Comparison of impairment and disability measures for assessing severity of, and improvement in, aphasia
about
Informativeness ratings of messages created on an AAC processing prosthesis.Microlinguistic processes that contribute to the ability to relay main events: influence of age.Reviewing the quality of discourse information measures in aphasia.Narrative and procedural discourse production by severely aphasic patients.TRAINING VERB PRODUCTION IN COMMUNICATIVE CONTEXT: EVIDENCE FROM A PERSON WITH CHRONIC NON-FLUENT APHASIA.The Main Concept Analysis: Validation and sensitivity in differentiating discourse produced by unimpaired English speakers from individuals with aphasia and dementia of Alzheimer type.Discourse information content in non-aphasic adults with brain injury: a pilot study.Oral and written picture description in individuals with aphasia.Towards a quantitative measure of verbal effectiveness and efficiency in the Amsterdam-Nijmegen Everyday Language Test (ANELT)Relationships among language impairment, functional communication, and pragmatic performance in aphasiaAphasia severity, semantics, and depression predict functional communication in acquired aphasiaAAC for hypothesis testing and treatment of aphasic language production: Lessons from a “processing prosthesis”Item response theory analysis of the Western Aphasia BatteryPatterns of language improvement in adults with non‐chronic non‐fluent aphasia after specific therapiesSocial validation as a measure of improvement after aphasia treatment: Its usefulness and influencing factorsMain concepts for three different discourse tasks in a large non-clinical sample
P2860
Q36782555-C529EC8F-0B5A-4E9A-8A91-E22E0F68C1D9Q37081276-B938645C-CE22-4409-9CCE-D63606F65A5FQ38754879-6DFDA6FF-0FBC-4A41-82A0-79DEDD16A86EQ40633582-6E88BABE-99F0-418A-8299-02818D1957B0Q41320544-0228B2D9-B9AA-4292-8744-703F671511C0Q48136249-60A35B95-8E04-421F-B183-04685765C1D2Q48966652-8B515235-6E1B-4383-A4A0-ECADFDA4BF53Q50099535-B8681019-0D7F-41B2-89F0-0245DF5CF31FQ58131118-81445D79-83F8-411E-AF75-EEE07CC5A027Q58141378-5E24C219-549A-4E62-9552-7AFFD7CACD0CQ58142591-B0AC9471-E9D3-410B-B82D-1C0DF077DF2EQ58249291-7EF8847A-892F-49A0-8EDD-AEA7C787444FQ58260184-9A5083F6-49D0-4940-99E2-0ED8771669CBQ58269379-DE232485-C323-4DCC-A0FA-0B6AE7278327Q58284550-E0DE4E57-9974-46D9-B49D-D09B6DB38C73Q58303941-41B587F9-366C-49B4-87FD-AA6773876411
P2860
Comparison of impairment and disability measures for assessing severity of, and improvement in, aphasia
description
wetenschappelijk artikel
@nl
наукова стаття, опублікована в лютому 1999
@uk
name
Comparison of impairment and d ...... f, and improvement in, aphasia
@en
Comparison of impairment and d ...... f, and improvement in, aphasia
@nl
type
label
Comparison of impairment and d ...... f, and improvement in, aphasia
@en
Comparison of impairment and d ...... f, and improvement in, aphasia
@nl
prefLabel
Comparison of impairment and d ...... f, and improvement in, aphasia
@en
Comparison of impairment and d ...... f, and improvement in, aphasia
@nl
P2860
P356
P1433
P1476
Comparison of impairment and d ...... f, and improvement in, aphasia
@en
P2093
KATHERINE B. ROSS
P2860
P304
P356
10.1080/026870399402235
P577
1999-02-01T00:00:00Z