about
Attention to irrelevant cues is related to positive symptoms in schizophreniaCompound Stimulus Presentation Does Not Deepen Extinction in Human Causal Learning.The influence of partner cues on the extinction of causal judgments in people.Cross-modal symbolic processing can elicit either an N2 or a protracted N2/N400 response.Relative salience versus relative validity: cue salience influences blocking in human associative learning.Delusions and prediction error: re-examining the behavioural evidence for disrupted error signalling in delusion formation.Effects of Outcome Predictability on Human Learning.Negative transfer in human associative learning.Neurophysiological evidence of efference copies to inner speech.Goal-Directed and Habit-Like Modulations of Stimulus Processing during Reinforcement Learning.Impaired mismatch negativity to frequency deviants in individuals at ultra-high risk for psychosis, and preliminary evidence for further impairment with transition to psychosis.The bridge between neuroscience and cognition must be tethered at both ends.Disrupted attentional learning in high schizotypy: Evidence of aberrant salience.Outcome Predictability Biases Cued Search.Outcome predictability biases learning.When goals conflict with values: counterproductive attentional and oculomotor capture by reward-related stimuli.Attentional mechanisms in learned predictiveness.A common error term regulates acquisition but not extinction of causal judgments in people.Feature-based versus category-based induction with uncertain categories.Speeded induction under uncertainty: the influence of multiple categories and feature conjunctions.Attentional changes in blocking are not a consequence of lateral inhibition.Changes in cue associability across training in human causal learning.Can young people reliably rate side effects of low-dose antipsychotic medication using a self-report survey?Where to look first for an explanation of induction with uncertain categoriesLearned biases in the processing of outcomes: A brief review of the outcome predictability effectSuperstition predicts perception of illusory controlThe outcome predictability bias is evident in overt attention
P50
Q36770076-1A79C0EF-E18E-4B6C-A445-C12984B86F22Q37632897-C158FABB-6CDD-4132-A377-5F56CB2A6149Q38223733-342E556D-9AF2-4257-A858-5801BC36E03EQ38394467-5386325F-5E5C-46A0-9914-B50C25D57703Q38443491-09C42059-DD0D-424A-AFCE-80C91FF4F1D3Q39215880-2EF884A6-8CC0-42B7-AB83-ED067476A8C4Q42292812-4A166AE8-5C74-4892-9E98-D141CD8F531BQ45334043-71D8F0E7-73CD-4BA3-8B20-1D2BA2D00A40Q47142024-75F13572-4779-42E3-B6E7-429434F8C93FQ47364483-4A1E8D7D-A9AB-4BED-B40D-69992BE897B2Q47574850-5415635B-7166-45EC-A1E9-FD3931D8FCC8Q48390873-1D0FFF20-A0F7-4159-BC2B-58C83DEC745CQ48635643-74DACE38-7D47-4AD4-B7D2-8B9E216FDBF0Q49496024-B1573FBE-8745-430F-BBC4-C596F79DBDBAQ50599570-73AB2979-279D-45BC-A1C6-1D26095D4732Q51771050-D4C1D7F7-38B0-4A20-B2D9-4C423D9ED94CQ51810287-5A06306F-B0CF-4A9B-A03D-002DB9F575B7Q51832190-54451716-3A58-46CB-9C05-20E4ADD415B1Q51848231-990EE5C2-3BCD-4029-ADEF-EDD969933A57Q51893076-48E835C6-48D1-4B30-B42B-C39CACFB10C0Q51943217-282ABA0B-C16D-4C46-852C-68F28A6E4FC4Q51947422-2DC1F636-DAB0-4D8C-91F5-DF108E861DAFQ59202717-A7A63112-D7A0-4E90-8D28-FCA8389860BAQ84969970-0EB7C66D-CF10-4FD7-9716-13CB4D46E897Q90862260-FC5E28C4-380F-463C-A7E5-1CB5F4457DACQ91135306-7B63A08A-4C93-4C92-BCE9-52FEE2C01F37Q91877728-190FB6D0-6F17-4125-928A-FED1A36D0A84
P50
description
onderzoeker
@nl
researcher ORCID ID = 0000-0002-9833-9998
@en
name
Oren Griffiths
@ast
Oren Griffiths
@en
Oren Griffiths
@es
Oren Griffiths
@nl
type
label
Oren Griffiths
@ast
Oren Griffiths
@en
Oren Griffiths
@es
Oren Griffiths
@nl
prefLabel
Oren Griffiths
@ast
Oren Griffiths
@en
Oren Griffiths
@es
Oren Griffiths
@nl
P106
P31
P496
0000-0002-9833-9998