about
Addressing ethical issues in H3Africa research – the views of research ethics committee membersApplying research ethics guidelines: the view from a sub-saharan research ethics committee.How Much Participant Outcome Data Is Missing from Sight: Findings from a Cohort of Trials Submitted to a German Research Ethics Committee.Responses of local research ethics committees to a study with approval from a multicentre research ethics committeeRole of the research ethics committee.Ethical Conduct in Research Involving Human Beings In Brazil: Diagnosis of Research Ethics Committee.Ethical aspects in tissue research: thematic analysis of ethical statements to the research ethics committeeResearch ethics committee audit: differences between committees.What a national research ethics committee does.A national research ethics committee?Informing potential participants of local research ethics committee approval of research protocols.Reflections on running training workshops for research ethics committee members in Spain between 2001 and 2008Research ethics committee: getting started.Analysis of Animal Research Ethics Committee Membership at American InstitutionsObservations from six years' experience of a health and safety research ethics committee.The Challenge of Timely, Responsive and Rigorous Ethics Review of Disaster Research: Views of Research Ethics Committee Members.Premature Discontinuation of Prospective Clinical Studies Approved by a Research Ethics Committee - A Comparison of Randomised and Non-Randomised StudiesWhat is the role of the research ethics committee? Paternalism, inducements, and harm in research ethics.Review by a local medical research ethics committee of the conduct of approved research projects, by examination of patients' case notes, consent forms, and research records and by interviewHIV/AIDS research conducted in the developing world and sponsored by the developed world: reporting of research ethics committee review in two countries.The practical logic of reasonableness: an ethnographic reconnaissance of a research ethics committee.Pharmaceutical trials in general practice: the first 100 protocols. An audit by the clinical research ethics committee of the Royal College of General Practitioners.Reasons for resubmission of research projects to the research ethics committee of a university hospital in São Paulo, Brazil.What scientists want from their research ethics committee.Training needs assessment in research ethics evaluation among research ethics committee members in three African countries: Cameroon, Mali and Tanzania.Varying ethics rules in clinical research and routine patient care--research ethics committee chairpersons' views in Finland.Upper age limits in studies submitted to a research ethics committee.The research ethics committee is not the enemy: oversight of community-based participatory research.Ethical review from the inside: repertoires of evaluation in Research Ethics Committee meetings.Ethical review of research protocols: experience of a research ethics committee.Research ethics committee auditing: the experience of a university hospital.Review of the Medical Research Ethics Committee (MREC), National Research Center of Egypt, 2003-2011.Recurring themes arising during medical research ethics committee review.The reporting of research ethics committee approval and informed consent in otolaryngology journals.Using the Emanuel et al. framework to assess ethical issues raised by a biomedical research ethics committee in South Africa.Ethical issues of informed consent in malaria research proposals submitted to a research ethics committee in Thailand: a retrospective document review.Evaluation in health promotion: thoughts from inside a human research ethics committee.Unjustified exclusion of elderly people from studies submitted to research ethics committee for approval: descriptive study.Silent Voices: Current and Future Roles of African Research Ethics Committee Administrators.Research ethics committee decision-making in relation to an efficient neonatal trial.
P921
Q28603884-ED6B957B-6AA2-4628-B6B5-E9B1B051F325Q30431359-D0B3D19B-A6EB-456B-AA5A-F610256E487FQ31108775-7B0D6D65-31C1-4AF5-B037-94FDB4C5D99CQ33900679-F906DB0F-6548-4EA7-BD2E-885C54E70E43Q33917392-8ED64EDD-9F41-41F8-89EA-29C2C60677A2Q34235549-6FCD72E9-9195-4AF0-91CD-EA077E14D7F4Q34371282-6FF44B42-0C54-45B9-924F-0B38D1A3D8A3Q34384603-4C75AC19-EE09-42D3-BA20-0E56AAA36205Q34410736-80151763-64AB-4FA7-8366-6252F68FEBEDQ34411588-632C1979-91BF-4E26-A963-97554CE7F970Q34412443-6D2C6B55-7E95-4715-94FA-0EEE87AC938FQ34449684-D5BA1B74-1B46-4544-8DE9-8C0AB221F0AAQ34479381-FBAA79A3-956A-4F24-B940-1A126370AC59Q34498775-8298F449-8E2A-4A9D-A9E9-12192F967DB2Q35975863-E20F2167-B2F2-43F7-9C03-45350A180FAAQ36057682-F498007C-E24F-477F-9B4E-5DC8CE9659BEQ36177178-AB381B4C-274F-49BC-A86A-55A9C6816C64Q36182486-CFAECA0B-D0E1-40FE-852D-46A080AFB990Q36244734-4B72FE49-237A-4BF2-B4D4-696AEAE619CEQ36282584-93A40532-DC5C-49F7-8C7F-2C4295C32362Q36387523-A64D837B-8B20-4849-8003-0DD4F4573AE4Q36601112-AFD70C25-A110-40B3-B425-0743F915A45EQ37349535-3B17CC78-BFB1-484A-ACBE-9284F39D9F13Q37455104-3170362B-9A8C-49BC-87A1-5CE0F505B453Q37632495-BCE43FBD-426E-486C-944C-04B85D6D9FE3Q37704353-486BCCCE-CB46-4A4B-A03F-8570C54CFC4BQ37741726-317F5964-CFC1-4A3A-B4BB-58C508A382E1Q37816430-5AB8D250-BC23-43AE-BA13-8EC2F4DE864EQ37983910-5D7B2244-85D7-40FD-9B09-31198A72F436Q37998616-636BF23E-86BB-4968-BFBA-A85188AD7712Q38084172-F7C6A406-A51C-4E78-AF00-E4DC22CD3053Q38115340-D0B1EC67-CF37-4073-9D58-41530A17E826Q38126048-DEC61BDA-76BA-45BA-A421-53E512E1A0FDQ38259753-2296A87A-4CD7-4A70-A668-32D2FDE25511Q38369551-047C4BDA-66F8-44A4-AAA7-DD6D0F0E8FA0Q38625490-41850FEC-FF66-4516-A9C7-8A1E93900132Q38625640-29167077-0820-4A05-BEC2-AE99D7F98991Q38631519-62290A6F-5B3A-4153-A98A-37EE634DA23AQ38768733-55D094D5-814D-42CD-82EF-14CD03B4E4BDQ39388503-3C0F963E-7A76-49F0-9620-CEDA67FDB7C5
P921
description
group of people assessing research for compliance with ethical norms
@en
name
research ethics committee
@en
type
label
research ethics committee
@en
prefLabel
research ethics committee
@en