about
Cross-boundary collaboration: key to the conservation puzzleFactoring attitudes towards armed conflict risk into selection of protected areas for conservationPredicting species distributions for conservation decisionsGeographic range size and extinction risk assessment in nomadic species.A new framework for selecting environmental surrogates.Effect of risk aversion on prioritizing conservation projects.A conservation planning approach to mitigate the impacts of leakage from protected area networks.Effects of threat management interactions on conservation priorities.Using empirical models of species colonization under multiple threatening processes to identify complementary threat-mitigation strategies.Effects of past and present livestock grazing on herpetofauna in a landscape-scale experiment.Do temporal changes in vegetation structure additional to time since fire predict changes in bird occurrence?The importance of incorporating functional habitats into conservation planning for highly mobile species in dynamic systems.Quantifying the expected value of uncertain management choices for over-abundant Greylag Geese.The exceptional value of intact forest ecosystems.Surviving with a resident despot: do revegetated patches act as refuges from the effects of the noisy miner (Manorina melanocephala) in a highly fragmented landscape?Two roles for ecological surrogacy: Indicator surrogates and management surrogatesRealising the full potential of citizen science monitoring programsConservation planners tend to ignore improved accuracy of modelled species distributions to focus on multiple threats and ecological processesSpecies co-occurrence analysis predicts management outcomes for multiple threatsBetter planning outcomes requires clear consideration of costs, condition and conservation benefits, and access to the best available data: Reply to Gosper et al., 2016Clear consideration of costs, condition and conservation benefits yields better planning outcomesWise selection of an indicator for monitoring the success of management actions
P50
Q28342460-1C4D8583-17BC-4551-899C-C56810ACCAC3Q28601281-ED550160-1200-4DEE-A211-B87DBDB58A83Q30389858-DA890BEF-1FC6-411D-98CA-FCA69B50A547Q30884124-A7862E2A-44BE-4F66-9D50-0F87BBBFEE8AQ30989206-4F6A210A-965E-404B-88B9-7C04458616D5Q35346096-350556D2-5C0F-4DEA-94A1-38691A70FB44Q35508643-7D61B0F3-7C50-4257-8EF4-0C84ADF90403Q35690419-6A39ED65-3CCD-4197-A4F6-AF6E9BBC28BDQ35880063-05B82BF9-C4E6-479A-9FF0-A39B8DFF595BQ36055230-38A1B9F8-AE3F-411B-9466-E22A6F931820Q36166416-C3B080C7-0931-4EDA-A90E-8CCCF57248C7Q38994163-278D1E03-D02D-489F-8D93-CE3C20C3F3F4Q46248997-9381DCB4-B7E0-43FC-8E4E-44A3410DCAD6Q54266144-0528D0D5-3E8A-476C-B568-DBE0033C880FQ56389009-2C8EB26B-6BE8-4795-B98F-251AE2D3E59AQ56834950-9123440D-F03F-4476-A691-3F962180CC6AQ56985703-F6B6BC09-7DB1-4705-A130-1502B3605A08Q57013739-493B2215-8D32-4F3C-8FD9-4156E6D6BE3BQ60476918-0B906E62-7D5D-48EA-8DE0-C189CCE6D829Q60476922-E7A5EA14-AE32-49E9-9208-FC4AC004D573Q60476937-BA41DFB2-7C86-45A1-88C9-1D2562AE0765Q60476950-B1FE0286-15D1-4B09-BCFA-B5CF8DF6CD44
P50
description
researcher
@en
wetenschapper
@nl
հետազոտող
@hy
name
Ayesha I.T. Tulloch
@ast
Ayesha I.T. Tulloch
@en
Ayesha I.T. Tulloch
@es
Ayesha I.T. Tulloch
@nl
Ayesha I.T. Tulloch
@sl
type
label
Ayesha I.T. Tulloch
@ast
Ayesha I.T. Tulloch
@en
Ayesha I.T. Tulloch
@es
Ayesha I.T. Tulloch
@nl
Ayesha I.T. Tulloch
@sl
prefLabel
Ayesha I.T. Tulloch
@ast
Ayesha I.T. Tulloch
@en
Ayesha I.T. Tulloch
@es
Ayesha I.T. Tulloch
@nl
Ayesha I.T. Tulloch
@sl
P108
P106
P31
P496
0000-0002-5866-1923