Conflicting stories about public scientific controversies: Effects of news convergence and divergence on scientists’ credibility
about
Is extinction forever?Against conventional wisdom: when the public, the media, and medical practice collide.I am right, you are wrong: how biased assimilation increases the perceived gap between believers and skeptics of violent video game effects.Poor replication validity of biomedical association studies reported by newspapers.The media and cancer: education or entertainment? An ethnographic study of European cancer journalists.Where civics meets science: building science for the public good through Civic Science.The Influence of Weight-of-Evidence Messages on (Vaccine) Attitudes: A Sequential Mediation Model.Communicating Uncertain Science to the Public: How Amount and Source of Uncertainty Impact Fatalism, Backlash, and Overload.To vape or not to vape? Effects of exposure to conflicting news headlines on beliefs about harms and benefits of electronic cigarette use: Results from a randomized controlled experiment.Men's and women's responses to two-sided health news coverage: a moderated mediation model.Including "evidentiary balance" in news media coverage of vaccine risk.Source-specific Exposure to Contradictory Nutrition Information: Documenting Prevalence and Effects on Adverse Cognitive and Behavioral Outcomes.Scientific uncertainty in media content: Introduction to this special issue.Frames of scientific evidence: How journalists represent the (un)certainty of molecular medicine in science television programs.Fatalism and exposure to health information from the media: examining the evidence for causal influenceSeeking Congruency or Incongruency Online?Science Exemplars in the Eye of the Beholder
P2860
Q28649402-56A88096-8C9D-4CF1-A1BB-3500EF7FFBB2Q33645368-0E2DE466-C02E-4419-84EC-70FEDDE2D7F5Q35145430-230BFC55-F336-4DE7-9DE9-E6D0245A61EEQ36286246-43151B51-7F3E-42EF-AD75-4855C91A902DQ37721484-6CC3023B-0CEA-4773-BA33-3D367D4AAF37Q38889119-1D5CBA10-2BB1-433A-93BC-B7DE693A6EF0Q45016851-B9A59371-87A2-4098-9662-648EC311B4E6Q47153582-9CD88DB1-249C-4BF5-8C85-0B11D0C72274Q47706103-EA0596B2-ADA0-420E-B920-8DB415A5506CQ47866073-2176C2C4-4CF7-464B-AD47-5B4D34DFB4EBQ50305917-1797929D-CEF8-47C8-8613-6E48FAF2E10FQ53666276-931CACCD-B2DC-4215-A981-D0678ACCB21DQ53676954-CBE255FA-C735-4720-9DC4-827A71EA23F9Q54530660-07271A46-2B5C-4CAA-92A5-E36C3DCE2097Q58186600-12DB89E8-A016-4464-925A-A79B80621C96Q58214378-AF41FED1-FE77-4052-8F39-54241FACC8EBQ58614053-EFCEB9AB-6BB3-4B73-9B8D-F45CD5CD9A7A
P2860
Conflicting stories about public scientific controversies: Effects of news convergence and divergence on scientists’ credibility
description
im November 2010 veröffentlichter wissenschaftlicher Artikel
@de
wetenschappelijk artikel
@nl
наукова стаття, опублікована в листопаді 2010
@uk
name
Conflicting stories about publ ...... nce on scientists’ credibility
@en
Conflicting stories about publ ...... nce on scientists’ credibility
@nl
type
label
Conflicting stories about publ ...... nce on scientists’ credibility
@en
Conflicting stories about publ ...... nce on scientists’ credibility
@nl
prefLabel
Conflicting stories about publ ...... nce on scientists’ credibility
@en
Conflicting stories about publ ...... nce on scientists’ credibility
@nl
P2860
P356
P1476
Conflicting stories about publ ...... nce on scientists’ credibility
@en
P2093
Jakob D. Jensen
Ryan J. Hurley
P2860
P304
P356
10.1177/0963662510387759
P577
2010-11-23T00:00:00Z