Numeracy, ratio bias, and denominator neglect in judgments of risk and probability
about
Assessment of cognitive biases and biostatistics knowledge of medical residents: a multicenter, cross-sectional questionnaire studyA theory of medical decision making and health: fuzzy trace theoryComprehension and computation in Bayesian problem solvingUsing visual aids to improve communication of risks about health: a reviewAssessing patient preferences for treatment options and process of care in inflammatory bowel disease: a critical review of quantitative dataVisualizing uncertainty about the futureMore Is Not Always Better: Intuitions About Effective Public Policy Can Lead to Unintended ConsequencesA signal detection analysis of gist-based discrimination of genetic breast cancer riskDevelopmental reversals in risky decision making: intelligence agents show larger decision biases than college studentsCommunicating Numerical Risk: Human Factors That Aid Understanding in Health Care.Communicating genetic and genomic information: health literacy and numeracy considerationsRethinking Hardy-Weinberg and genetic drift in undergraduate biology.Efficacy of a web-based intelligent tutoring system for communicating genetic risk of breast cancer: a fuzzy-trace theory approach.Fuzzy universality of probability judgment.Probabilistic cognition in two indigenous Mayan groupsGerms are germs, and why not take a risk? Patients' expectations for prescribing antibiotics in an inner-city emergency department.Six of one, half dozen of the other: expanding and contracting numerical dimensions produces preference reversals.Development of Risky Decision Making: Fuzzy-Trace Theory and Neurobiological Perspectives.Being Sticker Rich: Numerical Context Influences Children's Sharing Behavior.Visual aids improve diagnostic inferences and metacognitive judgment calibration.Shared Medical Decision Making in Lung Cancer Screening: Experienced versus Descriptive Risk Formats.Individual Differences in Numeracy and Cognitive Reflection, with Implications for Biases and Fallacies in Probability JudgmentImproving communication of breast cancer recurrence risk.Pictures speak louder than numbers: on communicating medical risks to immigrants with limited non-native language proficiency.Understanding the role of numeracy in health: proposed theoretical framework and practical insights.Adolescents display distinctive tolerance to ambiguity and to uncertainty during risky decision making.Subjective judgements of synergistic risks: a cognitive reasoning perspective.Lymphoma in inflammatory bowel disease and treatment decisions.Chance, purpose, and progress in evolution and christianity.Assessing semantic coherence in conditional probability estimatesThe Love of Large Numbers: A Popularity Bias in Consumer Choice.Designing Visual Aids That Promote Risk Literacy: A Systematic Review of Health Research and Evidence-Based Design Heuristics.Effects of Numerical Versus Foreground-Only Icon Displays on Understanding of Risk Magnitudes.Exploring consumer opinions on the presentation of side-effects information in Australian Consumer Medicine Information leaflets.Controlled information integration and bayesian inference.The Empirical Case for Acquiescing to Intuition.The 1-in-X effect on the subjective assessment of medical probabilities.Decisive evidence on a smaller-than-you-think phenomenon: revisiting the "1-in-X" effect on subjective medical probabilities.Anomalies in the detection of change: When changes in sample size are mistaken for changes in proportions.Designing Graphs that Promote Both Risk Understanding and Behavior Change.
P2860
Q24273334-4DB271D8-0E6D-47F2-BC17-DC378F76E5E1Q24651866-91DDF4FE-E3E4-49FA-864A-22FC85306A74Q26797373-72666266-4FBE-41A4-B1A2-0ADE077EE45FQ26829289-5F20504C-1204-4247-83E4-66238AD20834Q26864906-F7606F41-106A-408B-B2B1-A85F3F8AC6CBQ28247559-8C2F8095-37D3-4151-9D59-9D348D7B907AQ28681293-72D4148C-3218-4268-B7A1-8613F8CE873DQ30557090-5F6881F9-2E01-40B3-B537-C40CB193BD7AQ33825862-6800B0FD-99A2-408F-9AE1-DECD07A378A1Q33835512-34F37E61-6685-4A77-8AE0-29876D957F83Q34017520-01C710E3-308A-4ED1-9DBD-D993D01EAB35Q34274126-DB5D6E7E-1CFC-4965-9ACF-1766C917BB6DQ34514193-75075850-A390-42B7-B443-7B555BED907CQ34661208-1A85E40F-DF91-4813-A8EA-B3E5E85F97C0Q34661266-25723828-99D9-4536-B857-A62FF7A0889AQ34735048-2EEF027C-6E9C-49C2-B517-9CB1641F8F37Q34990321-361FD47D-6DB1-4B67-B9CA-148B7B2CC7F6Q35597151-C0869A45-6665-4320-BE08-1FE15D92AEBDQ35831811-0FC0F0D3-BB28-455A-A519-DC0AE89A6E5EQ35856951-7BAB2D69-93B9-47F8-9F9C-2B291404519CQ36757864-10881178-5AB2-4911-81F8-85FE312B1C12Q37026287-C070D60A-CAEB-4622-8AEE-D1CA33CBDF84Q37124483-C22F4765-3902-4117-8312-C553278A6424Q37325525-C8005680-A1BC-43FB-90B6-98495044CE6AQ37441414-DDCA83E3-2561-4B66-AE0B-49FBED80C2F4Q37591420-4ADE90AA-036C-46FE-B2EE-3B3A63BCD650Q38002899-39FE9FF6-9341-4D8D-8B90-CA45CA12D0C4Q38024070-BBB69A2E-836D-4448-A0D5-946C40B499A5Q38431742-7DA2130D-9ACA-4D82-BA8F-DACC0EB8A2D2Q38492026-ECBB992E-1A31-4557-98E5-B7AEB85D01E5Q38616207-38C988BA-06F2-42D3-86C0-50F62349B554Q38963948-1A324D44-2ECC-4015-A451-C0AA93A45285Q40845421-F02FFFCE-8031-4532-8DA7-37F705EF41E8Q41368836-160E5238-B9BA-4FED-AE3D-DFA4A78B692EQ41852909-743474BC-241C-43B8-87ED-6A0B7288B7E5Q42697396-E59BA9FA-4A2B-4A4D-B34B-5145683FE465Q43924306-37D60BC6-FB49-4858-AB0E-7E3EEE6DDE02Q45894410-C5B53FDB-3B2A-4A45-9D5C-1AF93B585E1BQ47374743-8F4D6FA3-C945-4F73-BAC7-52A3DED2A5F8Q47605786-4FE82B8B-1A45-44AF-8BD0-06BA069D31A9
P2860
Numeracy, ratio bias, and denominator neglect in judgments of risk and probability
description
article
@en
wetenschappelijk artikel
@nl
наукова стаття, опублікована в січні 2008
@uk
name
Numeracy, ratio bias, and denominator neglect in judgments of risk and probability
@en
Numeracy, ratio bias, and denominator neglect in judgments of risk and probability
@nl
type
label
Numeracy, ratio bias, and denominator neglect in judgments of risk and probability
@en
Numeracy, ratio bias, and denominator neglect in judgments of risk and probability
@nl
prefLabel
Numeracy, ratio bias, and denominator neglect in judgments of risk and probability
@en
Numeracy, ratio bias, and denominator neglect in judgments of risk and probability
@nl
P1476
Numeracy, ratio bias, and denominator neglect in judgments of risk and probability
@en
P2093
Charles J. Brainerd
Valerie F. Reyna
P304
P356
10.1016/J.LINDIF.2007.03.011
P577
2008-01-01T00:00:00Z