Measuring Knowledge Translation Uptake Using Citation Metrics: A Case Study of a Pan-Canadian Network of Pharmacoepidemiology Researchers

about

Measuring Knowledge Translation Uptake Using Citation Metrics: A Case Study of a Pan-Canadian Network of Pharmacoepidemiology Researchers

Item

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q58504684

description

article

@en

wetenschappelijk artikel

@nl

наукова стаття, опублікована в червні 2016

@uk

name

Measuring Knowledge Translatio ...... armacoepidemiology Researchers

@en

Measuring Knowledge Translatio ...... armacoepidemiology Researchers

@nl

type

Item

label

Measuring Knowledge Translatio ...... armacoepidemiology Researchers

@en

Measuring Knowledge Translatio ...... armacoepidemiology Researchers

@nl

prefLabel

Measuring Knowledge Translatio ...... armacoepidemiology Researchers

@en

Measuring Knowledge Translatio ...... armacoepidemiology Researchers

@nl

P1476

Measuring Knowledge Translatio ...... armacoepidemiology Researchers

@en

P2093

Ingrid S. Sketris

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Melissa Helwig

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Melissa Rothfus

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Robyn Traynor

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Samuel A. Stewart

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P2860

Three options for citation tracking: Google Scholar, Scopus and Web of Science

An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output.

Q27009314

What do citation counts measure? A review of studies on citing behavior

Google Scholar as replacement for systematic literature searches: good relative recall and precision are not enough.

Atypical antipsychotics and hyperglycemic emergencies: multicentre, retrospective cohort study of administrative data.

Higher potency statins and the risk of new diabetes: multicentre, observational study of administrative databases.

Use of high potency statins and rates of admission for acute kidney injury: multicenter, retrospective observational analysis of administrative databases.

Which h-index? — A comparison of WoS, Scopus and Google Scholar

Critical Assessment of Endoscopic Techniques for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease.

P304

228-240

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P31

scholarly article

P356

10.1080/0194262X.2016.1192008

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P433

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P478

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P577

2016-06-27T00:00:00Z

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime

P921

citation analysis