A core outcome set for aphasia treatment research: Obstacles, risks, and benefits

about

A good outcome for aphasia Discourse measurement in aphasia: consensus and caveats Let’s talk real talk: an argument to include conversation in a D-COS for aphasia research with an acknowledgment of the challenges ahead

P2860

Q58142457-0FD9BBAB-A3F0-4CA3-BA3A-33D15C3708E4 Q58142533-BEE44194-E59B-4514-9E5B-3D93AD95ABCD Q58251670-2483B86B-B050-4029-AF6D-F41EBF331EC2

P2860

A core outcome set for aphasia treatment research: Obstacles, risks, and benefits

Item

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q58156292

description

article

@en

wetenschappelijk artikel

@nl

наукова стаття, опублікована в липні 2014

@uk

name

A core outcome set for aphasia treatment research: Obstacles, risks, and benefits

@en

A core outcome set for aphasia treatment research: Obstacles, risks, and benefits

@nl

type

Item

label

A core outcome set for aphasia treatment research: Obstacles, risks, and benefits

@en

A core outcome set for aphasia treatment research: Obstacles, risks, and benefits

@nl

prefLabel

A core outcome set for aphasia treatment research: Obstacles, risks, and benefits

@en

A core outcome set for aphasia treatment research: Obstacles, risks, and benefits

@nl

P1476

A core outcome set for aphasia treatment research: Obstacles, risks, and benefits

@en

P2093

Gerasimos Fergadiotis

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Patrick J. Doyle

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

William D. Hula

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P2860

Measurement invariance of the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) among Chinese and Dutch elderly

A critical review of the Delphi technique as a research methodology for nursing.

Explanatory and pragmatic attitudes in therapeutical trials.

Do self-report instruments allow meaningful comparisons across diverse population groups? Testing measurement invariance using the confirmatory factor analysis framework.

Making trials matter: pragmatic and explanatory trials and the problem of applicability.

The outcomes agenda: contribution of the UK clearing house on health outcomes.

Setting a research agenda to inform intensive comprehensive aphasia programs.

When does measurement invariance matter?

Cross-national comparability of the WHOQOL-BREF: a measurement invariance approach.

A phased developmental approach to neurorehabilitation research: the science of knowledge building.

P304

1396-1399

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P31

scholarly article

P356

10.1080/02687038.2014.930264

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P433

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P478

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P577

2014-07-15T00:00:00Z

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime

A core outcome set for aphasia treatment research: Obstacles, risks, and benefits

about

P2860

P2860

A core outcome set for aphasia treatment research: Obstacles, risks, and benefits

description

name

type

label

prefLabel

P1433

P1476

P2093

P2860

P304

P31

P356

P433

P478

P577

P356

P1433

P1476

P2093

P2860

P304

P31

P356

P433

P478

P577