Comparing Carbon and Water Footprints for Beef Cattle Production in Southern Australia - Wikidata - wikimedia - TriplyDB

Comparing Carbon and Water Footprints for Beef Cattle Production in Southern Australia

Comparing Carbon and Water Footprints for Beef Cattle Production in Southern Australia

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q58815692

about

Is the Grass Always Greener? Comparing the Environmental Impact of Conventional, Natural and Grass-Fed Beef Production Systems Greenhouse gas emissions and the Australian diet--comparing dietary recommendations with average intakes BOARD-INVITED REVIEW: Quantifying water use in ruminant production.An environmental, economic, and social assessment of improving cattle finishing weight or average daily gain within U.S. beef production.A simulation-based approach for evaluating and comparing the environmental footprints of beef production systems.The Water Footprint of the Wine Industry: Implementation of an Assessment Methodology and Application to a Case Study Assessment of the Carbon and Non-Carbon Footprint Interactions of Livestock Production in Eastern and Western Canada Consequential Life Cycle Assessment of Pasture-based Milk Production: A Case Study in the Waikato Region, New Zealand Addressing crop interactions within cropping systems in LCA

P2860

Q28647408-BCFB611E-36FF-4034-8AF5-79E4344B67E3 Q37564696-4208ADF7-6CC8-4EB7-B98C-C66604D704B0 Q39447393-ADFB0530-B4C5-4BAF-BC0C-D6428BF44DC2 Q44804479-52F20815-9764-4192-BED3-DCA34E7F85ED Q51227954-1EB0639A-A408-4B3F-B64D-0F4E95A1DB0A Q57542242-50E9B410-365B-4AF4-A25A-02B8FDA240C5 Q58159167-92D0E999-1F1C-48A0-90BD-7208F56D7568 Q58293859-F8BF4616-AE72-415C-86C8-D63EF1271DC6 Q58812234-C34AF707-711B-46F4-9D32-EF9610057A14

P2860

Comparing Carbon and Water Footprints for Beef Cattle Production in Southern Australia

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q58815692

description

article

@en

wetenschappelijk artikel

@nl

наукова стаття, опублікована в грудні 2011

@uk

name

Comparing Carbon and Water Footprints for Beef Cattle Production in Southern Australia

@en

Comparing Carbon and Water Footprints for Beef Cattle Production in Southern Australia

@nl

type

label

Comparing Carbon and Water Footprints for Beef Cattle Production in Southern Australia

@en

Comparing Carbon and Water Footprints for Beef Cattle Production in Southern Australia

@nl

prefLabel

Comparing Carbon and Water Footprints for Beef Cattle Production in Southern Australia

@en

Comparing Carbon and Water Footprints for Beef Cattle Production in Southern Australia

@nl

P1433

Q58815692-76B97668-D704-4993-8E0F-2562D7AF6D2A

P1476

Q58815692-FFE75FB3-215E-419E-8D7F-53876C0FE600

P2093

Q58815692-232988F0-EB5E-4FC1-902F-1FBC21A06A88

Q58815692-CBBCD648-B8E6-4F5A-B2A4-C59CF5945342

Q58815692-DD42862A-95DC-4053-AF4F-9D8CA4074B21

P2860

Q58815692-0CE976F7-7E50-4438-B043-14A08D36B5F0

Q58815692-119E0D21-9C16-488A-8753-64A8563EF0B7

Q58815692-1D8131E3-327E-489A-8360-A3B7E1B5D8EF

Q58815692-20900041-631F-488F-8A02-763792F568BF

Q58815692-3F8E7C7B-58C9-4390-96B9-FEFC6EADB77C

Q58815692-48B3EE64-5B60-44EA-9A3D-7F385630C898

Q58815692-4AD27EAF-8724-4FB8-9559-7D5339CB4F9B

Q58815692-4F468170-7C62-4FD9-996B-997651CA4B35

Q58815692-5C271950-6AB4-44B4-9BD3-2852D9AC69B5

Q58815692-69FB0185-0155-474E-B25A-907C10924CEE

P304

Q58815692-0F280AB9-C67A-45B8-9EE1-D7593E3DD350

P31

Q58815692-00B063BF-FD7B-4A36-875D-1984000D3D58

P356

Q58815692-12F2E1DD-639C-4AAB-8D0F-D504EC746CCF

P407

Q58815692-6040315C-542C-4397-9CC9-3B2E208D4F28

P433

Q58815692-BCCC9891-2908-4A6C-B159-547AFFD77C7D

P478

Q58815692-AB1CD283-5455-4015-B921-2A25E30387F3

P577

Q58815692-019A2C66-AD48-4CC9-AB13-9C4B89A624A7

P356

P1433

P1476

Comparing Carbon and Water Footprints for Beef Cattle Production in Southern Australia

@en

P2093

Bradley G. Ridoutt

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Gregory S. Harper

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Peerasak Sanguansri

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P2860

A safe operating space for humanity

Diet and the environment: does what you eat matter?

Red meat production in australia: life cycle assessment and comparison with overseas studies.

Including carbon emissions from deforestation in the carbon footprint of Brazilian beef.

China's move to higher-meat diet hits water security.

Water footprint of U.S. transportation fuels.

Characterization factors for global warming in life cycle assessment based on damages to humans and ecosystems.

Assessing the environmental impacts of freshwater consumption in LCA.

Options for the abatement of methane and nitrous oxide from ruminant production: A review

Methane mitigation in ruminants: from microbe to the farm scale

P304

2443-2455

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P31

scholarly article

P356

10.3390/SU3122443

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P407

P433

12

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P478

3

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P577

2011-12-13T00:00:00Z

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime