The performance of different propensity-score methods for estimating relative risks
about
Applications of propensity score methods in observational comparative effectiveness and safety research: where have we come and where should we go?Care needs and clinical outcomes of older people with dementia: a population-based propensity score-matched cohort studyOpen-access colonoscopy on Ontario: associated factors and quality.[Procalcitonin as a tool for the assessment of successful therapy of severe sepsis : An analysis using clinical routine data].Comparative effectiveness of the hepatitis C virus protease inhibitors boceprevir and telaprevir in a large U.S. cohort.Comparison of methylprednisolone plus prednisolone with prednisolone alone as initial treatment in adult-onset minimal change disease: a retrospective cohort studyTiming of renal replacement therapy initiation by AKIN classification system.Review of inverse probability weighting for dealing with missing data.Propensity score applied to survival data analysis through proportional hazards models: a Monte Carlo study.The influence of neighborhood environment on the incidence of childhood asthma: a propensity score approach.Performance of propensity score methods when comparison groups originate from different data sources.Trends in use of and reproductive outcomes associated with intracytoplasmic sperm injection.Overall survival differences between patients with inflammatory and noninflammatory breast cancer presenting with distant metastasis at diagnosisInverse probability weighting and doubly robust methods in correcting the effects of non-response in the reimbursed medication and self-reported turnout estimates in the ATH survey.Adverse effect profile of trichlormethiazide: a retrospective observational study.The performance of different propensity-score methods for estimating differences in proportions (risk differences or absolute risk reductions) in observational studies.A comparison of confounding adjustment methods with an application to early life determinants of childhood obesityImproving propensity score estimators' robustness to model misspecification using super learner.A Tutorial and Case Study in Propensity Score Analysis: An Application to Estimating the Effect of In-Hospital Smoking Cessation Counseling on MortalityApplying propensity score methods in medical research: pitfalls and prospects.Relaxation Response and Resiliency Training and Its Effect on Healthcare Resource Utilization.Evaluating the effect of hospital and insurance type on the risk of 1-year mortality of very low birth weight infants: controlling for selection bias.On the use of propensity scores in case of rare exposure.Serum Uric Acid Level Predicts Progression of IgA Nephropathy in Females but Not in Males.Optimal full matching for survival outcomes: a method that merits more widespread use.Population-based study on association between birth weight and risk of asthma: a propensity score approach.Statin use and clinical outcomes in older men: a prospective population-based study.Fractures in users of antidepressants and anxiolytics and sedatives: effects of age and doseAssociation of hormonal contraceptive use with reduced levels of depressive symptoms: a national study of sexually active women in the United States.Use and misuse of multivariable approaches in interventional cardiology studies on drug-eluting stents: a systematic review.Patient mortality following alcohol use and trauma: a propensity-matched analysis.Propensity scores: from naive enthusiasm to intuitive understanding.Hepatitis C treatment failure is associated with increased risk of hepatocellular carcinoma.A diabetes pay-for-performance program and the competing causes of death among cancer survivors with type 2 diabetes in Taiwan.Practice-Based Research: Ex Post Facto Evaluation of Evidence-Based Police Practices Implemented in Residential Burglary Micro-Time Hot Spots.Estimating the effect of treatment on binary outcomes using full matching on the propensity score.The performance of different propensity score methods for estimating absolute effects of treatments on survival outcomes: A simulation studyStatistical criteria for selecting the optimal number of untreated subjects matched to each treated subject when using many-to-one matching on the propensity score.Comparing paired vs non-paired statistical methods of analyses when making inferences about absolute risk reductions in propensity-score matched samples.An Introduction to Propensity Score Methods for Reducing the Effects of Confounding in Observational Studies.
P2860
Q26849372-55515D9A-ADCC-42CB-A5AA-679E77FBCA04Q28547135-E4636380-D702-4E48-A530-CC202057B7B5Q30486210-15894E14-7E66-4BA3-AF48-5B49695E6FEAQ31112286-32888F1E-AF9A-4CAC-A24A-AC92497C4B7AQ33411348-02EDF154-162B-4D00-9042-F72F38EA2FBEQ33715862-58DCC5BF-A441-4F82-B3F4-33BC28861C98Q33754645-A08F1828-4D5D-4167-9761-35EE3E9BC456Q33789752-B95862C4-D187-46AF-98E9-7EB180E29FF4Q34192609-C90BFD02-3FBB-4C14-BD1F-0AA95AD0198CQ34232749-67B0FCC0-F497-4F76-807C-D951BB68EB6AQ34254294-05211A9C-134C-4E7C-B106-8373D6923021Q34458807-0EE6C4DA-7A1C-49CF-83DD-1AB940A921C5Q34478105-04E41DB2-00B3-48BF-B900-8A2220C041A5Q34581592-611F417E-95D2-452A-9805-7EE4BE885EDDQ34629402-CD844DFE-580B-4D85-96D5-62CA21E8C9B6Q34745086-1E67C9AE-BC82-4891-BA1B-5EEEE2D9630DQ35109434-C773D093-9836-4614-8A40-94763213CFF2Q35152699-2B800DAE-C89D-4915-B0C8-E71E9DB31518Q35699877-5ADF32A0-C064-4FBF-B68C-D1FCBBCACF7DQ35710639-3BDD2EA3-AA1A-487F-AB43-514F1B719096Q35804692-FF90D5B6-E5D9-40EA-98EC-3A32D2AAFD47Q35836841-3FD08428-752A-4064-8A84-A1355B74B7CAQ35977320-B60FF1C7-D73A-4F41-8DD5-B89646EF22A2Q36113184-F95BB8BF-4DDE-43DC-96F1-0461B049074FQ36470536-506A780F-5EF5-4B63-82FD-23E40AB8DDC9Q36481494-BE2725B9-514C-460C-A4F5-8424AE39F741Q36730168-26F554DD-5235-4592-B8F6-A2F982EF75A5Q36855935-ABD13401-EF64-49C2-B332-47C8EF7F61CEQ37463944-892316E5-01F7-4B8B-9236-2A850894980FQ38033691-1D6AA3E3-5DEF-4314-97B4-D5C7879A656CQ38784320-86CCF800-4C31-48AF-AB24-942F0D0F50B1Q39790382-E35624AE-E0A4-400F-B7E0-1B26A7768430Q39877443-2F0242CB-C1FA-4E15-BE63-327EA833F31BQ40190963-CF03E195-6A5F-440F-BE70-26AB3FBF9F21Q40565090-2DE8CA6B-F127-42AC-86AC-2B5659E0E5D1Q40584859-69BCBC56-B32D-4B5A-956E-D4867932C093Q41334676-1ADBE53B-2A7B-4678-9D15-3D711B2B6733Q41787175-99AC6F75-9DCF-470C-A0C4-B0D0F5742C77Q41866145-6451B954-FF6B-402A-9DE0-37FC12F27B44Q41962966-2A149076-2536-4931-93CF-301112FF651F
P2860
The performance of different propensity-score methods for estimating relative risks
description
article
@en
im Juni 2008 veröffentlichter wissenschaftlicher Artikel
@de
wetenschappelijk artikel
@nl
наукова стаття, опублікована в червні 2008
@uk
name
The performance of different propensity-score methods for estimating relative risks
@en
The performance of different propensity-score methods for estimating relative risks
@nl
type
label
The performance of different propensity-score methods for estimating relative risks
@en
The performance of different propensity-score methods for estimating relative risks
@nl
prefLabel
The performance of different propensity-score methods for estimating relative risks
@en
The performance of different propensity-score methods for estimating relative risks
@nl
P1476
The performance of different propensity-score methods for estimating relative risks
@en
P2093
Peter C. Austin
P304
P356
10.1016/J.JCLINEPI.2007.07.011
P577
2008-02-14T00:00:00Z