat and Drought Stresses in Crops and Approaches for Their Mitigation.Essential oil of Siparuna guianensis as an alternative tool for improved lepidopteran control and resistance management practices.Epistasis confers resistance to Bt toxin Cry1Ac in the cotton bollworm.Policy-Led Comparative Environmental Risk Assessment of Genetically Modified Crops: Testing for Increased Risk Rather Than Profiling Phenotypes Leads to Predictable and Transparent Decision-Making.
P2860
Q33571854-3D639CC8-C2A2-44CC-8DD0-0505CD3A8AC8Q33585289-F6098F71-D748-4B43-A610-C88BB687B5FBQ33737861-D63F018A-22D0-47F8-8553-07F0173A92D5Q36397615-79D38C13-5F8C-4835-9DEF-BF1093B443EBQ37518659-562FEC2E-D300-46CA-8220-7F1C86E363EFQ38886272-2CF804CD-281A-471B-A13E-66D47C8A9B33Q41350722-30B65389-7CB3-4DD8-B7EB-5C57CEE7989FQ41559670-A7041A0A-6331-45F7-A0B4-15EC00A9486DQ42621230-90F345C2-FD82-491D-95FC-A9570D2DA720Q44875513-17F6E8E4-ECA4-4AC1-BCA2-8D0D94362FB3Q47555741-74DF84E0-FD2F-4498-A649-345F82808038Q49846991-0640BCD8-F12F-46E1-BB18-20FD605E407CQ49957782-4C59416F-CAD8-4F9E-951C-339D90A188B0Q50300388-B4D6F041-1993-4965-B6F4-C01E15D67DFFQ52362235-AFA05099-3584-48AC-89E4-9A13922E2F0CQ55024833-FF07A626-F171-482E-A18A-112BCFC52CBFQ55284118-8EE8DE77-DD90-4C67-BBA3-2459C9DB9DECQ55400778-67BE4B1A-C00E-4FE0-A575-07744F5B3B9D
P2860
description
wetenschappelijk artikel
@nl
наукова стаття, опублікована в грудні 2016
@uk
name
Genetically Engineered Crops
@en
Genetically Engineered Crops
@nl
type
label
Genetically Engineered Crops
@en
Genetically Engineered Crops
@nl
prefLabel
Genetically Engineered Crops
@en
Genetically Engineered Crops
@nl
P356
P1476
Genetically Engineered Crops
@en
P356
10.17226/23395
P577
2016-12-28T00:00:00Z