A new approach to the metric of journals’ scientific prestige: The SJR indicator
about
Amplifying the impact of open access: Wikipedia and the diffusion of scienceNew Issues for New Methods: Ethical and Editorial Challenges for an Experimental Philosophy.A recursive field-normalized bibliometric performance indicator: an application to the field of library and information scienceA bibliometric study of scientific literature in Scopus on botanicals for treatment of androgenetic alopecia.The Interplay between Scientific Overlap and Cooperation and the Resulting Gain in Co-Authorship Interactions.How to Rank Journals.Journal Impact Factor: Do the Numerator and Denominator Need Correction?Diversity, value and limitations of the journal impact factor and alternative metrics.A bibliometric study of scientific literature on the dietary therapies for epilepsy in Scopus.Measuring academic influence: Not all citations are equalKnowledge processes in virtual teams: consolidating the evidenceComputing a journal meta-ranking using paired comparisons and adaptive lasso estimatorsA review of literature on evaluating the scientific, social and political impact of social sciences and humanities researchMotivation Terminology in Reading Research: A Conceptual ReviewRelative measure index: a metric to measure the quality of journalsA multidimensional analysis of Aslib proceedings – using everything but the impact factorThe Complexity of Measuring the Impact of BooksInformetrics, bibliometrics, altmetrics: What is it all about?Expatriate management and national culture: a bibliometric study of prolific, productive, and most cited authors and institutionsUnderstanding the relevance of national culture in international business research: a quantitative analysisStrategies for Expanding the International Influences of Academic Journals: An Example from Chinese Pharmaceutical JournalsHow to Combine Research Guarantor and Collaboration Patterns to Measure Scientific Performance of Countries in Scientific Fields: Nanoscience and Nanotechnology as a Case StudyToward New Indicators of a Journal’s Manuscript Peer Review ProcessSomes patterns of Cuban scientific publication in Scopus: the current situation and challengesJournal maps, interactive overlays, and the measurement of interdisciplinarity on the basis of Scopus data (1996-2012)Citation-based metrics are appropriate tools in journal assessment provided that they are accurate and used in an informed wayLatin American scientific output in Public Health: combined analysis using bibliometric, socioeconomic and health indicatorsHow to interpret the position of private sector institutions in bibliometric rankings of research institutionsDo universities or research institutions with a specific subject profile have an advantage or a disadvantage in institutional rankings?Open access and Scopus: A new approach to scientific visibility from the standpoint of accessAn indicator of the impact of journals based on the percentage of their highly cited publications
P2860
Q27467795-A5E190FB-6CB8-4BA7-8B2B-45DC056E0489Q30395750-B3F779BC-1884-4116-B314-F2CE6A5967C6Q34034626-646582A2-AE10-47D3-B3B8-986CD96994CAQ34503143-ABBFD548-E1C8-4A88-BBD0-16F2167DCA84Q35776334-F420F2E8-CBA2-4ED6-B208-A4571D8BFB77Q35940671-63D1AFC7-F21B-4ADF-91B8-C0288987D6F0Q35957352-3E3E23C1-7099-47EF-BFE2-2D2C5F850261Q37970886-23F0DFE3-E21A-4E20-ADAF-2482480631EFQ38195860-D0005096-F1D9-47CE-9E4B-454F580F3F5FQ56689653-D0AE88F4-E484-42F6-97DC-3D0E87507908Q56899265-EAF2357C-EA35-4D46-B979-DEF4060DCBACQ57066548-8E472CE6-E3AA-47A6-A2C3-5CCC1150C996Q57374913-9EE58841-76F0-4D84-B5B0-8CFC3DA5571FQ57443286-1D748F35-BC58-4B6F-97DE-B88F9066CC40Q57747724-DADFAED0-0B9B-4C82-9111-76460E38A4F7Q57898088-72ACE9BB-36DD-4B30-9E0D-82EFBB863089Q57967790-52251A5A-8ADF-4780-8A82-4C7E431B9A9FQ57967858-1CC87C51-FFB3-4436-B92B-BE17F560437BQ58464344-02817CAB-6D60-4739-BD7C-9ECCB7809F5BQ58464369-DFF61F57-5C4B-405B-9F7B-6890C5F3F4BBQ58542470-AAE7441E-ED68-470F-ADC1-2017CECC2D70Q58643389-E689B8E5-ED4F-4C91-B3E9-F719320871BFQ58643394-6572A3BE-3E72-4F93-8EB1-4989B68CE466Q58878436-67E36867-3DF0-422B-94FA-31853775C628Q58931956-2F6BBFD9-D28E-4617-A3F1-04309000FD19Q58932002-C03C8849-605F-4AF2-A107-F876742BA4D0Q58996558-3B2F616E-A813-455A-AE65-8287B386274AQ58996677-6D8655A2-4AFC-435F-8CC4-CDE6B20A02AEQ58996830-E4DCEEC0-46CA-4D76-ADF7-369FE4B45D1FQ58997227-FB540355-C59F-49E1-8E3C-8FF96DFD37B4Q59191761-164A6E83-DF04-445C-8EBC-03A5EB63B900
P2860
A new approach to the metric of journals’ scientific prestige: The SJR indicator
description
im Juli 2010 veröffentlichter wissenschaftlicher Artikel
@de
wetenschappelijk artikel
@nl
наукова стаття, опублікована в липні 2010
@uk
name
A new approach to the metric of journals’ scientific prestige: The SJR indicator
@en
A new approach to the metric of journals’ scientific prestige: The SJR indicator
@nl
type
label
A new approach to the metric of journals’ scientific prestige: The SJR indicator
@en
A new approach to the metric of journals’ scientific prestige: The SJR indicator
@nl
prefLabel
A new approach to the metric of journals’ scientific prestige: The SJR indicator
@en
A new approach to the metric of journals’ scientific prestige: The SJR indicator
@nl
P2093
P1476
A new approach to the metric of journals’ scientific prestige: The SJR indicator
@en
P2093
Borja González-Pereira
Félix Moya-Anegón
Vicente P. Guerrero-Bote
P304
P356
10.1016/J.JOI.2010.03.002
P577
2010-07-01T00:00:00Z