Difficulties in evaluating public engagement initiatives: reflections on an evaluation of the UK GM Nation? public debate about transgenic crops
about
Representing the public in public engagement: the case of the 2008 UK Stem Cell Dialogue.Assessing participation in a community-based health planning and services programme in Ghana.Health and medical research funding agencies' promotion of public engagement within research: a qualitative interview study exploring the United Kingdom context.Opening up animal research and science-society relations? A thematic analysis of transparency discourses in the United Kingdom.Responsible healthcare innovation: anticipatory governance of nanodiagnostics for theranostics medicine.Assessing the quality of a deliberative democracy mini-public event about advanced biofuel production and development in Canada.Stakeholder engagement in comparative effectiveness research: how will we measure success?Perceived efficacy and attitudes towards genetic science and science governance.Recruiting for representation in public deliberation on the ethics of biobanks.Science to the rescue or contingent progress? Comparing 10 years of public, expert and policy discourses on new and emerging science and technology in the United Kingdom.Calling controversy: assessing synthetic biology's conflict potential.Food, publics, science.Analysis of a normative framework for evaluating public engagement exercises: reliability, validity and limitationsOn evaluating theGM Nation?Public debate about the commercialisation of transgenic crops in Britain
P2860
Q34477153-58238BFA-7B6C-4906-B678-F3EC2DF25700Q34784891-2F36D2F7-F706-401F-858E-F1EEEA02583FQ36725086-C9FB0F6E-06CA-40E0-B313-08D7559F270DQ37282068-4146F80F-45D2-4285-A2F4-71FA5CC6088DQ38068224-70A03456-9EE9-4A8D-B29D-4A168CA6D97DQ38244058-864A7284-EEBC-4365-9DBB-3ECA2B6176BDQ39561185-4BBDC79C-F41D-49A5-B4CD-62A81F8F514BQ39823920-E537B650-F1F4-48E5-AD20-494DDEB980F4Q39865803-6C598459-AB5D-4897-BB31-3DED74CCEA74Q47876672-E7A8A9E5-9E7C-4CE3-9039-226473315BD5Q47989703-4561E847-E03F-4A07-830D-F47B0F00AFEBQ48204046-CC395D5E-55A1-48B5-926E-EEDD473F70E4Q58254048-3D997BF0-F5BB-4CA2-8116-2E31FAF1E0DAQ58254090-0F348D86-C208-4DDE-9BA4-885464930994
P2860
Difficulties in evaluating public engagement initiatives: reflections on an evaluation of the UK GM Nation? public debate about transgenic crops
description
article
@en
im Oktober 2005 veröffentlichter wissenschaftlicher Artikel
@de
wetenschappelijk artikel
@nl
наукова стаття, опублікована в жовтні 2005
@uk
ലേഖനം
@ml
name
Difficulties in evaluating pub ...... debate about transgenic crops
@en
Difficulties in evaluating pub ...... debate about transgenic crops
@nl
type
label
Difficulties in evaluating pub ...... debate about transgenic crops
@en
Difficulties in evaluating pub ...... debate about transgenic crops
@nl
altLabel
Difficulties in evaluating pub ...... debate about transgenic crops
@en
prefLabel
Difficulties in evaluating pub ...... debate about transgenic crops
@en
Difficulties in evaluating pub ...... debate about transgenic crops
@nl
P2093
P2860
P356
P1476
Difficulties in evaluating pub ...... debate about transgenic crops
@en
P2093
John Walls
Nick Pidgeon
Tom Horlick-Jones
P2860
P304
P356
10.1177/0963662505056611
P577
2005-10-01T00:00:00Z