Tweets vs. Mendeley readers: How do these two social media metrics differ?
about
Revisiting an open access monograph experiment: measuring citations and tweets 5 years later.Astrophysicists' conversational connections on TwitterHow to normalize Twitter counts? A first attempt based on journals in the Twitter Index.How quickly do publications get read? The evolution of mendeley reader counts for new articlesAre Mendeley reader counts useful impact indicators in all fields?Do Mendeley reader counts indicate the value of arts and humanities research?Why do papers have many Mendeley readers but few Scopus-indexed citations and vice versa?Does Mendeley provide evidence of the educational value of journal articles?Are Mendeley reader counts high enough for research evaluations when articles are published?Mendeley readership counts: An investigation of temporal and disciplinary differencesMendeley readership altmetrics for medical articles: An analysis of 45 fieldsA review of altmetrics as an emerging discipline for research evaluationGrand challenges in altmetrics: heterogeneity, data quality and dependenciesA multidimensional analysis of Aslib proceedings – using everything but the impact factorThe thematic orientation of publications mentioned on social mediaTo what extent does the Leiden manifesto also apply to altmetrics? A discussion of the manifesto against the background of research into altmetricsUsefulness of altmetrics for measuring the broader impact of research
P2860
Q30490500-C08E7BFD-ADF8-4ABD-A3E3-A393299063EDQ34084040-BD82408A-5491-44A1-90D1-235BD12722FCQ36896956-D28D5A63-9184-40A7-B181-01EC8440E5FCQ56219998-7CB2100E-6EA1-4D95-ABC3-03C43DA1A2C1Q56220004-63741B27-8673-4780-9C96-D2C2EA0FF441Q56220018-B556A0A0-3DF3-4BF5-83A3-1AB874F0832BQ56220037-07A49379-F1D8-41EE-9A57-9EC9E996F364Q56220044-158C0CBF-9100-4D15-A9BB-0648674191BDQ56220047-136593BC-D5D7-4FAA-B4D6-8CB24CB17628Q56220068-F11A9C3F-C703-4F49-ABFE-D21E1BE450B0Q56220077-755777A0-8F31-40A9-8EB0-FB3E755AA10EQ57826974-A0509435-9C5C-4C96-A6EB-A6C6DC1BDA19Q57898013-F5E9B20E-E861-4DA0-83BC-F56DAA6C9C2EQ57898088-155069F4-BABA-45B4-9FC0-3C6F30582909Q58602252-881FA973-5019-4F66-A744-8F31D31754CEQ58781501-696F3AFC-F352-4DA1-A78C-4EA380394A04Q58899925-13E24649-3467-43BD-B631-E0DCAEAAD704
P2860
Tweets vs. Mendeley readers: How do these two social media metrics differ?
description
wetenschappelijk artikel
@nl
наукова стаття, опублікована в січні 2014
@uk
name
Tweets vs. Mendeley readers: How do these two social media metrics differ?
@en
Tweets vs. Mendeley readers: How do these two social media metrics differ?
@nl
type
label
Tweets vs. Mendeley readers: How do these two social media metrics differ?
@en
Tweets vs. Mendeley readers: How do these two social media metrics differ?
@nl
prefLabel
Tweets vs. Mendeley readers: How do these two social media metrics differ?
@en
Tweets vs. Mendeley readers: How do these two social media metrics differ?
@nl
P50
P921
P356
P1476
Tweets vs. Mendeley readers: How do these two social media metrics differ?
@en
P2093
Didier Amyot
Isabella Peters
P356
10.1515/ITIT-2014-1048
P407
P577
2014-01-28T00:00:00Z