The role for pragmatic randomized controlled trials (pRCTs) in comparative effectiveness research
about
Practice-based Research Networks (PBRNs) in the Era of Integrated Delivery SystemsStakeholders' views on the ethical challenges of pragmatic trials investigating pharmaceutical drugs.Clinical Comparative Effectiveness Research Through the Lens of Healthcare DecisionmakersEfficacy and safety of a four-drug fixed-dose combination regimen versus separate drugs for treatment of pulmonary tuberculosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Atrial fibrillation in women: treatmentImplementing Kanyini GAP, a pragmatic randomised controlled trial in Australia: findings from a qualitative studyComparison of conventional medicine, TCM treatment, and combination of both conventional medicine and TCM treatment for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: study protocol of a randomized comparative effectiveness research trial.PROspective Multicenter Imaging Study for Evaluation of chest pain: rationale and design of the PROMISE trialApplying the Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) approach to a large pragmatic study involving safety net clinics.The role of pragmatic clinical trials in the evolution of learning health systems.Improving chronic disease prevention and screening in primary care: results of the BETTER pragmatic cluster randomized controlled trial.Obtaining real-world evidence: the Salford Lung Study.Improving care for depression and suicide risk in adolescents: innovative strategies for bringing treatments to community settingsThe Patient-centered Outcomes Research Institute's Role in Advancing Methods for Patient-centered Outcomes ResearchA pilot study of simple interventions to improve informed consent in clinical research: feasibility, approach, and resultsAlternation as a form of allocation for quality improvement studies in primary healthcare settings: the on-off study design.Gatekeepers for pragmatic clinical trials.Quality improvement and practice-based research in neurology using the electronic medical record.Moxibustion for pain relief in patients with primary dysmenorrhea: A randomized controlled trial.A guide to research partnerships for pragmatic clinical trials.Cardiac rehabilitation referral and enrolment across an academic health sciences centre with eReferral and peer navigation: a randomised controlled pilot trial.Economic support to improve tuberculosis treatment outcomes in South Africa: a pragmatic cluster-randomized controlled trial.Effects of dementia-care mapping on residents and staff of care homes: a pragmatic cluster-randomised controlled trial.Bayesian adaptive trials offer advantages in comparative effectiveness trials: an example in status epilepticusMaking clinical trials more relevant: improving and validating the PRECIS tool for matching trial design decisions to trial purpose.Examining the use of process evaluations of randomised controlled trials of complex interventions addressing chronic disease in primary health care-a systematic review protocol.New methods for determining comparative effectiveness in rheumatoid arthritisAdaptive designs for comparative effectiveness research trials.The role of hospital payments in the adoption of new medical technologies: an international survey of current practice.Comparative effectiveness of indacaterol/glycopyrronium in the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.The future of dementia risk reduction research: barriers and solutions.Recent controversies on comparative effectiveness research investigations: Challenges, opportunities, and pitfalls.A 7-Year Longitudinal Trial of the Safety and Efficacy of a Vitamin/Mineral Enhanced Plant-Sourced Calcium Supplement.Statistical issues in pragmatic trials of behavioral economic interventions.Therapeutic inferences for individual patients.Pre-study feasibility and identifying sensitivity analyses for protocol pre-specification in comparative effectiveness research.Veterans Healthcare Administration providers' attitudes and perceptions regarding pragmatic trials embedded at the point of care.A comparison of meta-analytic methods for synthesizing evidence from explanatory and pragmatic trials.Effectiveness of an additional individualized multi-component complementary medicine treatment on health-related quality of life in breast cancer patients: a pragmatic randomized trial.Predictors of patient's intentions to participate in pragmatic clinical trials: An initial exploration.
P2860
Q26782041-8BF97080-DCED-48A0-86C1-A3CEC23EBEEBQ27332116-3A30A82D-D95C-45D3-83E3-6DB1E87D9349Q28085245-15672F41-64FE-4CAA-BB39-FFBA011D9822Q30239768-0B61AE37-5054-4A03-A82F-2CFCFBBB4946Q30241862-6DD6F7F8-73BE-4A84-B441-F22C53BE41D2Q30665354-410C04BB-B4B7-43DD-A370-060FA20243C2Q33597916-AA4746E2-22D4-45FD-B9EF-9C1D4CA00925Q33708527-611292A8-EB1C-4700-869B-B23903482DF6Q33814928-7836E9A1-B9BB-4CBD-A2FC-AEE915CDC968Q33957854-9D622752-B661-4E2F-8DC7-C41ECEF03AF4Q34477982-C02822DD-7135-4377-83E4-50A559B30D0CQ34608276-7BFAE9D6-6522-4642-BE4A-9E0150BF7058Q34969424-8138E3C2-DDF3-48BF-9B34-CF6A7116B30BQ35107208-CAAD30DC-DCDC-4A0D-A93F-BB3D181757BDQ35132491-EF5783CA-7CD1-4B27-99B6-7AC909C8F54FQ35994790-8F1F0836-E90E-483D-A659-9EDB4CA2F628Q36118092-0890B205-AF20-4368-99E7-49F4B6F97E31Q36251302-B75755EA-70DA-49C0-ACF0-B8E302B0D978Q36272794-C6ECEE60-B013-4C87-812E-923E2D6BC4DCQ36449415-682BEC8D-FD4E-4106-8B65-897052BA944DQ36732838-939F1C51-75B7-44EF-8A39-F94B4375495FQ36922757-3DD09CBB-B72B-45B3-89D0-8265F3D6E347Q36976551-C1CF37E9-B4D7-49D8-89B1-9B2BA3A11A17Q37095607-BEF04A3C-032A-4777-B97F-FE2428FEFE14Q37108986-A938B134-1EB2-4B4B-9A83-6DA2B4532AE4Q37178693-3B7D4D4A-BE17-4EF8-823B-4EAA921A3B5FQ37274242-5865573C-C71A-408B-8A16-3C47437A26BEQ37357578-3C63F342-804C-407F-9B02-0EE68C9A358BQ38260802-B41FA2BF-6A13-462C-ACB5-EDBE98FF6348Q38608618-69F26330-95D9-4E6C-B0B6-BA6B2A0B1D60Q38815158-53C29597-0176-4EDE-9D6A-8DC10490F211Q39595515-0911D815-E948-4A2A-8061-07CFA81F15FCQ39991176-53C6921B-D355-4D1B-B6AB-4D885089274EQ40672679-B03418DF-7C40-4582-9059-3627D8E67591Q41685481-23DFE8DE-29D4-4F41-BF99-61B952F99624Q45164813-FA0BE51A-A704-4FC7-9695-E1B516B1DCAEQ45329011-25F157D5-6125-470D-B5FF-EF65B2F43C68Q47839541-BA7A8F3B-E423-4F88-9B8C-3817FD15B4C5Q48054476-44067260-5FE2-4567-962E-28DB10E8B790Q48062017-045A3416-46B5-4B89-9A05-C5BBF6841394
P2860
The role for pragmatic randomized controlled trials (pRCTs) in comparative effectiveness research
description
article
@en
im Juli 2012 veröffentlichter wissenschaftlicher Artikel
@de
wetenschappelijk artikel
@nl
наукова стаття, опублікована в липні 2012
@uk
name
The role for pragmatic randomi ...... arative effectiveness research
@en
The role for pragmatic randomized controlled trials
@nl
type
label
The role for pragmatic randomi ...... arative effectiveness research
@en
The role for pragmatic randomized controlled trials
@nl
prefLabel
The role for pragmatic randomi ...... arative effectiveness research
@en
The role for pragmatic randomized controlled trials
@nl
P2093
P2860
P356
P1433
P1476
The role for pragmatic randomi ...... arative effectiveness research
@en
P2093
Danielle Whicher
Kalipso Chalkidou
Robert Fowler
Sean Tunis
P2860
P304
P356
10.1177/1740774512450097
P577
2012-07-02T00:00:00Z