about
Pleasure in decision-making situations.Hiding personal information reveals the worstOmission bias and pertussis vaccinationA call to honesty: extending religious priming of moral behavior to Middle Eastern MuslimsCommission, Omission, and Dissonance Reduction: Coping with Regret in the "Monty Hall" ProblemA person-centered approach to moral judgment.Morals and markets.Everybody else is doing it: exploring social transmission of lying behavior.Prescriber barriers and enablers to minimising potentially inappropriate medications in adults: a systematic review and thematic synthesis.The role of conscious reasoning and intuition in moral judgment: testing three principles of harm.Sins of omission: getting too little medical care may be the greatest threat to patient safety.Action and valence modulate choice and choice-induced preference change.A matter of perspective: choosing for others differs from choosing for yourself in making treatment decisionsSocial redistribution of pain and money.Is there an omission effect in prosocial behavior? A laboratory experiment on passive vs. active generosity.Judgment before principle: engagement of the frontoparietal control network in condemning harms of omission.Using vignettes to explore judgements of patients about safety and quality of care: the role of outcome and relationship with the care provider.The egoism and altruism of intergenerational behavior.Avoiding bias in medical ethical decision-making. Lessons to be learnt from psychology research.The twin traps of overtreatment and therapeutic nihilism in clinical practice.Cognitive biases and heuristics in medical decision making: a critical review using a systematic search strategy.A quantum probability perspective on borderline vagueness.The Costs and Benefits of Calculation and Moral Rules.Making Vaccine Messaging Stick: Perceived Causal Instability as a Barrier to Effective Vaccine Messaging.Acceptability of In Utero Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for Sickle Cell Disease.Cognitive biases can affect moral intuitions about cognitive enhancement.Can cognitive psychological research on reasoning enhance the discussion around moral judgments?Are medical outcomes fungible? A survey of voters, medical administrators, and physicians.Pathways to poor anticoagulation control.Action, outcome, and value: a dual-system framework for morality.A mediator model to predict workplace influenza vaccination behaviour--an application of the health action process approach.Can decision analysis help us decide whether ultrasound screening for fetal anomalies is worth it?Modulating what is and what could have been: The effect of transcranial direct current stimulation on the evaluation of attained and unattained decision outcomes.Considering Roads Taken and Not Taken: How Psychological Distance Influences the Framing of Choice Events.What makes moral dilemma judgments "utilitarian" or "deontological"?Resolving the Meat-Paradox: A Motivational Account of Morally Troublesome Behavior and Its Maintenance.Omission bias and perceived intention in children and adults.The Theory of Dyadic Morality: Reinventing Moral Judgment by Redefining Harm.Patterns of moral judgment derive from nonmoral psychological representations.Who shalt not kill? Individual differences in working memory capacity, executive control, and moral judgment.
P2860
Q24794648-7735E697-CBE7-45CE-81CC-E578DB70E2B6Q27318391-DA183F21-54AD-41C2-9AA4-4B84E4A3F5D2Q28244772-BDB7F36A-365F-4EEC-9E63-351BF6A88C6FQ28656062-5F6AD79E-E587-4E6A-8894-833CFBCEF17FQ30047684-106BB57A-1F17-4D3A-AB6E-566F0AC77C9CQ30374101-DC7D1D57-4BF2-424B-A817-8AE0C04AD679Q30430306-8D5EBF96-CE50-41FD-9503-BA46D285315CQ34343715-9A372F4A-C7FA-4421-A98B-3F627F5BD05EQ34452703-01CE4545-FCB1-4ED4-9526-1A02E76150ECQ34597456-7C9C0D0E-39BA-4663-948E-C4CC92EA5BADQ34723789-15AF5A32-C7B9-49A9-8850-618DA62C62BEQ35154701-E60DFCD2-F6F8-4333-95FD-78AA92810A5CQ35901385-6D0F676C-8792-4930-B627-6F35C20A3A18Q36226999-36E31AC1-291A-4E7E-B3F5-D530BA259021Q36293888-F688031C-1CE4-4EF4-A1F4-9A0F06B2F21CQ36410091-72DE144A-6D66-47A7-8159-F2DE8D0FEB81Q37332697-166F41E2-FC1D-4BC4-B511-C3B2CDF21155Q37538056-6BFAB9C1-76C3-4234-A88C-9657D1EBFFE4Q37774911-20E71A75-3BA2-49F9-AFC3-DC754F539E79Q38170540-E8AF9449-2AE0-4B56-9A7D-F8FF914D33DDQ38242008-867F9094-6656-474D-B316-D4878A2EBF54Q38444483-C3B1784D-0D3B-47C4-BC77-82374401C523Q38544875-075E0640-B520-4A47-ADCA-ADD1FE29510AQ38662095-312538D8-B4B2-4D69-BCF8-C18ABBB154D9Q38685531-E058638C-AC37-43E9-B5FF-41E095F47BE1Q41840279-A9A6179A-D6D8-4BDF-A85B-D466732B9F46Q42431354-CC9DE531-AB2C-4D33-B470-2656C3F206A7Q44286037-63EAA814-866C-4FE4-AF7A-D2A6B4807713Q44607030-241E2E87-AC2F-4082-9954-BF1029FC183AQ44763727-16A9A844-EA66-4E4F-BDD1-C90FC8367A33Q45119586-2FB24436-1C1E-4CDE-A603-19C98794D6A0Q46481845-F6458372-8D5B-4474-8127-DAB3536115EFQ47291688-9E5207B9-B8FA-4346-A80B-5E7FDE14B301Q47321069-DB92FD31-77A8-4578-843C-D6BA55B13BC0Q47378263-F26E2E5D-9C1E-406B-81C3-AF9BBE307B77Q47426482-5CFA9694-66A2-4880-B21B-4274F8029A96Q47672090-0923C6DB-49CC-4798-9635-CA3A2960ED49Q47870798-F2151703-6C8F-4EF4-BDCC-F0D0B5B8D0EBQ48121536-851C69BF-3601-4DEC-BAFF-E4D469FAD921Q48336258-4197A15A-2CFA-4576-A234-55307E8FECAB
P2860
description
im Januar 1991 veröffentlichter wissenschaftlicher Artikel
@de
wetenschappelijk artikel
@nl
наукова стаття, опублікована в січні 1991
@uk
name
Omission and commission in judgment and choice
@en
Omission and commission in judgment and choice
@nl
type
label
Omission and commission in judgment and choice
@en
Omission and commission in judgment and choice
@nl
prefLabel
Omission and commission in judgment and choice
@en
Omission and commission in judgment and choice
@nl
P2093
P1476
Omission and commission in judgment and choice
@en
P2093
Elisa Minsk
Jonathan Baron
Mark Spranca
P304
P356
10.1016/0022-1031(91)90011-T
P577
1991-01-01T00:00:00Z