about
Measuring the Closeness of Relationships: A Comprehensive Evaluation of the 'Inclusion of the Other in the Self' ScaleChapter 6 Keynesian Theory and the AD–AS Framework: A ReconsiderationExcess reciprocity distorts reputation in online social networks.Exposure to Hedione Increases Reciprocity in Humans.Using online social media for recruitment of human immunodeficiency virus-positive participants: a cross-sectional survey.Climate change and game theory.Trust and reciprocity: are effort and money equivalent?The social structure of cooperation and punishment.Rethinking natural altruism: simple reciprocal interactions trigger children's benevolenceGratefully received, gratefully repaid: the role of perceived fairness in cooperative interactions.Monte Carlo Planning Method Estimates Planning Horizons during Interactive Social ExchangeA conceptual review of decision making in social dilemmas: applying a logic of appropriateness.It Depends Who Is Watching You: 3-D Agent Cues Increase FairnessTend to Compare and Tend to Be Fair: The Relationship between Social Comparison Sensitivity and Justice Sensitivity.Group Membership Modulates the Neural Circuitry Underlying Third Party Punishment.Is costly punishment altruistic? Exploring rejection of unfair offers in the Ultimatum Game in real-world altruists.The impact of anxiety on social decision-making: behavioral and electrodermal findings.Prosocial Personality Traits Differentially Predict Egalitarianism, Generosity, and Reciprocity in Economic Games.Reputation Management in Children on the Autism Spectrum.Environmental protection, inequality, and institutional change.Public goods games with reward in finite populations.Editorial: Trust: The Limits of Human Moral.Social and strategic imitation: the way to consensus.Technical application for inspection sampling for repairable systems in an economic system.Fairness requires deliberation: the primacy of economic over social considerations.The relationship between education and levels of trust and tolerance in Europe.Belief in reciprocity in a Chinese sample.Neural signatures of trust in reciprocity: A coordinate-based meta-analysis.TV programs that denounce unfair advantage impact women's sensitivity to defection in the public goods game.A cross-cultural study of noblesse oblige in economic decision-making.Fair Is Not Fair Everywhere.Pro-community altruism and social status in a Shuar village.Scientific disintegrity as a public bad.Can classic moral stories promote honesty in children?Dishonesty in the name of equity.Bad drives psychological reactions, but good propels behavior: responses to honesty and deception.Homo reciprocans.Reciprocity and uncertainty.Immaterial and monetary gifts in economic transactions: evidence from the field.Emergence of social networks via direct and indirect reciprocity
P2860
Q28648465-BD4CD166-47E6-47DC-BCEE-596AF6F453BEQ30048056-1F240613-29AD-4827-A51D-92897ACCFD44Q30855759-AF8FA5A1-2A64-4CDE-B920-8C723F4FBDE6Q33621922-4C395C59-F4F1-47DE-9702-41EE11DE6E02Q33633364-8A27F50E-D25B-4213-AEAD-0D2E07340ECDQ33823967-5D3A3221-77F3-43E4-B6D4-E9F63A8A51F5Q33833917-873AFCEE-BFEA-4E81-B71D-7A6EA248C2CAQ34250657-E4E38DB4-2C81-4AB3-B344-4852585805D1Q34661222-69D00ECC-CBEA-4E3E-8BAB-056DAEE3E5ACQ35499449-808C59EF-0224-423A-A68A-F1F362C8E69EQ35656570-6DD7104E-DCA3-40F2-BB2F-8BF442D3EAE0Q35904152-698D89CA-C9E3-43E7-86D6-C59E8BA30C0EQ35918237-19ADBE2C-03BE-438F-B428-26CA65B5CC6BQ36026765-B90B45DD-4264-4001-93A6-AA3206D62940Q36189906-8E93861C-1263-46EA-A4A5-26AB71648228Q36438654-195CFFE0-1EB5-43E5-9B9D-966D5CBC6532Q36785230-2071B6F2-BD59-4E45-BB6C-FBD306BC401EQ37159336-177D0F2F-91BA-4DFE-B91F-7960C7642159Q37416229-E3A12FB9-7B5E-4881-B721-FF78D469D665Q37844608-BA048D0A-4C09-4E63-9716-40D0D505E4D3Q38430225-DC9C60EF-AC3E-46D8-8EB4-A4A0DDA5F413Q42322567-A3B50245-3A3F-42AE-BC91-20FF901179CBQ42326804-7E27C548-06B6-438F-B35F-B50D0D2E015EQ42370309-A3187C08-B879-419C-8DFF-5DE277998845Q42592982-B4D0973A-2316-4A6B-88E7-307238FC6181Q43703894-133D3AD3-EBFD-425C-B95F-BD80C20A7E74Q43936620-5B3EBD89-531A-4DB5-BC14-78D77C1484AFQ45047341-3034E2B1-0D68-433A-8FC6-88FB42035385Q45815109-81D6E6A6-E66F-48F5-BA6F-37EC7685A305Q46040687-AAE91884-5A9D-4139-90B2-01C2280723D2Q46708997-5EB44F04-28BF-4DB5-B057-C13F0FA57AEFQ47392498-149091D0-A878-4792-B71E-2928831CD994Q47650795-D9F0B4A4-3C1E-40EB-B599-F0A2EB330406Q48073281-49860CE8-75D9-472E-ADD0-416EFCF530A6Q48263057-55F5B3A3-48A1-456D-AAED-ED028C1E37AAQ48277901-98C1B1C3-5FA9-4E21-8F3F-59FBC553A4A1Q48651042-6661DC95-C324-486E-87EC-1538F5554622Q48684811-63155B8A-A438-4D85-804D-5F7A207D88BFQ49957282-ABF7B9AE-103A-40A8-8A79-3266B57C939CQ56067077-5E0F0871-E419-450F-AD00-771ED407ABD8
P2860
description
im August 2000 veröffentlichter wissenschaftlicher Artikel
@de
wetenschappelijk artikel
@nl
наукова стаття, опублікована в серпні 2000
@uk
name
Fairness and Retaliation: The Economics of Reciprocity
@en
Fairness and Retaliation: The Economics of Reciprocity
@nl
type
label
Fairness and Retaliation: The Economics of Reciprocity
@en
Fairness and Retaliation: The Economics of Reciprocity
@nl
prefLabel
Fairness and Retaliation: The Economics of Reciprocity
@en
Fairness and Retaliation: The Economics of Reciprocity
@nl
P356
P1476
Fairness and Retaliation: The Economics of Reciprocity
@en
P304
P356
10.1257/JEP.14.3.159
P577
2000-08-01T00:00:00Z