about
Your morals depend on languageA theory of medical decision making and health: fuzzy trace theoryAtheists and Agnostics Are More Reflective than Religious Believers: Four Empirical Studies and a Meta-AnalysisComprehension and computation in Bayesian problem solvingUsing visual aids to improve communication of risks about health: a reviewMeasuring Individual Differences in Decision Biases: Methodological Considerations.Gender Differences in Performance Predictions: Evidence from the Cognitive Reflection TestBats, balls, and substitution sensitivity: cognitive misers are no happy foolsIndividual differences in delay discounting: relation to intelligence, working memory, and anterior prefrontal cortexA limitation of the Cognitive Reflection Test: familiarityExamining the Gap between Science and Public Opinion about Genetically Modified Food and Global WarmingRevisiting the Relationship between Individual Differences in Analytic Thinking and Religious Belief: Evidence That Measurement Order Moderates Their Inverse CorrelationAssessing miserly information processing: An expansion of the Cognitive Reflection TestLiberals think more analytically (more "WEIRD") than conservatives.Two Distinct Moral Mechanisms for Ascribing and Denying IntentionalityFinding faults: how moral dilemmas illuminate cognitive structure.Cognitive "Category-Based Induction" Research and Social "Persuasion" Research Are Each About What Makes Arguments Believable: A Tale of Two Literatures.Why Do People Tend to Infer "Ought" From "Is"? The Role of Biases in Explanation.Overcorrection for Social-Categorization Information Moderates Impact Bias in Affective Forecasting.The role of numeracy in moderating the influence of statistics in climate change messages.Prudence, Emotional State, Personality, and Cognitive Ability.Do Resit Exams Promote Lower Investments of Study Time? Theory and Data from a Laboratory Study.Act first, think later: the presence and absence of inferential planning in problem solving.A Puzzle Unsolved: Failure to Observe Different Effects of God and Religion Primes on Intergroup Attitudes.Design of the BRISC study: a multicentre controlled clinical trial to optimize the communication of breast cancer risks in genetic counsellingThe effect of fast and slow decisions on risk takingSex differences in the inference and perception of causal relations within a video game.Cognitive control and individual differences in economic ultimatum decision-making.Reflection does not undermine self-interested prosociality.Are 'counter-intuitive' deontological judgments really counter-intuitive? An empirical reply to.Manipulation detection and preference alterations in a choice blindness paradigm.Cognitive function, numeracy and retirement saving trajectoriesAnalytic thinking promotes religious disbelief.The emotionally intelligent decision maker: emotion-understanding ability reduces the effect of incidental anxiety on risk taking.Risking your life without a second thought: intuitive decision-making and extreme altruismCognitive ability and the demand for redistribution.Non-Reflective Thinkers Are Predisposed to Attribute Supernatural Causation to Uncanny Experiences.Identifying and cultivating superforecasters as a method of improving probabilistic predictions.Variation in the oxytocin receptor gene (OXTR) is associated with differences in moral judgmentDetecting cheaters without thinking: testing the automaticity of the cheater detection module.
P2860
Q21132057-BF817579-409D-4797-9252-613BAC2D3FCBQ24651866-2815DE3F-B647-4A8A-ADA5-AB715835BF84Q26750953-BC95A129-9232-4D64-8C3B-FCB725D95AD1Q26797373-ACD9823B-D929-4C2A-A976-4DE6D0E95E7AQ26829289-0E958EA1-84C7-4E9E-AAFC-290F561ED100Q27305908-3F25F8B2-CE78-4B9A-A120-6A5D53C81264Q28112164-DFE8F8B2-7DC6-4430-ABD9-25F806C8533CQ28285718-9D0F4A0F-ED81-432A-B99E-DBC0166BF551Q28298381-EA3B12F8-2569-4D10-89FF-C95806F1DB22Q28595957-C9F4E398-E6A6-4335-98DE-FF69BF051B18Q28596047-6FD2527E-C61C-4D1F-AC0B-71963978F292Q28607292-E565047A-A7DB-4449-8F81-1F825E09E68AQ29038858-4F111224-6293-46CD-8AE3-1AD6ACACC920Q30301066-C9EE45A0-2CA9-429B-B6AB-708E15BAE52AQ30382152-AF87E856-3B7B-4545-B978-917DF7B231CFQ30407429-2CBA1B9C-DC0D-428D-9E2B-CF0589264105Q30459703-18C0A0CF-AEC2-4224-A506-8E7B58AF17A9Q30489649-0A8472A9-3E7D-4E2C-ABD3-DB1FE954A74DQ30489728-F458355B-DF2B-47A4-B265-5B8F9DA17AA3Q30653325-0C388052-35DF-456A-83E9-FDB816D9CE17Q30826728-D1E65929-8D8F-417E-8439-CC8CCD8CF201Q31135218-A2F6484C-A9AC-459F-989A-6354BF96E1A3Q33355691-2996FA4F-8E8F-45F1-AF03-9A3042A034EBQ33362396-FD63DB21-041F-4FBB-B15E-385D427B21F3Q33373818-FFD10103-39C4-418C-8B7D-8755074F2637Q33841782-0E778250-8AD1-4D7A-82F7-B82B5CB9691AQ34077593-9A0A6503-72B4-41EB-B05D-5B05F932B8EAQ34077744-CDE16014-DA90-4A9D-B403-751C964659FCQ34127062-0AB5BED8-5518-464C-82F3-3694C483252CQ34152345-7A691E09-A863-4F97-A033-736009C227B3Q34233196-B211C65D-0D0A-4B6F-9C6F-0528E9769C1EQ34245680-666291E4-844E-4431-BC8D-A9062A5F6F23Q34271353-11F879C1-DF9A-4218-8AF7-723D30CB4F1FQ34316226-9CB7A6BD-187E-46A5-B820-D0E8603DE7F5Q34343595-F9655BE5-F071-4A48-8178-80BAE0C924F1Q34400493-69EC5B42-7ACE-42D4-8A20-55C061372161Q34475353-5E0FD9E7-1C02-42D4-8B4E-2461B16F09E7Q34476902-355E53DD-35A5-4C29-BA5F-714C4B40C8F4Q34536613-69DB8FEC-E93D-4C70-A529-9D11738476C0Q34558780-ECFCB2DB-CBF0-4F73-9F09-896E53184D6A
P2860
description
article
@en
im November 2005 veröffentlichter wissenschaftlicher Artikel
@de
wetenschappelijk artikel
@nl
наукова стаття, опублікована в листопаді 2005
@uk
ലേഖനം
@ml
name
Cognitive Reflection and Decision Making
@en
Cognitive Reflection and Decision Making
@nl
type
label
Cognitive Reflection and Decision Making
@en
Cognitive Reflection and Decision Making
@nl
prefLabel
Cognitive Reflection and Decision Making
@en
Cognitive Reflection and Decision Making
@nl
P1476
Cognitive Reflection and Decision Making
@en
P2093
Shane Frederick
P356
10.1257/089533005775196732
P577
2005-11-01T00:00:00Z