about
Mathematically gifted adolescents have deficiencies in social valuation and mentalizationGame Theory Paradigm: A New Tool for Investigating Social Dysfunction in Major Depressive DisordersThe Responders' Gender Stereotypes Modulate the Strategic Decision-Making of Proposers Playing the Ultimatum GameTestosterone Administration Related Differences in Brain Activation during the Ultimatum GameEmpathy promotes altruistic behavior in economic interactionsSomeone has to give in: theta oscillations correlate with adaptive behavior in social bargainingBiased forecasting of postdecisional affectThe sunny side of fairness: preference for fairness activates reward circuitry (and disregarding unfairness activates self-control circuitry)Resisting the power of temptations: the right prefrontal cortex and self-controlLimbic justice--amygdala involvement in immediate rejection in the Ultimatum GameA putative human pheromone, androstadienone, increases cooperation between menBuilding the Leviathan--Voluntary centralisation of punishment power sustains cooperation in humansEvolution of responses to (un)fairnessMeasuring the Closeness of Relationships: A Comprehensive Evaluation of the 'Inclusion of the Other in the Self' ScaleA Behavioral Approach to the Rational Choice Theory of Collective Action: Presidential Address, American Political Science Association, 1997Music-induced Mood Biases Decision Strategies during the Ultimatum Game.Testosterone, cortisol, and serotonin as key regulators of social aggression: A review and theoretical perspectiveMaximization, learning, and economic behaviorHuman Cooperation and Its Underlying Mechanisms.Gene-culture interaction and the evolution of the human sense of fairnessMoney talks: neural substrate of modulation of fairness by monetary incentives.Theory of mind deficits partly mediate impaired social decision-making in schizophrenia.The Influence of Counterfactual Comparison on Fairness in Gain-Loss Contexts.Strategic Motives Drive Proposers to Offer Fairly in Ultimatum Games: An fMRI StudyEvolution of fairness in the not quite ultimatum game.Embodied economics: how bodily information shapes the social coordination dynamics of decision-makingA neural signature of the creation of social evaluation.The roles of dopamine and serotonin in decision making: evidence from pharmacological experiments in humansBiosensor approach to psychopathology classification.Proposers' Economic Status Affects Behavioral and Neural Responses to UnfairnessDopamine D4 receptor gene associated with fairness preference in ultimatum gameFair Topologies: Community Structures and Network Hubs Drive Emergence of Fairness Norms."I'm worth more than that": trait positivity predicts increased rejection of unfair financial offers.Cooperative Behavior in the Ultimatum Game and Prisoner's Dilemma Depends on Players' ContributionsEmotion expression in human punishment behavior.Climate change and game theory.Broadening behavioral decision research: multiple levels of cognitive processing.Extending color psychology to the personality realm: interpersonal hostility varies by red preferences and perceptual biasesHello handsome! Male's facial attractiveness gives rise to female's fairness bias in Ultimatum Game scenarios-An ERP study.Preschoolers are sensitive to free riding in a public goods game.
P2860
Q21135721-D3AFB096-AA6C-4215-ACA0-E672715DA4E4Q26781523-EBE3B529-A5D2-4142-820E-BAAB98126DAEQ27305260-60E70CE6-93CA-41B3-BF3C-254F8E43235FQ27313193-C95CBCB2-0067-4934-8EBF-98713E18A257Q27315816-5DA2561E-51C8-4994-952B-4FFF49F92B9EQ27321365-4C45BDD4-5541-4046-8236-31C4B720F054Q28239627-775B1A2A-37BF-44BA-B6C6-2524D8593964Q28275757-16D910F0-EB65-4E8C-B239-74E08663BE63Q28291922-37B379E4-816B-47EA-90B1-4697681DCBA3Q28478025-E469E71B-1BD7-46E8-9D56-C9E3A2AE0A0BQ28533267-60852073-3BD6-432A-AB61-3F7FFA7992B7Q28604143-4B0F86AF-BAE0-45C2-9C3D-B5D602469943Q28646275-C2D17DFC-9080-45FE-AEE0-9DB82B2E198FQ28648465-D3308EB8-E136-4E4C-A8D8-F0267758A9ADQ29041919-41ADAE1C-5D55-4926-9147-3DA1808815D1Q30386731-3F69CC45-0BB6-47E7-8927-F0508C70BF6DQ30469388-8F852591-08BA-45A6-903E-2D3D258C6BBBQ30585133-89CD48E6-D545-4052-AA66-9D1AF02EE925Q31111293-B12BC789-0F50-4C71-8154-3D80B4C2B907Q33363786-E581EC04-AC4E-48D4-AEC9-052C96EF3478Q33595285-C3B87841-8701-4F76-A6AE-B6AB9F8521C6Q33644939-C4EC368B-074A-41A0-B79C-881D50042594Q33650406-D44E2B8B-AE5C-40F7-A436-E78C830FBBC0Q33674351-5D4CD9BF-559D-4CA1-83CC-F16DAEBE80BEQ33682333-2C99CF6D-0977-445A-A958-C5FE296BE0E7Q33683388-773C8B21-9822-4989-8C2A-96DDDD5BB13AQ33692256-C4F68F37-1DEF-4DE6-A663-3A24E3642740Q33706269-54BEDB03-765A-486E-AA66-A01936D0564EQ33727965-B05B2F2C-5D03-41FA-A879-6790DB830F00Q33734611-5A225DBB-8EB0-4766-BF94-DA791B5C66C6Q33745016-7EAD65E3-FFA0-4166-A346-E77AD5A0E2D8Q33758902-45DA5C7E-80D3-444E-BC17-4481E0E422DCQ33775622-3837D501-0E6B-4FF9-825E-DA156C9C0A9BQ33804458-D8729214-3CBE-4A59-BD0F-AD38781F7AC1Q33821652-7E45397C-CF16-4415-9687-A5CD88CF869AQ33823967-9DE6712B-6E1A-4656-B9B8-D0F214E1C2E2Q33842550-1D235D27-6862-4794-9DF8-A0493215D825Q33856985-5285A360-942F-4DAA-B663-73364FFCA976Q33874072-04735FD5-58E7-45E2-84C6-873056974960Q33901760-E825BA07-45D1-44D1-AEC6-8BE044D83C1D
P2860
description
article
@en
im Dezember 1982 veröffentlichter wissenschaftlicher Artikel
@de
wetenschappelijk artikel
@nl
наукова стаття, опублікована в грудні 1982
@uk
ലേഖനം
@ml
name
An experimental analysis of ultimatum bargaining
@en
An experimental analysis of ultimatum bargaining
@nl
type
label
An experimental analysis of ultimatum bargaining
@en
An experimental analysis of ultimatum bargaining
@nl
prefLabel
An experimental analysis of ultimatum bargaining
@en
An experimental analysis of ultimatum bargaining
@nl
P2093
P1476
An experimental analysis of ultimatum bargaining
@en
P2093
Bernd Schwarze
Rolf Schmittberger
Werner Güth
P304
P356
10.1016/0167-2681(82)90011-7
P577
1982-12-01T00:00:00Z