about
Do informed consent documents for cancer trials do what they should? A study of manifest and latent functionsINVESTIGATE-I (INVasive Evaluation before Surgical Treatment of Incontinence Gives Added Therapeutic Effect?): study protocol for a mixed methods study to assess the feasibility of a future randomised controlled trial of the clinical utility of invaStakeholder perspectives on the development of a virtual clinic for diabetes care: qualitative study.Assessing professional equipoise and views about a future clinical trial of invasive urodynamics prior to surgery for stress urinary incontinence in women: a survey within a mixed methods feasibility studyA cluster randomized controlled trial of the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of intermediate care clinics for diabetes (ICCD): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.Patient perspectives on health advice posted on Internet discussion boards: a qualitative study.Optimizing patient involvement in quality improvement.The sociology of medical screening: past, present and future.Quality improvement through clinical communities: eight lessons for practice.Reciprocal peer review for quality improvement: an ethnographic case study of the Improving Lung Cancer Outcomes Project.Doing diagnosis: whether and how clinicians use a diagnostic tool of uncertain clinical utility.Incidental findings from clinical sequencing in Greece: reporting experts' attitudes.Unblinding following trial participation: qualitative study of participants' perspectives.Standard- or high-dose oxytocin for nulliparous women with confirmed delay in labour: quantitative and qualitative results from a pilot randomised controlled trial.Using ethnography to study improving healthcare: reflections on the 'ethnographic' label.Taking the heat or taking the temperature? A qualitative study of a large-scale exercise in seeking to measure for improvement, not blame.The role of primary care professionals in women's experiences of cervical cancer screening: a qualitative study‘Oh dear, should I really be saying that on here?’: Issues of identity and authority in an online diabetes communityPilot study of a virtual diabetes clinic: satisfaction and usabilityInvolving Patients and the Public in E-Health ResearchPreliminary test of an Internet-based diabetes self-management toolDiscourse and the individual in cervical cancer screeningWeaving meaning? An exploration of the interplay between lay and professional understandings of cervical cancer riskConceptualizing resistanceOverdiagnosis and overtreatment as a quality problem: insights from healthcare improvement researchUnderstanding medical overuse: the case of problematic polypharmacy and the potential of ethnographyOverruling uncertainty about preventative medications: the social organisation of healthcare professionals' knowledge and practices'They don't know themselves, so how can they tell us?': parents navigating uncertainty at the frontiers of neonatal surgery
P50
Q28816164-BC957F66-919B-465A-9410-B01F4C0A75DDQ35153872-7D471ECD-C590-4BC5-9855-9B87875EBB85Q36101075-2B26C16E-B8EE-4DC4-8D1D-E5E20CE6A9FBQ36419277-C09D28FA-A0DD-4BA3-83D8-73806DCAC22FQ36440704-B7ADB2D3-777E-4F96-8986-D8B31437EAF0Q37332454-DF422F4D-0C4E-4AA1-9772-AD10138BFD55Q37442721-33AFD172-3507-488E-AF44-9F6949946E22Q37988596-018BF87D-9F6F-4E9F-8B97-3ED3808B455FQ38031528-74355A9C-B41C-40EC-A3E9-6387EF40B73AQ38033525-1A3F33FA-56B3-4441-96F4-0ED602EADA32Q39122652-AB54DBBB-1D77-4DF8-8025-13EA2B183AA3Q42076817-951B178D-D084-4ED3-8DD6-D4FB18088F79Q43992708-E69FA9A5-EB0E-442E-8368-DD8739C20619Q44626814-D915DEE5-F6C3-44A4-B989-E146ECE75211Q49790124-FACEE3E9-5FCB-4F8C-98AB-335580FB5A68Q49900800-BC862C55-D282-4EC1-B8A9-241C0E806717Q57538007-5A80A604-18F1-47DB-A4C3-B6B6B700985CQ61889357-BB2B6147-8DDC-44E5-8797-63F94E88F666Q61889391-BFA5B340-38CA-4729-BC99-17FB52AB4094Q61889393-8B99CB7D-F9E7-4F5B-9C09-762F878B3528Q61889396-847C12D4-124E-4B46-8812-C91AE75A3EBBQ79422446-11CCA678-0648-41E3-9BC5-F10B7BB1169FQ81669718-1471AEBE-7BB5-4129-BBCB-AB3D1A623F60Q84637030-BED1B39D-AEF8-4FF9-BD2D-76B5FF2CDE38Q88152395-55E4D743-C214-4702-A67A-9D10AE216B2FQ88371109-6BC32988-0DA1-4517-9FC1-5C046E3751B8Q91365139-EE5255ED-BC9B-4A7C-A9F4-213BE6446DE5Q91803178-630BD11A-35D0-4BE4-9FDA-3D46534416E0
P50
description
researcher ORCID ID = 0000-0003-4046-0119
@en
wetenschapper
@nl
name
N Armstrong
@ast
N Armstrong
@nl
Natalie Armstrong
@en
Natalie Armstrong
@es
type
label
N Armstrong
@ast
N Armstrong
@nl
Natalie Armstrong
@en
Natalie Armstrong
@es
altLabel
N Armstrong
@en
prefLabel
N Armstrong
@ast
N Armstrong
@nl
Natalie Armstrong
@en
Natalie Armstrong
@es
P1006
P244
P1006
P106
P1153
22978636800
P21
P214
117145857813323020020
P244
n2012182661
P31
P496
0000-0003-4046-0119
P734
P7859
lccn-n2012182661