about
Emerging trends in peer review-a surveyA reliability-generalization study of journal peer reviews: a multilevel meta-analysis of inter-rater reliability and its determinantsWhat is open peer review? A systematic reviewA multi-disciplinary perspective on emergent and future innovations in peer reviewEffect of anatomic site and irradiation on the rates of revision and infection of allograft-prosthesis composites after resection of a primary bone tumor: a meta-analysis.Quality and peer review of research: an adjudicating role for editors.Manuscript peer review: a guide for advanced practice nurses.How important tasks are performed: peer reviewRanking games.Advancing kinesiology through improved peer review.Research funding. Big names or big ideas: do peer-review panels select the best science proposals?Evaluating the Pros and Cons of Different Peer Review Policies via Simulation.From Manuscript Evaluation to Article Valuation: The Changing Technologies of Journal Peer ReviewEditorial JudgmentsA Study of the Intersubjective Reviewer Agreement and Manuscript Improvement During the Evaluation Process of Journal SubmissionsA web application for aggregating conflicting reviewers’ preferences
P2860
Q24273351-76B64171-B736-437F-B84F-95BBF094D1E2Q24288722-A9175920-EB5D-4795-8BFB-3D8BC7321785Q29649956-D37078C3-DC54-4A20-A7B2-CB5E6368D1DDQ33269085-D3D66675-9764-4945-B6D2-EEA4FC7016D7Q36102051-06957D95-5464-4B58-81D5-2BDA7243CF0FQ37749687-122589C0-01AD-4BE8-8D6E-70AC4F9975C3Q37826225-B26342BB-FEC1-40FB-9809-958F8553AFCEQ38099571-FB2FE815-5925-46CE-A313-CA6669AA46CEQ38237046-9B89B691-0E2F-476A-BC2B-5FB8CC23A084Q38237401-BB342E30-140D-449D-9729-3025EC94C14EQ38440296-C5510BE2-EF23-4D77-BAF1-21E09BA15851Q38546308-834B34E6-930A-4E72-A31E-E73E02896694Q56854653-E35B1EEF-FC33-4144-A0BA-8B9654B5F196Q56854657-1934A1AC-64A9-4CE1-A54B-7F8366048C31Q58595129-8E1D22C1-8328-4792-BFCC-F839426F029AQ58996619-5C743528-3135-424A-BAAA-6BB0165864FC
P2860
description
article
@en
im März 1998 veröffentlichter wissenschaftlicher Artikel
@de
wetenschappelijk artikel
@nl
наукова стаття, опублікована в березні 1998
@uk
name
Peer Review for Journals as it Stands Today—Part 1
@en
Peer Review for Journals as it Stands Today—Part 1
@nl
type
label
Peer Review for Journals as it Stands Today—Part 1
@en
Peer Review for Journals as it Stands Today—Part 1
@nl
prefLabel
Peer Review for Journals as it Stands Today—Part 1
@en
Peer Review for Journals as it Stands Today—Part 1
@nl
P2860
P1476
Peer Review for Journals as it Stands Today—Part 1
@en
P2093
JUAN MIGUEL CAMPANARIO
P2860
P304
P356
10.1177/1075547098019003002
P577
1998-03-01T00:00:00Z