Measuring the Quality of Academic Journals: The Case of Economics
about
The "Mendel syndrome" in science: durability of scientific literature and its effects on bibliometric analysis of individual scientists.The imprecise science of evaluating scholarly performance: utilizing broad quality categories for an assessment of business and management journals.Core Journals in EconomicsWhat drives the relevance and reputation of economics journals? An update from a survey among economistsReputation and Relevance of Economics Journals“Empirical characteristics” and “geocentricity” in “top” journals of logistics managementJournal interaction
P2860
Q35209614-5D28302D-ECA5-4C67-AEB7-F4406DD3F683Q40311701-2EF646C4-63F5-4699-BF59-BD5943DDBE1CQ56552748-BD825C04-5EB0-439A-AE1B-C9DC8BD57ABCQ57389920-4871B608-366B-4DB4-992F-4CDA59FC642FQ57390083-A899DD84-3937-45AB-87A6-C6FA2EA3DF97Q57604433-94FDAA39-7914-40AA-9571-43BE3A1A0C7DQ58628591-3391CFAB-44E7-417B-B652-A53B4ADD6B80
P2860
Measuring the Quality of Academic Journals: The Case of Economics
description
im März 1996 veröffentlichter wissenschaftlicher Artikel
@de
wetenschappelijk artikel
@nl
наукова стаття, опублікована в березні 1996
@uk
name
Measuring the Quality of Academic Journals: The Case of Economics
@en
Measuring the Quality of Academic Journals: The Case of Economics
@nl
type
label
Measuring the Quality of Academic Journals: The Case of Economics
@en
Measuring the Quality of Academic Journals: The Case of Economics
@nl
prefLabel
Measuring the Quality of Academic Journals: The Case of Economics
@en
Measuring the Quality of Academic Journals: The Case of Economics
@nl
P2860
P1476
Measuring the Quality of Academic Journals: The Case of Economics
@en
P2093
P2860
P304
P356
10.1080/01603477.1996.11490078
P577
1996-03-01T00:00:00Z