about
The ethics of interrogation and the American Psychological Association: a critique of policy and processImpact of shared scientific or ethical review of multicentre clinical research on the quality of clinical research and the clinical research processImpact of shared scientific or ethical review of multicentre clinical research on the quality of clinical research and the clinical research processDevelopment of ethical rules for boundaries of touch in complementary medicine--outcomes of a Delphi process.Emotions and the process of ethical decision-making.[CARDIOLOGY, ETHICS AND AUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSING. OPENING SPEECH BY THE PRESIDENT OF THE 4TH EUROPEAN CARDIOLOGICAL CONGRESS IN PRAGUE ON 16TH AUGUST 1964.][Ethical and deontological problems in the use of electronic data processing in nursing]Legal and ethical considerations in processing patient-identifiable data without patient consent: lessons learnt from developing a disease register.Ethics in health care, Part I: The process of ethics committees.Due process in ethics committee case review.Identifying structures, processes, resources and needs of research ethics committees in Egypt.The role of ethics committees and ethics consultation in allocation decisions: a 4-stage processA mixed-methods study on perceptions towards use of Rapid Ethical Assessment to improve informed consent processes for health research in a low-income settingChallenging Operations: An Ethical Framework to Assist Humanitarian Aid Workers in their Decision-making Processes.Ethical considerations in international HIV vaccine trials: summary of a consultative process conducted by the Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS).Ethics and nursing research. 2: Examination of the research process.Ethics committees and due process.Procedure versus process: ethical paradigms and the conduct of qualitative research.The impact of the introduction of the ethical review process for research using animals in the UK: attitudes to alternatives among those working With experimental animals.The impact of the introduction of the ethical review process for research using animals in the UK: implementation of policy.Judging the ethics of qualitative research: considering the "ethics as process" model.Ethical perspectives on pharmacogenomic profiling in the drug development process.Development process and initial validation of the Ethical Conflict in Nursing Questionnaire-Critical Care VersionEthical issues in research involving minority populations: the process and outcomes of protocol review by the Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Thailand.Editorial policy in reporting ethical processes: A survey of 'instructions for authors' in International Indexed Dental Journals.Multicentre trials review process by research ethics committees in Spain: where do they stand before implementing the new European regulation?Ethics of research involving humans: uniform processes for disparate categories?Ethics board review of biomedical processes: improving the process.Fostering ethical competency: an ongoing staff development process that encourages professional growth and staff satisfaction.Ethics: a process of reflection.Critical Analysis of Assessment Studies of the Animal Ethics Review Process.An appraisal of the process of protocol review by an ethics review conmmittee in a tertiary institution in IbadanApplying Cases to Solve Ethical Problems: The Significance of Positive and Process-Oriented Reflection.Professionalism in the match process: the rules and ethics of recruitment.Process and context--ethics review of research impacting aboriginal and indigenous peoples: establishing the historical context. Introduction to the Proceedings of a Workshop of the Consent Committee, November 19-21, 1999 held in Ottawa, Canada.Improving Australia's ethical review processes--slow and steady wins the race.Youth researching youth: benefits, limitations and ethical considerations within a participatory research processRecruitment and communication process for participation in the 2005 AEM Consensus Conference on the Ethical Conduct of Resuscitation Research: methodology, challenges, lessons learned.When reviews attack: ethics, free speech, and the peer review process.Is it time to standardize ethics guiding the peer review process?
P921
Q21203532-3E903033-C20F-4FE0-AE6B-28C778CC0D12Q24246144-8938164B-CC9E-4D4E-8F96-24E49DB8DBC5Q24250147-577DAFFC-7C25-4B91-AC55-3CC076F36395Q30394510-465FFE52-3EFD-4DF5-BF7E-95AB142357CCQ30455803-11DBB32A-0C82-4078-B560-EC82D58E0C76Q30870673-95403431-EDBF-40D4-B027-A0D5A0F1554EQ31023486-8D3B7278-22D5-4631-ACCC-B47A06AEEB96Q31110987-194E2DE0-7A49-48FD-BCDA-CA950F8C2BB0Q33550384-7222C543-8214-47F3-9C09-9D599B3C15A3Q33550420-7C0D71DB-577B-41E9-913A-0FABB75C742EQ33618576-136B978C-FC9E-4DCC-960F-8AAADAF10352Q33655955-17ECF4DB-8815-46F3-B519-2017F66EE1BBQ33747212-6DADC4F7-464E-4ADA-86EA-3032CE575B92Q33816165-5F0DF87B-3EDC-48B8-9D29-C8846680A06BQ33853592-36CA85AB-F964-4742-A654-94D55EA31E3EQ33859005-1C0DC86E-60CD-486E-83E1-C3C3E232678BQ34410698-52DF93FF-0750-4320-8E68-BFE44F89EE87Q34422884-ED892C90-70FC-4349-BC1C-1F885C68AC9AQ34439450-DBCD6D36-29AB-48CA-817F-D98AD5340211Q34521415-B250DC49-D350-43AA-9E23-D81109FC5902Q34532560-4B2228D0-91D8-4059-BDC6-BDD1F6E2E5CBQ34743306-EA907106-F808-4FDD-85AB-E801B4477ACAQ34750877-718AFB73-110B-457E-B5E0-DDD7731FCF81Q34985255-4CC429F3-A8CD-4E34-A9B1-3FF001F68277Q35234107-FC3237C5-0C3A-4D7C-83C6-2BED618D53D8Q35429903-906FCB95-75B5-4E17-916E-8AD61233EB3AQ35610281-A0159C2B-B48A-4883-96F2-32A53E9A2363Q35650146-2BB2F86D-ADA4-413B-B326-BA582B62CC7FQ35660691-B52F044B-D2C3-42B2-840E-0FF36802D717Q35742186-599D9A72-4C44-49E5-8429-5DB8C209CB7FQ35827296-9A929B48-B9D2-48F9-8D8A-C2CE5EDCE439Q35905845-BF1D62D5-00B0-4B66-8FB7-7753C57FCFA1Q35924392-913BE221-3ED8-441B-B5D3-96A778768834Q35926150-399D5090-0B7A-4060-A1BE-47115146F1E8Q35946971-FEA91E75-61A3-430F-B5B6-C87B9D759B00Q36089221-D0C9504B-53E2-4616-A9EC-3C6574CD58FFQ36159298-943B3B8D-F8FB-42E9-B77B-10A3AE57CC48Q36303577-3220DB08-436A-409A-A510-5E0C977BF8C1Q36379096-CFB93712-9AF9-4D84-9034-637BDE7A6E86Q36471213-519DEA63-A241-4F6E-915A-2E4E850A28A7
P921
description
set of steps involved in ethical review
@en
name
ethical review process
@en
type
label
ethical review process
@en
altLabel
ethics process
@en
prefLabel
ethical review process
@en