Evaluation of radiation scheme performance within chemistry climate models
about
sameAs
The mystery of recent stratospheric temperature trends.Radiative flux and forcing parameterization error in aerosol-free clear skies.Radiative forcing of carbon dioxide, methane, and nitrous oxide: A significant revision of the methane radiative forcingRecommendations for diagnosing effective radiative forcing from climate models for CMIP6Climate impact of stratospheric ozone recoveryImpact of uncertainties in atmospheric mixing on simulated UTLS composition and related radiative effectsEvaluating adjusted forcing and model spread for historical and future scenarios in the CMIP5 generation of climate modelsThe potential impact of changes in lower stratospheric water vapour on stratospheric temperatures over the past 30 yearsGlobal warming potentials and radiative efficiencies of halocarbons and related compounds: A comprehensive reviewStratospheric water vapor and climate: Sensitivity to the representation in radiation codesStratospheric temperature trends: our evolving understandingSensitivity of the tropical stratospheric ozone response to the solar rotational cycle in observations and chemistry–climate model simulationsOn the lack of stratospheric dynamical variability in low-top versions of the CMIP5 modelsEnergetic Particle Influence on the Earth’s AtmosphereEvaluation of simulated photolysis rates and their response to solar irradiance variabilityAdvancements in decadal climate predictability: The role of nonoceanic driversTroposphere-Stratosphere Temperature Trends Derived From Satellite Data Compared With Ensemble Simulations From WACCM
P2860
Q30578836-B8DC97E4-F6EE-425A-B98B-3D092239B465Q36592887-8E3AA19A-E7D4-4225-A7BA-16AE24854DD2Q56286585-1406882A-F3A0-43B6-9494-BF050F218A07Q56286588-50CCCEAC-B611-4DF6-9AEC-C02AAF88A2A0Q56836088-6B57A327-4FA2-4F10-86EA-9CB74626C4C0Q56836104-256FF552-35CA-49BD-8D3F-BBBB42931DC4Q56837436-993E99F4-3872-41CA-8622-EF5BCEF954F4Q57402962-2E5C9C57-0E4C-4ABA-BC9E-C0254C877F9FQ57402965-92129BCC-EBEF-4D8A-9089-B6F6F989C9A9Q57402978-2278D7B9-7D08-4C83-A861-A213037C10C2Q57402984-F05AF0C2-2B1C-460F-8645-1275D6178B6FQ57882105-91172711-95E9-4574-98C7-1E0B69119171Q57916744-A82845E4-50CE-40ED-ADF7-89E2870B1DDBQ58054985-C3067617-84A6-49E8-93F2-34C3E0E5BCCCQ58060557-2407CBE6-C944-4B36-9F8E-54F6B0AD7E1FQ58079415-CC1A770A-AB90-430F-BF26-CCFE6AF11D04Q58266452-AE333276-4434-435D-993D-DA87414843CE
P2860
Evaluation of radiation scheme performance within chemistry climate models
description
article
@en
im Mai 2011 veröffentlichter wissenschaftlicher Artikel
@de
wetenschappelijk artikel
@nl
наукова стаття, опублікована в травні 2011
@uk
name
Evaluation of radiation scheme performance within chemistry climate models
@en
Evaluation of radiation scheme performance within chemistry climate models
@nl
type
label
Evaluation of radiation scheme performance within chemistry climate models
@en
Evaluation of radiation scheme performance within chemistry climate models
@nl
prefLabel
Evaluation of radiation scheme performance within chemistry climate models
@en
Evaluation of radiation scheme performance within chemistry climate models
@nl
P2093
P2860
P50
P356
P1154
2-s2.0-79961236229
P1476
Evaluation of radiation scheme performance within chemistry climate models
@en
P2093
Alexey Karpechko
Boris Fomin
Eli Mlawer
Hideharu Akiyoshi
Jiangnan Li
Kiyotaka Shibata
Michael J. Iacono
Nathan Gillett
Perrine Lemennais
Robert W. Portmann
P2860
P356
10.1029/2010JD015361
P407
P50
P577
2011-05-18T00:00:00Z