Lower Risk of Revision With Patellar Tendon Autografts Compared With Hamstring Autografts
about
Registry data highlight increased revision rates for endobutton/biosure HA in ACL reconstruction with hamstring tendon autograft: a nationwide cohort study from the Norwegian Knee Ligament Registry, 2004-2013.Incidence of Second Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tears (1990-2000) and Associated Factors in a Specific Geographic Locale.Risk Factors and Predictors of Subsequent ACL Injury in Either Knee After ACL Reconstruction: Prospective Analysis of 2488 Primary ACL Reconstructions From the MOON Cohort.Hamstring Autograft versus Patellar Tendon Autograft for ACL Reconstruction: Is There a Difference in Graft Failure Rate? A Meta-analysis of 47,613 Patients.Quality of Life Following ACL Reconstruction: Baseline Predictors of Patient-Reported OutcomesAllograft tissue irradiation and failure rate after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A systematic review.Pain Assessment After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone Versus Hamstring Tendon Autograft.ACL reconstruction using 5- or 6-strand hamstring autograft provides graft's diameter bigger than 8 mm.Risk of Revision Was Not Reduced by a Double-bundle ACL Reconstruction Technique: Results From the Scandinavian Registers.Hospital for Special Surgery ACL Registry: 2-Year Outcomes Suggest Low Revision and Return to OR Rates.Criteria for Return to Sport after Anterior Cruciate Ligament reconstruction with lower reinjury risk (CR'STAL study): protocol for a prospective observational study in France.Analysis of 2019 Patients Undergoing Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction From a Community-Based Registry.Should Return to Sport be Delayed Until 2 Years After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction? Biological and Functional Considerations.Increased Risk of Revision After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone Allografts Compared With Autografts.Does Allograft Augmentation of Small-Diameter Hamstring Autograft ACL Grafts Reduce the Incidence of Graft Retear?Should the Ipsilateral Hamstrings Be Used for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in the Case of Medial Collateral Ligament Insufficiency? Biomechanical Investigation Regarding Dynamic Stabilization of the Medial Compartment by the Hamstring MPatient-based decision for resuming activity after ACL reconstruction: a single-centre experience.Potential serious bias in National Clinical Databases with low degree of reported follow-up.Predictors of Revision Surgery After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.Using pre-operative MRI to predict intraoperative hamstring graft size for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.A comparison of revision and rerupture rates of ACL reconstruction between autografts and allografts in the skeletally immature.Age-Related Risk Factors for Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Cohort Study of 21,304 Patients From the Kaiser Permanente Anterior Cruciate Ligament Registry.Management of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury?: What's In and What's Out?Practice Guidelines for the Management of Multiligamentous Injuries of the KneeEnhanced Bone-Tendon-Bone Approach for Open Anterior Cruciate Ligament Replacement With Conservation of the Joint Capsule.Increased incidence of anterior cruciate ligament revision surgery in paediatric verses adult population.Why registries analysing cruciate ligament surgery are important.The Effect of Autologous Hamstring Graft Diameter on the Likelihood for Revision of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.The Incidence of Subsequent Meniscal Surgery Is Higher in the Anterior Cruciate Ligament-Reconstructed Knee Than in the Contralateral Knee.Increased Risk of Revision After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Soft Tissue Allografts Compared With Autografts: Graft Processing and Time Make a Difference.Compensation after treatment for anterior cruciate ligament injuries: a review of compensation claims in Norway from 2005 to 2015.A Novel Approach for Meniscal Regeneration Using Kartogenin-Treated Autologous Tendon Graft.20-Year Outcomes of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Hamstring Tendon Autograft: The Catastrophic Effect of Age and Posterior Tibial Slope.Can the outside-in half-tunnel technique reduce femoral tunnel widening in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction? A CT study.The Evolving Treatment Patterns of NCAA Division I Football Players by Orthopaedic Team Physicians Over the Past Decade, 2008-2016.Arthroscopic Anatomic Single-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone Autograft: Pearls for an Accurate Reconstruction.A Randomized Controlled Trial With Mean 16-Year Follow-up Comparing Hamstring and Patellar Tendon Autografts in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.[Subsequent damage following soccer injuries].ESSKA helps making a change: the example of handball medicineCan tape-screw fixation of a quadrupled semitendinosus graft in a full-length tibial tunnel provide superior fixation compared with a doubled semitendinosus-gracilis held with an interference screw? A matched-pair cadaveric biomechanical comparison
P2860
Q30952191-2F2AEE3D-D7E6-46F1-B1DB-3DD05902254CQ33917174-0EEAD89F-4DCE-439F-B502-1F98A78FE424Q36148073-A63CBBD4-0363-463F-B48C-A9D0BE2A6E54Q36282124-92273F43-0C56-4294-8A36-1BE9B06A42F6Q36523018-2F756F09-9613-4370-A1C0-5CD5AD33A127Q37014788-1441C5EB-B3B2-463E-9968-02398EFA041AQ37632356-AE6FD526-3E46-432B-ACC0-A0B5FCDFD9ABQ38635638-9AE7F156-20D7-418A-A9ED-1F17EFB2B006Q38669145-30569698-0179-459A-AF3E-F7C8164135C6Q38687480-469B7283-2D47-485A-A0F8-BCCFF982323DQ38699274-9D80D860-A0A0-4850-B4CA-E60D8541F682Q38828849-3B2450A8-3B20-40CB-822F-2B5DC3DCC912Q38893373-E2F85F18-346B-4A49-85FE-4908745931D3Q38917914-CEFCBF6B-558F-4436-A37A-036E316B487DQ39049202-1C229ED8-EFB3-40CB-B013-B0DF2DC3F0D4Q39059066-B0973F40-D48D-40E8-9266-0EA5FDBF7061Q39348783-59E88149-8117-437F-BD80-E05593D1BBCDQ39475994-B3742B03-993E-49B2-8B8F-1C570EA8809AQ39494590-FA9D0794-9EC7-4CB6-BC4D-3C92152ED96DQ39578869-EC45B691-86EB-4BFD-BA1E-D0A3D36993D9Q40010771-A799C62A-0F91-4180-B1D7-92AB80CC281FQ40242127-45CF753F-E085-4AB2-A1F0-179F4FA0B479Q41665720-0C1E43AE-29F6-4B92-9C35-57592EBD791CQ41665739-A0D05F47-F94C-4C10-8CA9-B69D0396D47AQ42021812-E320EEC0-D669-4E5C-900E-D8E284D7F75BQ42693152-83D88FA0-C98E-49B5-AB67-6104B69382D1Q44181613-7E835ACA-09BA-41DF-BCA9-DD2D16B454C9Q45198514-5AEA1064-B7CA-4A6C-B274-3FE89D9ED31FQ46392591-C2AC9C78-282C-46BB-8E9B-D1298E5E2379Q46485257-BA0A0208-487E-4FF2-83BB-AF7A60E61C85Q47404537-B4A19307-A2EC-4DCB-B600-9BBCC379EFE2Q47733057-6E26CD8F-CC28-4476-8346-840637BAC860Q48535316-4A91E014-0F79-4D2E-A3E3-5458AEB67C59Q48667664-ED8BDB8D-00D4-454A-9327-312AFF2A806AQ49342328-CDB24AB4-977A-44BC-AEF7-BA31B8D30C27Q49891021-4E7CA996-BE52-4A6C-BFF4-CB544F22EBC1Q53091244-F7387C1F-53F5-4435-B4D1-FDADB61F1D3FQ53810376-99BE3680-EC42-4382-A04D-3636B53F5DFBQ56636291-607D66CF-1ACB-4060-87DD-5AF4C8B221B5Q58731873-63EC6DC1-E703-49D0-80F9-A581BC2CA5B2
P2860
Lower Risk of Revision With Patellar Tendon Autografts Compared With Hamstring Autografts
description
im September 2014 veröffentlichter wissenschaftlicher Artikel
@de
wetenschappelijk artikel
@nl
наукова стаття, опублікована у вересні 2014
@uk
name
Lower Risk of Revision With Patellar Tendon Autografts Compared With Hamstring Autografts
@en
Lower Risk of Revision With Patellar Tendon Autografts Compared With Hamstring Autografts
@nl
type
label
Lower Risk of Revision With Patellar Tendon Autografts Compared With Hamstring Autografts
@en
Lower Risk of Revision With Patellar Tendon Autografts Compared With Hamstring Autografts
@nl
prefLabel
Lower Risk of Revision With Patellar Tendon Autografts Compared With Hamstring Autografts
@en
Lower Risk of Revision With Patellar Tendon Autografts Compared With Hamstring Autografts
@nl
P2093
P2860
P50
P356
P1476
Lower Risk of Revision With Patellar Tendon Autografts Compared With Hamstring Autografts
@en
P2093
Grethe Albrektsen
Martin Lind
Olav A. Foss
Tone Gifstad
P2860
P304
P356
10.1177/0363546514548164
P577
2014-09-08T00:00:00Z