The correlation between citation counts and the 1992 research assessment exercise ratings for British research in genetics, anatomy and archaeology
about
What do citation counts measure? A review of studies on citing behaviorBibliometric methods: pitfalls and possibilities.A simple index for the high-citation tail of citation distribution to quantify research performance in countries and institutionsPeer-selected "best papers"-are they really that "good"?Tracing thought through time and space: a selective review of bibliometrics in social work.Shallow science or meta-cognitive insights: a few thoughts on reflection via bibliometrics.Two h-index benchmarks for evaluating the publication performance of medical informatics researchers.Articles with authors affiliated to Brazilian institutions published from 1994 to 2003 with 100 or more citations: II - identification of thematic nuclei of excellence in Brazilian science.A comparison of methods for collecting web citation data for academic organizationsAssessing the citation impact of books: The role of Google Books, Google Scholar, and ScopusCitation Performance of Malaysian Scholarly Journals in the Web of Science, 2006–2010Semiotics and evaluative bibliometricsA comparison of sources of links for academic Web impact factor calculationsTheh‐index: a broad review of a new bibliometric indicatorHow socially connected are citers to those that they cite?The J‐shaped distribution of citednessCitation counts and the Research Assessment Exercise VArts and humanities research evaluation: no metrics please, just dataInfluence and reputation in the social sciences – how much do researchers agree?
P2860
Q29397020-E395A0FB-E919-4787-AF65-3757061E3301Q33225527-9D303CA4-2444-44AD-B946-5E5750B1A76BQ33925280-AF6725C5-FFEE-4D86-8EF4-5E6C4E45A704Q35196665-D78B078B-20AC-4084-8424-15D0072AA218Q36291285-7C8F9BC2-574C-4FE2-81FE-54D5172C6434Q36291311-E61CC108-8C12-41DE-881A-681EB1D37F2EQ36453680-0F23E667-090C-4EDB-A741-8CB5E9CAF437Q53245636-53CA4AA3-301B-4CC7-B36E-C2DF7F834B76Q56220134-0D5A8011-55C0-4E3C-98DA-873528FD3B5EQ56220144-5CFFD799-26E6-4415-807B-DAB5B6D75AC3Q58566370-8C008488-E9ED-4A85-8E5D-8C3D9370800BQ58628639-209BEA9F-0A23-42BC-98A4-EF0D4D924568Q58629350-8A000A56-FE3E-405D-9417-F234CCAE397DQ58629561-13C2FA13-25B4-4875-A715-C933DF1DCE59Q58629654-7CEFD7CF-B9EA-449C-9BF8-61175DD5DE45Q58629673-BF5CE911-DD8B-4265-90AA-A192AF8BF6A8Q58631553-F33046FD-9090-4A1D-BB01-5B4C3E8E16C4Q58631875-2FF84A8D-8928-4B92-9816-085EBE6056D3Q58631913-3094E9D9-1901-4594-8C5B-3843D907CC42
P2860
The correlation between citation counts and the 1992 research assessment exercise ratings for British research in genetics, anatomy and archaeology
description
article
@en
im Dezember 1997 veröffentlichter wissenschaftlicher Artikel
@de
wetenschappelijk artikel
@nl
наукова стаття, опублікована в грудні 1997
@uk
name
The correlation between citati ...... etics, anatomy and archaeology
@en
The correlation between citati ...... etics, anatomy and archaeology
@nl
type
label
The correlation between citati ...... etics, anatomy and archaeology
@en
The correlation between citati ...... etics, anatomy and archaeology
@nl
prefLabel
The correlation between citati ...... etics, anatomy and archaeology
@en
The correlation between citati ...... etics, anatomy and archaeology
@nl
P2860
P356
P1476
The correlation between citati ...... etics, anatomy and archaeology
@en
P2093
Charles Oppenheim
P2860
P304
P356
10.1108/EUM0000000007207
P577
1997-12-01T00:00:00Z