Climate model response from the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP)
about
Potential climate engineering effectiveness and side effects during a high carbon dioxide-emission scenarioPotential negative consequences of geoengineering on crop production: A study of Indian groundnutA risk-based framework for assessing the effectiveness of stratospheric aerosol geoengineeringCirrus cloud seeding: a climate engineering mechanism with reduced side effects?The hydrological impact of geoengineering in the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP)Reflecting on 50 years of geoengineering researchAn overview of the Earth system science of solar geoengineeringA comparison of temperature and precipitation responses to different Earth radiation management geoengineering schemesAn energetic perspective on hydrological cycle changes in the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison ProjectAn overview of the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP)Sea spray geoengineering experiments in the geoengineering model intercomparison project (GeoMIP): Experimental design and preliminary resultsSimultaneous stabilization of global temperature and precipitation through cocktail geoengineeringKey impacts of climate engineering on biodiversity and ecosystems, with priorities for future researchClimate engineering reconsideredCan regional climate engineering save the summer Arctic sea ice?The asymmetry of the climate system's response to solar forcing changes and its implications for geoengineering scenariosTowards a comprehensive climate impacts assessment of solar geoengineeringThe cost of stratospheric climate engineering revisitedStratospheric dynamics and midlatitude jets under geoengineering with space mirrors and sulfate and titania aerosolsStratospheric ozone response to sulfate geoengineering: Results from the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP)The climatic effects of modifying cirrus clouds in a climate engineering frameworkShortwave radiative forcing, rapid adjustment, and feedback to the surface by sulfate geoengineering: analysis of the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project G4 scenarioThermodynamic and dynamic responses of the hydrological cycle to solar dimmingRadiative and climate effects of stratospheric sulfur geoengineering using seasonally varying injection areasKey factors governing uncertainty in the response to sunshade geoengineering from a comparison of the GeoMIP ensemble and a perturbed parameter ensembleOn solar geoengineering and climate uncertaintyIndicators and metrics for the assessment of climate engineeringAlbedo enhancement by stratospheric sulfur injections: More research neededA multimodel examination of climate extremes in an idealized geoengineering experimentArctic cryosphere response in the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project G3 and G4 scenariosArctic sea ice and atmospheric circulation under the GeoMIP G1 scenarioForcings and feedbacks in the GeoMIP ensemble for a reduction in solar irradiance and increase in CO2Modifications of the quasi-biennial oscillation by a geoengineering perturbation of the stratospheric aerosol layerSolar geoengineering could substantially reduce climate risks-A research hypothesis for the next decadeThe impact of geoengineering on vegetation in experiment G1 of the GeoMIPThe hydrological sensitivity to global warming and solar geoengineering derived from thermodynamic constraintsModeling in Earth system science up to and beyond IPCC AR5Can climate-effective land management reduce regional warming?
P2860
Q28657967-CC54D6AD-E562-452C-BA88-BFC78E596B9EQ31161418-8A043BDE-A6C0-412A-AB54-42F5BDD1B2C6Q35095584-EAEF905A-E763-4E04-9A95-0148F4C6C293Q42697597-DCE1D2C7-3C0D-4685-9899-488211D3DB65Q56523879-CAA16EAF-6750-4CA9-835A-3389325794E7Q56679512-47E76056-A9CC-44F4-9B72-8B288A504A23Q56679513-33709953-2C57-4F76-A7F2-E11F0D7C1690Q56837405-A2F76C5A-3E17-46B5-B1AE-A0221E0C8D49Q56837430-E7BA11F2-1700-4E35-B7EF-90BE603155E8Q56837432-EA90E74D-B970-4228-84AC-E743A9252754Q56837441-022D1F92-6FD8-4A80-9575-08C6D090F7ACQ56867640-D7F0D47B-996F-4CAC-B1EE-9004F6C50699Q57012867-43CA850E-E7F6-4860-8636-76440F4A6C5BQ57030861-4B09CEC2-CDEC-47D5-96A2-BBA9062EB613Q57089805-095027A6-510B-4994-AC5D-466F6CC1763EQ57175945-31EA2EED-3186-461D-B320-6CCC90D2B2B2Q57197122-2C25D6FF-CF1A-4EDE-8687-76F734C9469AQ57256400-FBBF3110-DFE0-4689-A058-9CD32DF38E2DQ57256403-5BCF9C1D-F915-42C2-B958-1668930D5943Q57536800-BFD5B201-4C3F-4536-8A13-E52BE199C600Q57677762-6D809B40-7E62-46DF-BC04-5586E4E54A81Q57881628-BB0FDCD8-C150-457E-9040-B2D9E238E91FQ57882386-AB843EE6-4293-4CA8-BA7B-2BF1310AC5F9Q57882556-1A4CC39C-B503-4C36-AC86-003172EA6778Q58063400-92D8AF70-315A-4A2A-922B-2765F714571BQ58070060-0007F15D-DF33-4165-BBFA-B28733928CE7Q58240076-FA1FB9C6-F45E-4521-BA30-BD4093365277Q58262029-FBBCF693-1D51-41F8-89C4-B0136AB71BB0Q58262112-5F99684D-F0BB-46F5-96DE-593525581BE9Q58262116-0BF82FC3-D111-48F7-A458-C51375C948ACQ58262121-8DC6EABC-15F4-4F64-B307-E1F59C534A8CQ58262129-43A441DF-C407-428B-9BEB-4F4D3ECA75E3Q58305835-F5668DD5-1C79-48C5-9B10-5EE899DCAC02Q58306127-616F3425-5A11-419E-A6ED-3121383084DCQ58306134-DB6DE847-59AD-415B-81EB-2CD44F54063CQ58384358-503DFC42-9A0D-4DAF-BDE2-1A5FC8B3F9D2Q58384534-CE1BF5C7-E66C-4518-82FB-8194DBC155D7Q58413293-7139E4BC-1256-41BA-800E-A9C8C0E064B9
P2860
Climate model response from the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP)
description
article
@en
wetenschappelijk artikel
@nl
наукова стаття, опублікована в серпні 2013
@uk
name
Climate model response from the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP)
@en
Climate model response from the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project
@nl
type
label
Climate model response from the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP)
@en
Climate model response from the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project
@nl
prefLabel
Climate model response from the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP)
@en
Climate model response from the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project
@nl
P2093
P2860
P50
P356
P1476
Climate model response from the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP)
@en
P2093
Andy Jones
Balwinder Singh
Daniel J. Lunt
Diana Bou Karam
Duoying Ji
Hauke Schmidt
James M. Haywood
Jason N. S. Cole
Jin-Ho Yoon
John C. Moore
P2860
P304
P356
10.1002/JGRD.50646
P577
2013-08-09T00:00:00Z